Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:15:58.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Zoned Bichrome Period in Northwestern Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael D. Coe  and
Claude F. Baudez
Michael D. Coe
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, Conn.
Claude F. Baudez
Affiliation:
Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an attempt to establish an archaeological chronology for northwestern Costa Rica, excavations were carried out in 1959-60 in the coastal region and Tempisque River drainage of Guanacaste Province. Four periods have been defined: Zoned Bichrome, Early Polychrome, Middle Polychrome, and Late Polychrome. These are roughly equated in the Maya sequence with Late Formative, Early Classic through the beginning of Late Classic, the latter part of the Late Classic through the early Postclassic, and late Postclassic, respectively. The Zoned Bichrome period has been established on the basis of three geographically separate but coeval phases: Chombo on the Santa Elena Peninsula, Monte Fresco in the Tamarindo Bay zone, and Catalina on the middle Tempisque. All three phases are linked to each other through trade pottery; a radiocarbon date on Monte Fresco is within the first century of the Christian era. Outstanding characteristics of the period are bichrome zoning, dentate rocker-stamping, wavy black lines produced by a multiple brush, engraving, and incising. Considerable fishing and hunting was carried out, and intensive maize agriculture is inferred. These village materials indicate that lower Central America was participating in at least some of the trait diffusion which linked remote areas of Nuclear America in Formative times.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , April 1961 , pp. 505 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, W. C. 1944. The North Highlands of Peru. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 39, Pt. 1. New York.Google Scholar
Bosch-Gimpera, Pedro 1959. La Prehistoria del Nuevo Mundo y Centro América. Actes del XXXIII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas [San José, 1958.], Vol. 1, pp. 136–51. Lehmann, San José.Google Scholar
Bransford, J. F. 1881. Archaeological Researches in Nicaragua. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. 25. Washington.Google Scholar
Coe, M. D. 1960. Archeologkal Linkages with North and South America at La Victoria, Guatemala. American Anthropologist, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 363–93. Menasha.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S., Gralenski, L. J., and Hoffren, Väinö 1959. Yale Natural Radiocarbon Measurements IV. American Journal of Science, Radiocarbon Supplement, Vol. 1, pp. 144–72. New Haven.Google Scholar
Evans, Clifford and Meggers, B. J. 1957. Formative Period Cultures in the Guayas Basin, Coastal Ecuador. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, pp. 235–46. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Haberland, Wolfgang 1959. Archäologische Untersuchungen in Südost-Costa Rica. Acta Humboldtiana, Series Geographica et Etnographica, No. 1. Weisbaden.Google Scholar
Hartman, C. V. 1907. Archaeological Researches on the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, Vol. 3, No. 1. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1888. Ancient Art of the Province of Chiriqui, Colombia. Sixth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington.Google Scholar
Kidder, Alfred II 1943. Some Early Sites in the Northern Lake Titicaca Basin. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 27, No. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1926. Pottery of Costa Rica and Nicaragua, two volumes. Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, Contributions, Vol. 8. New York.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1936. Zacualpa, a Study of Ancient Quiche Artifacts. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 472. Washington.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1959. A Re-appraisal of Isthmian Archaeology. In “Amerikanistische Miszellen,” Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Völkerkunde in Hamburg , Vol. 25, pp. 87–91. Ludwig Appel, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Porter, M. N. 1953. Tlatilco and the Pre-Classic Cultures of the New World. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 19. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York.Google Scholar
Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo and de Reichel, Alicia Dussan 1956. Momíl, Excavaciones en el Sinú. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, Vol. 5, pp. 109–334. Bogotá.Google Scholar
Stone, Doris 1958. An Introduction to the Archaeology of Costa Rica. Museo Nacional, San Jose.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1957. Paracas, Nazca, and Tiahuanacoid Cultural Relationships in South Coastal Peru. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 13. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Swauger, J. L. and Mayer-Oakes, W. J. 1952. A Fluted Point from Costa Rica. American Antiquity, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 264–5. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1959. The “Intermediate Area” of Nuclear America. Adas del XXXIII Congreso International de Americanistas [San José, 1958.], Vol. 1, pp. 184–94. San Jose.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. and McGimsey, C. R. 1954. The Monagrillo Culture of Panama. Papers of The Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 49, No. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar