Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T08:10:22.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What childless older people give: is the generational link broken?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

MARCO ALBERTINI  and
MARTIN KOHLI
MARCO ALBERTINI*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
MARTIN KOHLI
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
*
Address for correspondence: Marco Albertini, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Educazione, Università di Bologna, Via Filippo Re, 6, I-40126 – Bologna, Italy E-mail: marco.albertini2@unibo.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the increase of childlessness in European societies, its consequences have become a matter of concern. Studies in this field, however, have concentrated on what childless people lack and need in terms of social, financial and moral support. In contrast, this article focuses on what childless people give to their families, friends, unrelated others and to society at large. Using 2004 data on social support and financial transfers given and received by people aged 50 or more years in ten European countries from the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the analyses show that the support networks of childless older people tend to be somewhat weaker than those of parents and that links with members of the younger generations in the family are stronger for parents than for those without children. The results also indicate, however, that the differences in transfer behaviour between parents and childless adults are small, and that the support networks of the childless are more diverse than those of parents, and characterised by stronger links with ascendants and lateral relatives and with non-relatives. Moreover, people without children tend to be more intensely involved in charities and comparable organisations.

Keywords

childlessnessgenerational linkintergenerational supportintergenerational transfersfamily networkscharitable giving

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 29 , Issue 8: Minimal Families: Childlessness and Intergenerational Transfers , November 2009 , pp. 1261 - 1274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adloff, F. 2009. What encourages charitable giving and philanthropy? Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1183–204.Google Scholar
Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. Zed, London.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. (ed.) 1995. Les solidarités entre générations. Vieillesse, familles, État [Intergenerational Solidarity: Older People, Families and the State]. Nathan, Paris.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Brugiavini, A., Jürges, H., Mackenbach, J., Siegrist, J. and Weber, G. (eds) 2005. Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: First Results from SHARE. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. and Jürges, H. (eds) 2005. The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe: Methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. C. 1976. Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2, 2, 321–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. L. and Badger, M. 1989. Social isolation and well-being. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 44, 5, S169–76.Google Scholar
Choi, N. G. 1994. Patterns and determinants of service utilization: comparisons of the childless elderly and elderly parents living with or apart from their children. The Gerontologist, 34, 3, 353–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connidis, I. A. 2002. The impact of demographic and social trends on informal support for older persons. In Cheal, D. (ed.), Ageing and Demographic Change in Canadian Context. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 105–32.Google Scholar
Da Roit, B. 2007. Changing international solidarities within families in a Mediterranean welfare state. Current Sociology, 55, 2, 251–69.Google Scholar
Eriksen, S. and Gerstel, N. 2002. A labor of love or labor itself: care work among adult brothers and sisters. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 7, 836–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, M. J. and Jurado-Guerrero, T. 2006. Remaining childless in affluent economies: a comparison of France, West Germany, Italy, and Spain, 1994–2001. European Journal of Population, 22, 4, 317–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, M. 2009. Inter-vivos giving by older people in the United States of America: who received financial gifts from the childless? Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1205–24.Google Scholar
Ishii-Kuntz, M. and Seccombe, K. 1989. The impact of children upon social support networks throughout the life course. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 3, 777–90.Google Scholar
Jeffries, S. and Konnert, C. 2002. Regret and psychological well-being among voluntarily and involuntarily childless women and mothers. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 54, 2, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knodel, J., Chayovan, N. and Siriboon, S. 1992. The impact of fertility decline on familial support for the elderly: an illustration from Thailand. Population and Development Review, 18, 1, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M. 1999. Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies, 1, 1, 81–104.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. (eds) 2004. Ageing Without Children: European and Asian Perspectives. Berghahn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nomaguchi, K. M. and Milkie, M. A. 2003. Costs and rewards of children: the effects of becoming parent on adults' lives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 2, 356–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuget, J. B. 1985. The old-age security motive for fertility. Population and Development Review, 11, 1, 75–97.Google Scholar
O'Bryant, S. L. 1985. Neighbors' support of older widows who live alone in their own homes. The Gerontologist, 25, 3, 305–10.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. 2003. Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced and never-married older adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 1, 31–53.Google Scholar
Rendall, M. S. and Bahchieva, R. A. 1998. An old-age security motive for fertility in the United States? Population and Development Review, 24, 2, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, D. T. 2007. Historical trends in childlessness. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 10, 1311–37.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, R. L., Alexander, B. L., Goodman, M. and Luborsky, M. 1991. Key relationships of never-married, childless older women: a cultural analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 46, 5, S270–7.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. and Kreager, P. 2005. Actual and de facto childlessness in old age: evidence and implications from East Java, Indonesia. Population and Development Review, 31, 1, 19–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weitof, G. R., Burstrom, B. and Rosen, M. 2004. Premature mortality among lone fathers and childless men. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 7, 1449–59.Google Scholar
Wenger, G. C. 2009. Childlessness at the end of life: evidence from rural Wales. Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, G. C. and Burholt, V. 2001. Differences over time in older people's relationships with children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews in rural North Wales. Ageing & Society, 21, 5, 567–90.Google Scholar
Wenger, C. G., Scott, A. and Patterson, N. 2000. How important is parenthood? Childlessness and support in old age in England. Ageing & Society, 20, 2, 161–82.Google Scholar