Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:30:10.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Meaning of Informal Care: Gender and the Contribution of Elderly People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Sara Arber  and
Jay Ginn
Jay Ginn
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 5XH, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Caring’ and ‘carers’ are words in frequent use in social policy, but their meaning is often vague and undefined, encompassing a wide range of activities and relationships. This paper discusses the meaning of caring and focuses particular attention on older carers. Secondary analysis of the 1985 Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys (OPCS) Informal Carers Survey data shows that of the estimated six million informal carers in Britain, the largest contribution is made by women in their early 60s, and that elderly men are more likely than younger men to be carers. The bulk of informal caring work, in terms of total time spent, is provided by co-resident carers, most of whom are a spouse or parent of the dependant. However, the largest number of those receiving help live in separate households, and these are mainly parents or parents-in-law of their carers. The emphasis on elderly people as a ‘social burden’ neglects their contribution as providers of informal care. Over a third of informal care to people over 65 is provided by elderly people. Elderly men and women provide equal amounts of co-resident care, reflecting gender equality in the care of elderly spouses. But among younger people marked gender differences are apparent in co-resident care, and in the provision of informal care to elderly people living in separate households.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 429 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Department of Health, Caring for People. Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Command 849. HMSO, London, 1989, para. 1.9.Google Scholar

2 Green, H., Informal Carers. OPCS Series GHS, No. 15, Supplement A. OPCS, HMSO, London, 1988.Google Scholar

3 Parker, G., With Due Care and Attention: A Review of Research on Informal Care. Family Policy Studies Centre, London, 1985.Google Scholar

4 Wenger, G. C., The Supportive Network: Coping with Old Age. Allen and Unwin, London, 1984.Google Scholar

5 Nissel, M. and Bonnerjea, L., Family Care of the Handicapped Elderly: Who Pays? Policy Studies Institute, London, 1982.Google Scholar

6 Ungerson, C., Policy is Personal: Sex, Gender and Informal Care. Tavistock, London, 1987.Google Scholar

7 Land, H., Who cares for the family? Journal of Social Policy, 7 (1978), 357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Finch, J. and Groves, D., Community care and the family: a case for equal opportunities? Journal of Social Policy, 9 (1980), 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Finch, J. and Groves, D., By women for women: caring for the frail elderly. Women's Studies International Forum, 5, 5 (1982), 427–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Finch, J. & Groves, D., A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1983.Google Scholar

11 Graham, H., Caring: a labour of loveGoogle Scholar, ibid.

12 Equal Opportunities Commission, The Experience of Caring for Elderly and Handicapped Dependants. EOC, Manchester, 1980.Google Scholar

13 Equal Opportunities Commission, Caring for the Elderly and Handicapped: Community Care Policies and Women's Lives. EOC, Manchester, 1982.Google Scholar

14 Charlesworth, A., Wiikin, D. and Durie, A., Carers and Services: A Comparison of Men and Women Caring for Dependent Elderly People. EOC, Manchester, 1984.Google Scholar

15 Arber, S. and Gilbert, G. N., Transitions in caring: gender, life course and care of the elderly. In Bytheway, B., Keil, T., Allatt, P. & Bryman, A., Becoming and Being Old: Sociological Approaches to Later Life. Sage, London 1989a.Google Scholar

16 Arber, S. and Gilbert, G. N., Men: the forgotten carers. Sociology, 23, 1 (1989b), 111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Bytheway, B., Care in the families of redundant Welsh steelworkers. In di Gregorio, S. (ed.), Social Gerontology: Mew Directions. Croom Helm, London, 1987.Google Scholar

18 Parker, G., The same difference? The experiences of men and women caring for a spouse with a disability or chronic illness. Paper presented to Social Policy Association Conference, University of Bath, July 1989 (mimeo).Google Scholar

19 Green, H., op. cit.Google Scholar

20 Thane, P., Old age: burden or benefit? In Joshi, H. (ed), The Changing Population of Britain. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar

21 Thompson, J., Ageing of the population: contemporary trends and issues. Population Trends, 50 (1987), 18–22.Google Scholar

22 Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Conflict in an Ageing World. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1989.Google Scholar

23 National Institute for Social Work, Social Workers:. Their Roles and Their Tasks (the Barclay Report). Bedford Square Press, London, 1982.Google Scholar

24 DHSS, Growing Older. Command 8173, HMSO, London, 1981.Google Scholar

25 Department of Health, 1989, op. cit.

26 Maclean, U., Dependent Territories: The Frail Elderly and Community Care. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London, 1989.Google Scholar

