Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    PULKKI, JUTTA and TYNKKYNEN, LIINA-KAISA 2016. ‘All elderly people have important service needs’: a study of discourses on older people in parliamentary discussions in Finland. Ageing and Society, Vol. 36, Issue. 01, p. 64.


    Carney, Gemma M. and Gray, Mia 2015. Unmasking the ‘elderly mystique’: Why it is time to make the personal political in ageing research. Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 35, p. 123.


    Trentham, Barry Sokoloff, Sandra Tsang, Amie and Neysmith, Sheila 2015. Social media and senior citizen advocacy: an inclusive tool to resist ageism?. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, p. 558.


    Abid, Yosr and O'Donoghue, Cathal 2014. Irish Citizens’ Attitudes to Pension Reform and Redistribution. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 13, Issue. 02, p. 203.


    Hall, Matthew 2014. Invisible Crimes and Social Harms.


    ×

Citizenship and structured dependency: the implications of policy design for senior political power

  • GEMMA M. CARNEY (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09990110
  • Published online: 14 August 2009
Abstract
ABSTRACT

This paper argues that the structured dependency thesis must be extended to incorporate political power. It outlines a political framework of analysis with which to identify who gains and who loses from social policy. I argue that public policy for older people is a product not only of social structures but also of political decision-making. The Schneider and Ingram (1993) ‘target populations’ model is used to investigate how the social construction of groups as dependent equates with lower levels of influence on policy making. In United Kingdom and European research, older people are identified as politically quiescent, but conversely in the United States seniors are viewed as one of the most influential and cohesive interest groups in the political culture. Why are American seniors perceived as politically powerful, while older people in Europe are viewed as dependent and politically weak? This paper applies the ‘target populations’ model to senior policy in the Republic of Ireland to investigate how theoretical work in the United States may be used to identify the significance of senior power in policy development. I conclude that research must recognise the connections between power, politics and social constructions to investigate how state policies can influence the likelihood that seniors will resist structured dependency using political means.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Gemma Carney, Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, J.E. Cairnes Building, National University of Ireland Galway, County Galway, Republic of Ireland. E-mail: gemma.carney@nuigalway.ie
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Duncan 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old-age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.

H. Ingram and A. Schneider 1995. Social construction (continued): response. American Political Science Review, 89, 2, 441–6.

R. Lieberman 1995. Social construction (continued). American Political Science Review, 89, 2, 437–41.

R. Kitchin and R. Wilton 2003. Disability activism and the politics of scale. Canadian Geographer, 47, 2, 97115.

K. McHugh 2003. Three faces of ageism: society, image and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 2, 165–85.

E. O'Shea 2006 a. Developing a healthy ageing policy for Ireland: the view from below. Health Policy, 76, 1, 93105.

P. Pierson 1993. When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 4, 595628.

A. Power 2009. Spatial perspectives on voluntarism in learning disability services in Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 2, 299315.

D. Thomson 1991. Selfish Generations? The Ageing of the Welfare State. Bridget Williams, Wellington.

V. Timonen , J. Convery and S. Cahill 2006. Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries. Ageing & Society, 26, 3, 455–74.

P. Townsend 1981. The structured dependency of the elderly: a creation of social policy in the twentieth century. Ageing & Society, 1, 1, 628.

M. J. Turner , T. G. Shields and D. Sharp 2001. Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952–1996. The Gerontologist, 41, 6, 805–18.

S. Verba , K. L. Schlozman , H. Brady and N. H. Nie 1993. Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review, 87, 2, 303–18.

K. Walsh and E. O'Shea 2008. Responding to rural social care needs: older people empowering themselves, others and their community. Health and Place, 14, 4, 795803.

G. Wilson 2002. Globalisation and older people: effects of markets and migration. Ageing & Society, 22, 5, 647–63.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: