Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:41:10.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age differences in achievement goals and motivational characteristics of work in an ageing workforce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2014

HEIKE HEIDEMEIER*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
URSULA M. STAUDINGER
Affiliation:
Columbia Aging Center, School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Heike Heidemeier, Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jaegerstrasse 17-19, 52066 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: heidemeier@psych.rwth-aachen.de

Abstract

This study reviews theory and results from developmental psychology to examine age differences in workplace achievement goals. We investigated whether goal level decreases with age and, by comparing the relative strength of different goals within individuals, we examined whether dominant achievement goals are related to age. In a large sample of employees (N=747), older workers' higher affective commitment and intrinsic motivation compensated for age-related decline in the importance of achievement goals. Whether learning-approach and learning-avoidance were dominant goals was not related to age but instead to skill level, affective commitment and intrinsically satisfying work. Dominant performance-approach goals were more common among males. Performance-avoidance was most likely to be a dominant goal among older males. Moreover, with age, performance-goal orientations had increasingly maladaptive consequences for self-efficacy and affect at work.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L. 1996. A theory of adult intellectual development: process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 2, 229–59.Google Scholar
Ackerman, P. L. 2000. Domain-specific knowledge as the ‘dark matter’ of adult intelligence: gf/gc, personality and interest correlates. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 55, 2, 6984.Google Scholar
Allen, J. A. and Meyer, J. P. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1, 118.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A. and McDaniel, M. A. 1990. Age and work performance in nonmanagerial jobs: the effects of experience and occupational type. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 2, 116.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. 1997. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundations of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 4, 366–38.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2, 248–87.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy. In Ramachaudran, V. S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Volume 4, Academic Press, New York, 7181.Google Scholar
Baranik, L. E., Stanley, L. J., Bynum, B. H. and Lance, C. E. 2010. Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: a meta-analysis. Human Performance, 23, 3, 265–82.Google Scholar
Bell, B. S. and Kozlowski, S. 2002. Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3, 497505.Google Scholar
Brandtstätter, J. and Renner, G. 1990. Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5, 1, 5867.Google Scholar
Brandtstätter, J., Rothermund, K. and Schmitz, U. 1998. Maintaining self-integrity and efficacy through adulthood and later life: The adaptive functions of assimilative persistence and accommodative flexibility. In Heckhausen, J. and Dweck, C. S. (eds), Motivation and Self-regulation Across the Life Span. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1, 365–8.Google Scholar
Brett, J. F. and VandeWalle, D. 1999. Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 6, 863–73.Google Scholar
Butler, R. and Neuman, O. 1995. Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 2, 261–71.Google Scholar
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M. 1996. Goal orientation in organizational research: a conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1, 2648.Google Scholar
Caldwell, S. D., Herold, D. M. and Fedor, D. B. 2004. Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person–environment fit: a cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 5, 868–82.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1992. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 3, 331–8.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1995. Evidence for a life span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 5, 151–6.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M. and Charles, S. T. 1999. Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 3, 165–81.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. 1987. Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth, and Action. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D. and Moller, A. 2006. The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 4, 666–79.Google Scholar
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P. and Newall, N. E. 2009. A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: from affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 4, 948–63.Google Scholar
Day, R. and Allen, T. 2004. The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protégé career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 1, 7291.Google Scholar
de Lange, A. H., Van Yperen, N. W., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. and Bal, P. M. 2010. Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 1, 118–25.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. S. 1986. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 10, 1040–8.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S., Hong, Y.-Y. and Chiu, C.-Y. 1993. Implicit theories: individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 5, 644–56.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. and Leggett, E. L. 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 2, 256–73.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. and Wortman, C. B. 1982. Learned helplessness, anxiety, and achievement motivation: neglected parallels in cognitive, affective, and coping responses. Series in Clinical & Community Psychology: Achievement, Stress, & Anxiety, 1982, 93125.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Karau, S. J. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 3, 573–98.Google Scholar
Eckes, T. 1994. Explorations in gender cognition: content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 1, 3760.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 3, 169–89.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. 2005. Competence and motivation: competence as the core of achievement motivation. In Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (eds), Handbook of Competence and Motivation. Volume xvi, Guilford Publications, New York, 312.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. and McGregor, H. A. 2001. A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 3, 501–19.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. and Murayama, K. 2008. On the measurement of achievement goals: critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 3, 613–28.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. S. and Dweck, C. S. 1988. Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1, 512.Google Scholar
Elzinga, C. H. and Liefbroer, A. C. 2007. De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: a cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population, 23, 3–4, 225–50.Google Scholar
Farr, J. L., Hofmann, D. A. and Ringenbach, K. L. 1993. Goal orientation and action control theory: implications for industrial and organizational psychology. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Wiley, New York, 193232.Google Scholar
Ford, J., Smith, E., Weissbein, D. A. and Gully, S. M. 1998. Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 2, 218–33.Google Scholar
Franz, C. E. 1994. Does thought content change as individuals age? A longitudinal study of midlife adults. In Heatherton, T. F. and Weinberger, J. L. (eds), Can personality Change? American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 227–49.Google Scholar
Freund, A. M. 2006. Age-differential motivational consequences of optimization versus compensation focus in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 2, 240–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freund, A. M. and Baltes, P. B. 1998. Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 4, 531–43.Google Scholar
Fung, H. H. and Carstensen, L. L. 1994. Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 19, 1, 6878.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, M. W. and Brown, K. G. 2005. Individual differences in self-efficacy development: the effects of goal orientation and affectivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1, 4359.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. and Arvey, R. 2004. Age bias in laboratory and field settings: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 3, 468–92.Google Scholar
