Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2009
1. For an inside view of the history of the project, see Stamm, J. J., “Bericht über den Stand der Arbeit an der 3. Auflage des hebräischen und aramäischen Wörterbuches von Ludwig Koehler und Walter Baumgartner,” Theologische Zeitschrift 45 (1989): 277–289.Google Scholar
2. Probably, the lexeme 
was archaic and had to be updated by the gloss 
. Similarly, the syntax was updated: the expression 
has no definite article; the newer term 
occurs with the definite article. The former usage is typical of the Late Bronze Age (compare Ugaritic, where the definite article is unattested); the latter is typical of the Iron Age, when the innovative definite article was introduced. The lack of a definite article also can be witnessed in Gen. 14:10, where the form 
means ‘to the mountain’ (the Masoretic pointing creates a compromise form in attempting to introduce a definite article; the Samaritan Pentateuch simply presents the newer usage 
). These facts and others point to the relatWe antiquity of Genesis 14; in the widespread debate over the date of this crucial chapter, the linguistic evidence has not been brought to bear.
