Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T13:14:48.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12. L. S. Shapley and Martin Shubik. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System,”American Political Science Review48 (1954): 787–92 Cited 360 times.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Kenneth A. Shepsle
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Extract

Next to having one's book prominently displayed on the racks of every airport bookstore in the country, receiving recognition for an article written more than half a century ago is a close second. Indeed, for some of us it is the very highest form of intellectual acknowledgment. The Shapley–Shubik power index, invented more than 50 years ago, is a familiar concept in the analytical lexicon of political science. In brief, it is a measure of the ex ante likelihood that an individual will be pivotal in transforming a nonwinning coalition into a winning one. This depends on the voting or decision rule, on the one hand, and on the number of votes or decision weight possessed by an individual, on the other. The “power” of an individual, so determined, may be aggregated to measure the power of a faction, party, proto-coalition, or voting chamber (the latter in a multicameral setting)

Type
“TOP TWENTY” COMMENTARIES
Copyright
© 2006 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachrach Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (December): 94752.Google Scholar
Dahl Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (July): 20115.Google Scholar
Dahl Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
March James G. 1957. “Measurement Concepts in the Theory of Influence.” Journal of Politics 19 (May): 20226.Google Scholar
Riker William H. 1964. “Some Ambiguities in the Notion of Power.” American Political Science Review 58 (June): 34149.Google Scholar