Hall, N., Perry, R., Chipperfield, J., Clifton, R. and Haynes, T. 2006. Enhancing primary and secondary control in achievement settings through writing-based attributional retraining. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 4, 361–91.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J., Dixon, R. and Baltes, P. 1989. Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Developmental Psychology, 25, 1, 109–21.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J. and Schulz, R. 1995. A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 2, 284304.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C. and Schulz, R. 2010. A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 1, 3260.Google Scholar
Heidemeier, H. and Bittner, J. V. 2012. Competition and achievement goals in teams. Human Performance, 25, 2, 138–58.Google Scholar
Henretta, J. 1994. Social structure and age-based careers. In Riley, M. W., Kahn, R. L., Foner, A. and Mack, K. A. (eds), Age and Structural Lag: Society's Failure to Provide Meaningful Opportunities in Work, Family, and Leisure. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, 5779.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 12, 1280–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, E. T. and Silberman, I. 1998. Development of regulatory focus: promotion and prevention as ways of living. In Heckhausen, J. and Dweck, C. S. (eds), Motivation and Self-regulation Across the Life Span. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 78113.Google Scholar
International Labor Office 1990. International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88). International Labor Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. 1990. Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 221239.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. and Ackerman, P. L. 2000. Individual differences in work motivation: further explorations of a trait framework. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 3, 470–82.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. and Ackerman, P. L. 2004. Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 3, 440–58.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 1986. The world we forgot: a historical review of the life course. In Marshall, V. (ed.), Later Life: The Social Psychology of Aging. Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 271303.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. T. A. M., de Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. W., Kanfer, R. and Dikkers, J. S. E. 2011. Age and work-related motives: results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 2, 197225.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M. and Nason, E. R. 2001. Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1, 131.Google Scholar
Kubeck, J. E., Delp, N. D., Haslett, T. K. and McDaniel, M. A. 1996. Does job-related training performance decline with age? Psychology and Aging, 11, 1, 92107.Google Scholar
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J. and Dweck, C. S. 1998. Stereotype formation and endorsement: the role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 6, 1421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, P., Alison, L., Chasteen, A. and Wong, C. 2005. Age and regulatory focus determine preferences for health-related models. Psychology and Aging, 20, 3, 376–89.Google Scholar
Martocchio, J. 1994. Effects of conceptions of ability on academic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 6, 819–25.Google Scholar
Maurer, T. 2001. Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about self-efficacy for development. Journal of Management, 27, 2, 123–40.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. and Franz, C. E. 1992. Motivational and other sources of work accomplishments in mid-life. Journal of Personality, 60, 4, 679707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, G. M. and Cascio, W. F. 1989. Cumulative evidence of the relationship between employee age and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 1, 1117.Google Scholar
Midgley, C. A. K. and Middleton, M. 2001. Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 1, 7786.Google Scholar
Mone, M. 1994. Comparative validity of two measures of self-efficacy in predicting academic goals and performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 2, 516–29.Google Scholar
Morling, B. and Evered, S. 2006. Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 2, 269–96.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H. and Feldman, D. C. 2008. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 2, 392423.Google Scholar
Ng, T. W. H. and Feldman, D. C. 2010. The relationships of age with job attitudes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 3, 677–1.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2007. Education at a Glance 2007. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Pan, W., Sun, L.-Y. and Chow, I. 2010. The impact of supervisory mentoring on personal learning and career outcomes: the dual moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 2, 264273.Google Scholar
Payne, S., Youngcourt, S. and Beaubien, J. 2007. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1, 128–50.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. 2000. Multiple goals, multiple pathsways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 3, 544555.Google Scholar
Potosky, D. and Ramakrishna, H. 2002. The moderating role of updating climate perceptions in the relationship between goal orientation, self-efficacy, and job performance. Human Performance, 15, 3, 275–97.Google Scholar
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. and Snyder, S. 1982. Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1, 537.Google Scholar
Salmela-Aro, K., Nurmi, J.-E., Aro, A., Poppius, E. and Riste, J. 1992. Age differences in adults' personal projects. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 415417.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. and Maurer, T. 1996. Aging, job performance and career development. In Birren, J. and Schaie, K. (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, Fourth edition, Academic Press, San Diego, 353–64.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. 1996. Intellectual Development in Adulthood: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Swan, S. and Wyer, R. S. 1997. Gender stereotypes and social identity: how being in the minority affects judgment of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 12, 1265–76.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. and Urwin, P. 2001. Age and participation in vocational education and training. Work, Employment and Society, 15, 4, 763–79.Google Scholar
Utman, C. H. 1997. Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 2, 170–82.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, B. 2006. Age differences in career activities among higher-level employees in the Netherlands: a comparison between profit sector and non-profit sector staff. International Journal of Training and Development, 10, 2, 98120.Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. 1998. Informational support, equity and burnout: the moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 1, 2933.Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W. 2006. A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2×2 framework: identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 11, 1432–45.Google Scholar
VandeWalle, D. 1997. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 6, 9951015.Google Scholar
VandeWalle, D., Ganesan, S., Challagalla, G. N. and Brown, S. P. 2000. An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: disposition, context, and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 6, 9961003.Google Scholar
Waldman, D. A. and Avolio, B. J. 1986. A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 1, 33–8.Google Scholar
Warr, P. and Birdi, K. 1998. Employee age and voluntary development activity. International Journal of Training and Development, 2, 3, 190204.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 6, 1063–70.Google Scholar
Widmer, E. D. and Ritschard, G. 2009. The de-standardization of the life course: are men and women equal? Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 1–2, 2839.Google Scholar
Wrosch, C., Bauer, I. and Scheier, M. 2005. Regret and quality of life across the adult life span: the influence of disengagement and available future goals. Psychology and Aging, 20, 4, 657–70.Google Scholar