27 Henwood, M. and Wicks, M., Community care, family trends and social change. Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 1, 4 (1985) 357–71.Google Scholar

28 Henwood, M., Rimmer, L. and Wicks, M., Inside the Family: Changing Roles of Men and Women. Family Policy Studies Centre, London, 1987.Google Scholar

29 Allen, I., Ageing as a feminist issue. Journal of Policy Studies Institute, 9, 2 (1988) 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Gordon, D. S., Older People in Scotland, Volume 2 – Population and Housing. Age Concern Scotland, Edinburgh, 1989.Google Scholar

31 Moroney, R., The Family and the State: Considerations for Social Policy. Longman, London, 1976.Google Scholar

32 Bebbington, A. C., The expectation of life without disability in England and Wales. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 4 (1988), 321–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

33 Wells, N. and Freer, C., The Ageing Population: Burden or Challenge? Macmillan, London, 1989.Google Scholar

34 Thane, D., 1989, op. cit.Google Scholar

35 Finch, J., Family obligations and the life course. In Bryman, A., Bytheway, W. R., Allait, P. and Keil, T., Rethinking the Life Cycle. Macmillan, London, 1987.Google Scholar

36 Finch, J., Social policy, social engineering and the family in the 1990s. In Bulmer, M., Lewis, J. and Piachaud, D. (eds), The Goals of Social Policy. Unwin Hyman, London, 1989.Google Scholar

37 Finch, J., Family Obligations and Social Change. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar

38 Green, H. 1988, op. cit.Google Scholar

39 Equal Opportunities Commission, 1980, op. cit.

40 Charlesworth, A., Wilkin, D. and Durie, A., 1984, op. cit.Google Scholar

41 Qureshi, H. and Walker, A., The Caring Relationship; Elderly People and Their Families. Macmillan, London, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Wenger, G. C., 1984, op. cit.Google Scholar

43 Nissel, M. and Bonnerjea, L., 1982, op. cit.Google Scholar

44 Lewis, J. and Meredith, B., Daughters Who Care: Daughters Caring for Mothers at Home. Routledge, London, 1988.Google Scholar

45 Marsden, D. and Abrahms, S., ‘Liberators’Google Scholar, ‘companions’, ‘intruders’ and ‘cuckoos in the nest’: a sociology of caring relationships over the life cycle. In Allatt, P., Keil, T., Bryman, A. and Bytheway, B. (eds), Women and the Life Cycle. Macmillan, London, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 Ungerson, C., 1987, op. cit.Google Scholar

47 Wright, F. Single carers, employment, housework and caring. In Finch, J. and Groves, D., 1983, op. cit.Google Scholar

48 OPCS, General Household Survey, 1985. HMSO, London, 1987.Google Scholar

49 Green, H., Survey of informal carers: measurement problems. Survey Methodology Bulletin, No. 26 (1990), 17–25Google Scholar, OPCS.

50 Ibid. p. 18.

51 Green, H., 1988, op. cit.Google Scholar

52 Parker, G., 1985, op. cit.Google Scholar

53 Ibid.

54 Green, H., 1988, op. cit., Table 4.20.Google Scholar

55 Pahl, R. E., Divisions of Labour. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar

56 New, C. and David, M., For the Children's Sake? Making Childcare More Than Women's Business. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1985.Google Scholar

57 Hicks, C., Who Cares: Looking after People at Home. London, Virago, 1988.Google Scholar

58 Nissel, M. and Bonnerjea, L., 1982, op. cit.Google Scholar

59 New, C. and David, M., 1985, op. cit.Google Scholar

60 Arber, S., and Gilbert, G. N., 1989a, op. cit.Google Scholar

61 Finch, J. and Mason, J.Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing and Society 10, 2 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Parker, G., 1985, op. cit.Google Scholar

63 Wenger, C., 1984, op. cit.Google Scholar

64 Ungerson, C., 1987, op. cit.Google Scholar

65 Finch, J., 1989, op. cit.Google Scholar

66 Arber, S. and Gilbert, G. N., 1989a, op. cit.Google Scholar

67 Arber, S. and Gilbert, G. N., 1989b, op. cit.Google Scholar

68 Arber, S., Gilbert, G. N. and Evandrou, M., Gender, household composition and receipt of domiciliary services by the elderly disabled. Journal of Social Policy, 17, 2 (1988), 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar