Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life

  • CHRISTINA BUSE (a1), SARAH NETTLETON (a1), DARYL MARTIN (a1) and JULIA TWIGG (a2)

Abstract

This article comprises a sociological analysis of how architects imagine the ageing body when designing residential care homes for later life and the extent to which they engage empathetically with users. Drawing on interviews with architectural professionals based in the United Kingdom, we offer insight into the ways in which architects envisage the bodies of those who they anticipate will populate their buildings. Deploying the notions of ‘body work’ and ‘the body multiple’, our analysis reveals how architects imagined a variety of bodies in nuanced ways. These imagined bodies emerge as they talked through the practicalities of the design process. Moreover, their conceptions of bodies were also permeated by prevailing ideologies of caring: although we found that they sought to resist dominant discourses of ageing, they nevertheless reproduced these discourses. Architects’ constructions of bodies are complicated by the collaborative nature of the design process, where we find an incessant juggling between the competing demands of multiple stakeholders, each of whom anticipate other imagined bodies and seek to shape the design of buildings to meet their requirements. Our findings extend a nascent sociological literature on architecture and social care by revealing how architects participate in the shaping of care for later life as ‘body workers’, but also how their empathic aspirations can be muted by other imperatives driving the marketisation of care.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Christina Buse, Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK E-mail: christina.buse@york.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Allen, J. 2006. Ambient power: Berlin's Potsdamer Platz and the seductive logic of public spaces. Urban Studies, 43, 2, 441–55.
Andersson, J. E. 2015. Architecture and the Swedish welfare state: three architectural competitions that innovated space for dependent and frail older people. Ageing & Society, 35, 4, 837–64.
Aronson, J. and Neysmith, S. M. 1997. The retreat of the state and long-term care provision: implications for frail elderly people, unpaid family carers and paid home care workers. Studies in Political Economy, 53, 3766.
Barnes, S. 2002. The design of caring environments and the quality of life of older people. Ageing & Society, 22, 6, 775–89.
Bland, R. 1999. Independence, privacy and risk: two contrasting approaches to residential care for older people. Ageing & Society, 19, 5, 539–60.
Blythe, M. A. and Wright, P. C. 2006. Pastiche scenarios: fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers, 18, 5, 1139–64.
Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S. and Szebehely, M. 2012. The marketisation of care: rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 4, 377–91.
Bromley, E. 2012. Building patient-centeredness: hospital design as an interpretive act. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 6, 1057–66.
Chalfont, G. E. 2008. The living edge: connection to nature for people with dementia in residential care. In Froggatt, K. A., Davies, S. and Meyer, J. (eds), Understanding Care Homes: A Research and Development Perspective. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, 113–35.
Chalfont, G. E. and Rodiek, S. 2005. Building edge: an ecological approach to research and design of environments for people with dementia. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 6, 4, 341–8.
Davies, S. and Nolan, M. 2003. ‘Making the best of things’: relatives’ experiences of decisions about care-home entry. Ageing & Society, 23, 4, 429–50.
Delhanty, T. 2013. Housing LIN Factsheet 35: Landscape Design for Dementia Care. Housing Learning & Improvement Network, London. Available online at http://www.housinglin.org.uk/_library/Resources/Housing/Support_materials/Factsheets/HLIN_Factsheet35_Landscape.pdf [Accessed January 2016].
Dementia Services Development Centre 2012. The Stirling Standards for Dementia-friendly Design. Available online at http://www.dementiaaction.org.uk/environments [Accessed September 2015].
Fisk, M. J. 2003. Social Alarms to Telecare: Older People's Service in Transition. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
Fotaki, M. and Boyd, A. 2005. From plan to market: a comparison of health and old age care policies in the UK and Sweden. Public Money & Management, 25, 4, 237–43.
