Skip to main content Accessibility help

Financial planning for social care in later life: the ‘shadow’ of fourth age dependency

  • DEBORA PRICE (a1), DINAH BISDEE (a1), TOM DALY (a1), LYNNE LIVSEY (a1) and PAUL HIGGS (a1) (a2)...

As policy makers in the United Kingdom and many other countries grapple with financing the needs of an ageing population, financial planning for social care in later life is high on political agendas. We draw on qualitative research with older couples in the United Kingdom about their intimate money practices to analyse the day-to-day meanings attributed to money, saving and consumption in the context of financial planning for later life and death. We find that expenditure on funerals and home adaptations is discussed, negotiated and planned, as is ‘downsizing’ to release capital from the home for financing day-to-day expenses and leisure expenses. These outcomes are within easy contemplation and indeed money practice of older couples. In contrast, end-of-life planning for domiciliary or residential care was virtually non-existent across all socio-economic groups, and couples employed a range of techniques to avoid making these discussions ‘real’. Costs (while well known) are seen as astronomical, details are scarce, intensive domiciliary care is never discussed, and death is seen as preferable to residential care. We theorise antipathy to care planning as a product of social and psychological construction of the ‘fourth age’ as a period of abjection, and therefore ‘wasted’ expenditure. Exhortations by policy makers for individuals to consider care costs will be ineffective without recognition of the cultural transformation of later life.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Debora Price, Institute of Gerontology, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK. E-mail:
Hide All
Banks, J., Lessof, C., Nazroo, J., Rogers, N., Stafford, M. and Steptoe, A. (eds) 2010. Financial Circumstances, Health and Well-being of the Older Population in England: The 2008 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 4). Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
Burstow, P. 2011. Speech by Paul Burstow at Kings Fund Social Care Reform Event, June 29 2011. Available online at [Accessed 30 June 2011].
Chatzitheochari, S. and Arber, S. 2011. Identifying the Third Agers: an analysis of British retirees’ leisure pursuits. Sociological Research Online, 16, 4, 3.
Dilnot Commission 2011. Commission on Funding of Care and Support. Department of Health. Available online at [Accessed 30 June 2011].
Elsinga, M., Jones, A., Quilgars, D. and Toussaint, J. 2010. Households’ Perceptions on Old Age and Housing Equity. Combined Report WP2. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Estes, C. L. 2001. Crisis, the welfare state and aging. Ideology and agency in the social security privatisation debate. In Estes, C. L. and Associates (eds), Social Policy and Aging – A Critical Perspective. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 95117.
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2010. Aging without agency: theorizing the fourth age. Aging and Mental Health, 14, 2, 121–28.
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2011 a. Ageing, abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 8, 135–42.
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2011 b. Frailty, disability and old age: a re-appraisal. Health, 15, 5, 475–90.
Gjonça, E., Tabassum, F. and Breeze, E. 2006. The socio-demographic characteristics of the ELSA population. In Banks, J., Breeze, E., Lessof, C. and Nazroo, J. (eds), Retirement, Health and Relationships of the Older Population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 2). Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, 1728.
Higgs, P. and Gilleard, C. 2010. Generational conflict, consumption and the ageing welfare state in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 30, 8, 1439–52.
HM Government 2008. The Case for Change – Why England Needs a New Care and Support System. The Stationery Office, London.
HM Government 2009. Shaping the Future of Care Together. Cm7673. The Stationery Office, London.
Hurd, M. D. 1990. Research on the elderly: economic status, retirement, and consumption and saving. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 565637.
Martin, D. 2011. Don't Rely on the State for Care and Accept the ‘Nasty Truth’, Elderly Are Told, 30 June. Available online at [Accessed 30 November 2011].
Mullan, P. 2000. The Imaginary Time Bomb – Why an Ageing Population is Not a Social Problem. I. B. Tauris, London.
Parkinson, S., Searle, B., Smith, S., Stoakes, A. and Wood, G. 2009. Mortgage equity withdrawal in Australia and Britain: towards a wealth-fare state? International Journal of Housing Policy, 9, 4, 365–89.
Peace, S., Holland, C. and Kellaher, L. 2006. Environment and Identity in Later Life. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.
Pensions Policy Institute 2009. Retirement Income and Assets – How Can Housing Support Retirement? Pensions Policy Institute, London.
Phillipson, C. 2000. Intergenerational conflict and the welfare state – American and British perspectives. In Pierson, C. and Castles, F. G. (eds), The Welfare State Reader. Polity Press in Association with Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Massachusetts, 293307.
Polivka, L. 2011. Neoliberalism and postmodern cultures of aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30, 2, 173–84.
Price, D. 2006. Why are older women in the UK poor? Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7, 2, 2332.
Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. 2005. Attitudes to Inheritance in Britain. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK.
Senior, A. 2009. Care in Old Age – We Won't Pay, the State Can't, 20 November. Available online at [Accessed 23 November 2009].
Smith, J. 2004. Exploring attitudes to housing wealth and retirement. Housing Finance, 63, 3444.
Sodha, S. 2005. Housing-rich, Income-poor – The Potential of Housing Wealth in Old Age. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
Stevenson, J. 2008. Planning for the future – long-term care and the 2008 election. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 1985–7.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, London.
Terry, R. and Gibson, R. 2010. Can Equity Release Help Older Home-owners Improve Their Quality of Life? Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK.
Vogler, C., Brockmann, M. and Wiggins, R. 2006. Intimate relationships and changing patterns of money management at the beginning of the twenty-first century. British Journal of Sociology, 57, 3, 456–82.
Vogler, C. and Pahl, J. 1994. Money, power, and inequality within marriage. The Sociological Review, 42, 263–88.
Wanless, D. 2007. Age Old Problems – The Government Cannot Afford to Ignore the Urgent Challenges of How We Pay For, and Provide, Social Care, 25 April. Available online at [Accessed 4 December 2009].
Willetts, D. 2010. The Pinch. How the Baby Boomers Took Their Children's Future – and Why They Should Give it Back. Atlantic Books, London.
Willig, C. 2001. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham, Open University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed