Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:20:08.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rethinking theoretical and methodological issues in intergenerational family relations research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2011

ARIELA LOWENSTEIN*
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Study of Aging and Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
RUTH KATZ
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Study of Aging and Department of Human Services, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
SIMON BIGGS
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Ariela Lowenstein, Center for Research and Study of Aging, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. E-mail: ariela@research.haifa.ac.il

Abstract

This paper introduces some key theoretical and methodological developments in the study of intergenerational family relations. It draws on observations that a number of social issues are emerging that have an intergenerational dimension, that there is growing recognition that to study adult ageing one has also to study intergenerational relationships, and that a new architecture for social relations is beginning to take shape in the wake of demographic change. How individuals, families and societies cope with such changes provokes the question of how gerontologically-informed research, theorisation and policy will also adapt. Seven positions are summarised which attempt two things. First, to map out some new conceptual directions for intergenerational research through a critical use of concepts such as transition, generational self-awareness and empathy, metaphors of cultural translation, and the deployment of social and moral capital. Second, to examine changing gender roles, the balance between family and welfare-state support frameworks, ethnicity and immigration as important elements of this process. A critical review of approaches to intergenerational relationships hopefully emerges.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonucci, T. C., Jackson, J. S. and Biggs, S. 2007. Intergenerational relations: theory, research and policy. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 4, 679–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Lowenstein, A. (eds)2003. Global Aging and Challenges to Families. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Bengston, V. L., Lowenstein, A., Putney, N. and Gans, D. 2003. Global aging and the challenge to families. In Bengston, V. and Lowenstein, A. (eds), Global Aging and Challenges to Families. Walter de Gruyter, New York, 126.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Lowenstein, A. and Hendricks, J. (eds)2003. The Need for Theory: Critical Approaches to Social Gerontology. Baywood, Amityville, New York.Google Scholar
Birren, J. E. and Bengston, V. L. (eds)1988. Emergent Theories of Aging. Springer Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
Izuhara, M. (ed.)2010. Ageing and Intergenerational Relations. Policy, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Phillips, J. and Daatland, S. O. 2005. Theorizing intergenerational solidarity, conflict and ambivalence in a comparative cross-national perspective. In Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Andersen, P. and Klein, D. M. (eds), Sourcebook on Family Theory and Research. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 393407.Google Scholar
Kinsella, K. and Velkoff, V. 2001. An Aging World: 2001. Series P95/01-1, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A. 2005. Global ageing and the challenges to families. In Johnson, M., Bengtson, V. L., Coleman, P. G. and Kirkwood, T. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 403–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 2005. Testing theories about intergenerational exchanges. In Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Andersen, P. and Klein, D. M. (eds), Sourcebook on Family Theory and Research. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 407–10.Google Scholar
United Nations Organisation (UNO) 2002. Report of the Second World Assembly on Ageing: Madrid Political Declaration and International Plan of Action 2002. UNO, New York.Google Scholar