Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T17:14:45.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing the resident populations of private and public long-term care facilities over a 15-year period: a study from Quebec, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

GINA BRAVO*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada. Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada.
MARIE-FRANCE DUBOIS
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada. Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada.
NICOLE DUBUC
Affiliation:
Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada. School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.
LOUIS DEMERS
Affiliation:
École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP), Québec, Canada. Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Canada.
DANIÈLE BLANCHETTE
Affiliation:
Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada. Department of Accounting Sciences, Faculty of Business Administration, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.
KAREN PAINTER
Affiliation:
Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada.
CATHERINE LESTAGE
Affiliation:
Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada.
CINTHIA CORBIN
Affiliation:
Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, Canada.
*
Address for correspondence: Gina Bravo, Research Centre on Aging, University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke, 1036 South Belvedere Street, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, J1H 4C4. E-mail: Gina.Bravo@USherbrooke.ca

Abstract

In the province of Quebec, Canada, long-term residential care is provided by two types of facility: privately owned facilities in which care is privately financed and delivered and publicly subsidised accredited facilities. There are few comparative data on the residents served by the private and public sectors, and none on whether their respective population has changed over time. Such knowledge would help plan services for older adults who can no longer live at home due to increased disabilities. This study compared (a) the resident populations currently served by private and public facilities and (b) how they have evolved over time. The data come from two cross-sectional studies conducted in 1995–2000 and 2010–2012. In both studies, we randomly selected care settings in which we randomly selected older residents. In total, 451 residents from 145 settings assessed in 1995–2000 were compared to 329 residents from 102 settings assessed in 2010–2012. In both study periods, older adults housed in the private sector had fewer cognitive and functional disabilities than those in public facilities. Between the two study periods, the proportion of residents with severe disabilities decreased in private facilities while it remained over 80 per cent in their public counterparts. Findings indicate that private facilities care today for less-disabled older adults, leaving to public facilities the heavy responsibility of caring for those with more demanding needs. These trends may impact both sectors' ability to deliver proper residential care.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

An Act Respecting Health Services and Social Services 2005. c.S-4.2. Éditeur officiel du Québec, Assemblée nationale du Québec, Québec, Canada, chap. 32, s. 346.Google Scholar
Bravo, G., Charpentier, M., Dubois, M. F., De Wals, P. and Emond, A. 1998. Profile of residents in unlicensed homes for the aged in the Eastern Townships of Quebec. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159, 2, 143–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bravo, G., Dubois, M. F., Charpentier, M., De Wals, P. and Emond, A. 1999. Quality of care in unlicensed homes for the aged in the Eastern Townships of Quebec. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160, 10, 1441–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Bravo, G., Dubois, M. F., Tardieu, F., De Wals, P. and Tessier, S. 2001. Quality of care provided in Montérégie residential care facilities. Final report submitted to the Regional Agency of Health and Social Services, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. (In French)Google Scholar
Bravo, G., Dubois, M. F., De Wals, P., Hébert, R. and Messier, L. 2002. Relationship between regulatory status, quality of care and 3-year mortality in Canadian residential care facilities: a longitudinal study. Health Services Research, 37, 5, 1181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, M. P. and Keane, W. 2008. Tomorrow's assisted living and nursing homes. In Golant, S. M. and Hyde, J. (eds), The Assisted Living Residence. A Vision for the Future. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 86118.Google Scholar
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation 2012 a. Seniors’ Housing Report. Canada Highlights. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation 2012 b. Seniors’ Housing Report. Quebec. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Carrière, Y., Keefe, J., Légaré, J., Lin, X. and Rowe, G. 2007. Population aging and immediate family composition: implications for future home care services. Genus, LXIII, 1, 1131.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Dubois, M. F., Bravo, G. and Charpentier, M. 2001. Which residential care facilities are delivering inadequate care? A simple case-finding questionnaire. Canadian Journal on Aging, 20, 3, 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golant, S. M. 2008. The future of assisted living residences: a response to uncertainty. In Golant, S. M. and Hyde, J. (eds), The Assisted Living Residence. A Vision for the Future. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Quebec 2003. Home: The First Choice. Policy on Home Care Services. Direction des communications, ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Québec, Canada. (In French)Google Scholar
Government of Quebec 2005. Action Plan 2005–2010 on Services for Dependent Older Adults. Direction des communications, ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Québec, Canada. (In French)Google Scholar
Government of Quebec 2008. The Québec Health and Social Services System in Brief. Direction des communications, ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Québec, Canada.Google Scholar
Grabowski, D. C., Stevenson, D. G. and Cornell, P. Y. 2012. Assisted living expansion and the market for nursing home care. Health Services Research, 47, 6, 2296–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, C., Choiniere, J., Goldmann, M., Jacobsen, F. F., Lloyd, L., McGregor, M., Stamatopoulos, V. and Szebehely, M. 2012. Nursing home staffing standards and staffing levels in six countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44, 1, 8898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hébert, R., Guilbault, J., Desrosiers, J. and Dubuc, N. 2001. The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): a clinical-based instrument for measuring disabilities and handicaps in older people. Geriatrics Today, 4, 3, 141–7.Google Scholar
Howe, A., Jones, A. E. and Tilse, C. 2013. What's in a name? Similarities and differences in international terms and meanings for older peoples’ housing with services. Ageing & Society, 33, 4, 547–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingarfield, S. L., Finn, J. C., Jacobs, I. G., Gibson, N. P., Holman, C. D., Jelinek, G. A. and Flicker, L. 2009. Use of emergency departments by older people from residential care: a population based study. Age & Ageing, 38, 3, 314–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lestage, C., Dubuc, N. and Bravo, G. 2008. Identifying characteristics of residential care facilities relevant to the placement process of seniors. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9, 2, 95101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Cai, X., Mukamel, D. B. and Glance, L. G. 2010. The volume–outcome relationship in nursing home care: an examination of functional decline among long-term care residents. Medical Care, 48, 1, 52–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. E. and Crome, P. 2000. Relocation mosaic – a review of 40 years of resettlement literature. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10, 1, 8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teng, E. L. and Chui, H. C. 1987. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 8, 314–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Vaillancourt, Y. and Bourque, D. 1989. The privatisation of housing services for seniours. Nouvelles pratiques sociales, 2, 1, 5371. (In French)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylde, M. A. 2008. The future of assisted living: residents’ perspectives, 2000–2006. In Golant, S. M. and Hyde, J. (eds), The Assisted Living Residence. A Vision for the Future. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 169–97.Google Scholar
Wysocki, A., Butler, M., Kane, R. L., Kane, R. A., Shippee, T. and Sainfort, F. 2012. Long-term care for older adults: a review of home and community-based services versus institutional care. Report Number 12(13)-EHC134-EF, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Zuliani, G., Romagnoni, F., Volpato, S., Soattin, L., Leoci, V., Bolloni, M. C., Buttarello, M., Lotto, D. and Fellin, R. 2001. Nutritional parameters, body composition, and progression of disability in older disabled residents living in nursing homes. Journals of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 56, 4, M212–6.Google ScholarPubMed