Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-7nm9g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-27T21:07:27.225Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1989

Joanne Gowa
Joanne Gowa*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent literature typically attributes the relative scarcity of open international markets to the prisoner's dilemma structure of state preferences with respect to trade. I argue that the prisoner's dilemma representation does not reflect the most critical aspect of free trade agreements in an anarchic international system: security externalities. Explicit consideration of these effects suggests that a bipolar international political system has an advantage relative to its multipolar counterpart with respect to the opening of markets among states. Less credible exit threats and stronger incentives to engage in altruism within its alliances explain the advantage of a two-power system.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 1245 - 1256
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, David A. 1985. Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W., and Wildasin, David E.. 1984. Public Sector Economics. 2d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Caves, Richard E., and Jones, Ronald W.. 1973. World Trade and Payments: An Introduction. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Collard, David. 1978. Altruism and Economy: A Study in Non-Selfish Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1984. “Public Goods, Prisoner's Dilemmas and the International Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly 28:5–22.10.2307/2600395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1987. Trade Wars. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V., and Stern, Robert M.. 1987. “Current Issues in Trade Policy: An Overview.” In U.S. Trade Policies in a Changing World Economy, ed. Stern, Robert M.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1985. “Arms Races and Cooperation.” World Politics 38:118–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80:1151–69.10.2307/1960861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, George T., and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1982. “Flexibility of Alliance Partner Choice in a Multipolar System: Models and Tests.” International Studies Quarterly 26:511–38.10.2307/3013961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 1988. “Connected Game Analyses of the 1933 World Economic Conference.” Presented at the Domestic Politics and International Relations workshop, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Ethier, Wilfred. 1983. Modern International Economics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeff. 1988. “Sectoral Conflict and U.S. Foreign Economic Policy.” International Organization 42:59–90.10.1017/S002081830000713XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe, Bond, Pat, and Boschman, Irvin. 1984. “Beyond Economic Man: Altruism, Egalitarianism, and Difference Maximizing.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 28:3–24.10.1177/0022002784028001001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1989. “Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods, and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory?” World Politics 41:307–24.10.2307/2010502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Simmons, Beth A.. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes.” International Organization 41:491–517.10.1017/S0020818300027569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1980. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30:167–214.10.2307/2009958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Harry G. 1953. “Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation.” Review of Economic Studies 21:142–53.10.2307/2296006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1983. “The Predatory Theory of Rule.” In The Microfoundations of Macrosociology, ed. Hechter, Michael. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1980. “Magnanimous Albion: Free Trade and British National Income, 1841–1881.” Explorations in Economic History 17:303–20.10.1016/0014-4983(80)90014-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Timothy James. 1982. “The Rise and Decline of the Open Trading Regimes of the Nineteenth Century.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy James. 1983. “Hegemonic Stability Theory and Nineteenth-Century Tariff Levels in Europe.” International Organization 37:73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, John. 1986. Game Theory in International Economics. New York: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, and Roberts, John. 1982. “Limit Pricing and Entry under Incomplete Information: An Equilibrium Analysis.” Econometrica 50:443–59.10.2307/1912637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. “The Sterling-Dollar-Franc Triangle: Monetary Diplomacy 1929–1937.” World Politics 37:173–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1986. “The Political Economy of Peasant Society.” In Rational Choice, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rapkin, David P. 1988. “Concept (Mis)Information in International Systems Research: Polarity and Polarization.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36:379–415.10.1017/S0020818300018993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, William A. 1984. “Trade Controls That Work.” Foreign Policy 56:61–80.10.2307/1148474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1985. “The Mysterious Case of Vanishing Hegemony.” International Organization 39:207–32.10.1017/S0020818300026953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuker, Stephen A. 1976. The End of French Pre-dominance in Europe: The Financial Crisis of 1924 and the Adoption of the Dawes Plan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “The Limitations of Hegemonic Stability Theory.” International Organization 39:579–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. 1984. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics 36:461–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tirole, Jean. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 1980. Reparation in World Politics: France and European Economic Diplomacy, 1916–1923. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/trac92620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 1988. “A Wasting Asset': American Strategy and the Shifting Nuclear Balance, 1949–1954.” International Security 13:5–49.10.2307/2538735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1940. Britain and France between Two Wars: Conflicting Strategies of Peace from Versailles to World War II. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Yarbrough, Robert M.. 1986. “Reciprocity, Bilateralism, and Economic ‘Hostages’: Self-enforcing Agreements in International Trade.” International Studies Quarterly 30:7–22.10.2307/2600434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Yarbrough, Robert M.. 1987. “Cooperation in the Liberalization of International Trade: After Hegemony, What?” International Organization 41:1–26.10.1017/S0020818300000722CrossRefGoogle Scholar