Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:25:50.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Analysis of Occupation Floors I: Application of Dimensional Analysis of Variance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert Whallon Jr.
Robert Whallon Jr.*
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A statistical procedure for the analysis of patterns of spatial distribution of artifacts over occupation areas is outlined. This procedure envisions 3 steps: the testing for non-randomness of spatial concentrations in the distribution of each class of artifacts, the reorganization of the data so as to best reflect such concentrations in the analysis of intercorrelation among those artifact classes which exhibit significant spatial patterning, and finally the analysis of spatial intercorrelations among these artifact classes and the definition of clusters of classes of artifacts based on their similarity of distribution over the area concerned. A new statistical method called dimensional analysis of variance is presented as a method with which to begin this series of steps. Dimensional analysis of variance works with data in the form of counts per grid unit, thus making it applicable in many archaeological situations for which no other statistical methods are available for spatial analysis. The procedure of spatial analysis, based on dimensional analysis of variance, is illustrated with the analysis of a preceramic occupation floor in a small cave in the valley of Oaxaca, Mexico.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 266 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

William Bert, Craytor, and Johnson, LeRoy Jr., 1968 Refinements in computerized item seriation. University of Oregon Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 10.Google Scholar
Henry, de Lumley, and others 1969 Une cabane Acheuléenne dans la Grotte du Lazaret (Nice). Société Préhistorique Française, Mémoires 7.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. G Jr., and Butzer, K. W.. 1966 The Acheulean station of Torralba (Spain). A progress report. Quaternaria 8:9–22.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. 1952 The use of random and contiguous quadrats in the study of the structure of plant communities. Annals of Botany n.s. 16:293–316.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. 1961 Data on pattern within plant communities I. The analysis of pattern. Journal of Ecology 49:695–702.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. 1964 Quantitative plant ecology, 2nd. edition. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P., Kershaw, K. A., and Anderson, D. J. 1963 The analysis of pattern in vegetation: a comment on a paper by D. W. Goodall. Journal of Ecology 51:223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, K. A. 1957 The use of cover and frequency in the detection of pattern in plant communities. Ecology 38:291–299.Google Scholar
Kershaw, K. A. 1961 Association and co-variance analysis of plant communities. Journal of Ecology 49:643–654.Google Scholar
Kershaw, K. A. 1964 Quantitative and Dynamic Ecology. American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
André, Leroi-Gourhan, and Brézillon, Michel 1966 L'habitation Magdalenienne No. 1 de Pincevent prés Montereau (Seine-et-Marne). Gallia Préhistoire 9:263–385.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1969 An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York Google Scholar
Thompson, H. R. 1958 The statistical study of plant distribution patterns using a grid of quadrats. Australian Journal of Botany 6:322–342.Google Scholar