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2010. Frailty, disability and old age: a reappraisal. Health, 15, 5, 475–90.
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2011. Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 2, 135–42.
Grosz, E. A. 1995. Space, Time, and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. Routledge, London.
Grosz, E. 2001. Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Gubrium, J. F. 1997. Living and Dying at Murray Manor. University Press of Virginia, Charlotteville, Virginia.
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 1999. The nursing home as a discursive anchor for the ageing body. Ageing & Society, 19, 5, 519–38.
Gullette, M. 1997. Declining to Decline: Cultural Combat and the Politics of the Midlife. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Gutman, R. 2010. Professions and their discontents: the psychodynamics of architectural practice. In Cuff, D. and Wriedt, J. (eds), Architecture from the Outside In: Selected Essays by Robert Gutman. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 4360.
Handler, S. 2014. An Alternative Age-friendly Handbook: For the Socially Engaged Practitioner. University of Manchester Library, Manchester, UK. Available online at http://www.micra.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/Age-friendlyHandbook_LARGE%20PRINT%20VERSION.pdf [Accessed September 2015].
Heathcote, E. 2010. Architecture and health. In Jencks, C. and Heathcote, E. (eds), The Architecture of Hope. Frances Lincoln, London, 5291.
Hockey, J. and James, A. 1993. Growing Up and Growing Old: Ageing and Dependency in the Life-course. Sage, London.
Holden, C. 2002. British government policy and the concentration of ownership in long-term care provision. Ageing & Society, 22, 1, 7994.
Homes and Communities Agency 2009. HAPPI Housing Our Ageing Population: Panel for Innovation. Homes and Communities Agency, London. Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/housing-our-ageing-population-panel-for-innovation [Accessed January 2015].
Imrie, R. 2003. Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and Planning D, 21, 1, 4765.
Imrie, R. 2004. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies, 19, 5, 745–63.
Imrie, R. and Luck, R. 2014. Designing inclusive environments: rehabilitating the body and the relevance of universal design. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 16, 1315–9.
Jacobs, J. and Merriman, P. 2011. Practising architectures. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 3, 211–22.
Jamie, K. 2014. The pharmacy gaze: bodies in pharmacy practice. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36, 8, 1141–55.
Jones, P. 2011. The Sociology of Architecture. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, UK.
Jönson, H. 2012. We will be different: ageism and the temporal constitution of old age. The Gerontologist, 53, 2, 198204.
Kelly, F. 2014. Bodywork in dementia care: recognising the commonalities of selfhood to facilitate respectful care in institutional settings. Ageing & Society, 34, 6, 1073–90.
Kerr, A. 2013. Body work in assisted conception: exploring public and private settings. Sociology of Health and Illness, 35, 3, 465–78.
Kouprie, M. and Sleeswijk-Visser, F. 2009. A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the users’ life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20, 5, 437–48.
Latour, B. and Yaneva, A. 2008. Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move: an ANT's view of architecture. In Geiser, R. (ed.) Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 80–9.
Laws, G. 1997. Spatiality and age relations. In Jamieson, A., Harper, S. and Victor, C. (eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 90100.
Lawton, J. 1998. Contemporary hospice care: the sequestration of the unbounded body and ‘dirty dying’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 2, 121–43.
Leder, D. 1992. The Body in Medical Thought and Practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Lee-Treweek, G. 1997. Women, resistance and care: an ethnographic study of nursing auxiliary work. Work, Employment and Society, 11, 1, 4763.
Lees, L. 2001. Towards a critical geography of architecture: the case of an ersatz Colosseum. Ecumene, 8, 1, 5186.
Lupton, D. 2014. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36, 6, 856–69.
Martin, D., Nettleton, S., Buse, C., Prior, L. and Twigg, J. 2015. Architecture and health care: a place for sociology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37, 7, 1007–22.
Milligan, C., Roberts, C. and Mort, M. 2011. Telecare and older people: who cares where? Social Science & Medicine, 72, 3, 347–54.
Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge, London.
Mort, M., Roberts, C. and Callen, B. 2013. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health and Illness, 35, 6, 799812.
Murphy, K. M. 2004. Imagination as joint activity: the case of architectural interaction. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11, 4, 267–78.
Oldman, C. and Quilgars, D. 1999. The last resort? Revisiting ideas about older people's living arrangements. Ageing & Society, 19, 3, 363–84.
Östlund, B. 2002. The deconstruction of a target group for IT-innovations: elderly users’ technological needs and attitudes towards new IT. Nätverket – Kulturforskning i Uppsala, 11, 7793.
Östlund, B. 2005. Design paradigms and misunderstood technology: the case of older users. In Jaeger, B. (ed.), Young Technologies in Old Hands: An International View on Senior Citizens Utilization of ICT. DJOF Publishing, Copenhagen, 2539.
Pedwell, C. 2014. Affective Relations: The Transnational Politics of Empathy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
Phillipson, C. and Powell, J. L. 2004. Risk, social welfare and old age. In Tulle, E. (ed.), Old Age and Agency. Nova, New York, 1726.
Prentice, R. 2013. Bodies in Formation. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
Prior, L. 1988. The architecture of the hospital: a study of spatial organization and medical knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 39, 1, 86113.
Rees Jones, I. R. and Higgs, P. 2010. The natural, the normal and the normative: contested terrains in ageing and old age. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 8, 1513–9.
Rose, G., Degen, M. and Basdas, B. 2010. More on big things: building events and feelings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, 3, 334–49.
Sang, K. J., Dainty, A. R. and Ison, S. G. 2014. Gender in the UK architectural profession: (re)producing and challenging hegemonic masculinity. Work, Employment & Society, 28, 2, 247–64.
Schillmeier, M. and Domènech, M. 2009. Care and the art of dwelling: bodies, technologies, and home. Space and Culture, 12, 3, 288–91.
Selwyn, N. 2004. The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 4, 369–84.
Sennett, R. 2009. The Craftsman. Penguin, London.
Sennett, R. 2012. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation. Penguin, London.
Shapiro, J. 2008. Walking a mile in their patients’ shoes: empathy and othering in medical students’ education. Philosophy, Ethics and Humanities in Medicine, 3, 10. Available online at http://www.peh-med.com/content/3/1/10 [Accessed September 2015].
Shildrick, M. 2001. Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. Sage, London.
Sloane, D. C. and Sloane, B. C. 2003. Medicine Moves to the Mall. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
Soldatic, K., Morgan, H., and Roulstone, A. (eds) 2014. Disability, Spaces and Places of Policy Exclusion. Routledge, London.
Suri, J. F. 2001. The next 50 years: future challenges and opportunities for empathy in our science. Ergonomics, 44, 14, 1278–89.
Torrington, J. 2006. What has architecture got to do with dementia care? Explorations of the relationship between quality of life and building design in two EQUAL projects. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7, 1, 3448.
Twigg, J. 2012. Adjusting the cut: fashion, the body and age on the UK high street. Ageing & Society, 32, 6, 1030–54.
Twigg, J. and Majima, S. 2014. Consumption and the constitution of age: expenditure patterns on clothing, hair and cosmetics among post-war ‘baby boomers’. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 1, 2332.
Twigg, J., Wolkowitz, C., Cohen, R. L. and Nettleton, S. 2011. Conceptualising body work in health and social care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33, 2, 171–88.
Williams, S. J. 2000. Chronic illness as biographical disruption, or biographical disruptions as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 1, 4067.
Woodward, K. 1991. Aging and its Discontents: Freud and Other Fictions. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
Ylänne, Y. 2012. Representing Ageing: Images and Identities. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.

Keywords

Imagined bodies: architects and their constructions of later life

  • CHRISTINA BUSE (a1), SARAH NETTLETON (a1), DARYL MARTIN (a1) and JULIA TWIGG (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed