Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-hd9dq Total loading time: 0.476 Render date: 2022-10-03T16:19:41.754Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Aaron Wildavsky*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Preferences come from the most ubiquitous human activity: living with other people. Support for and opposition to different ways of life, the shared values legitimating social relations (here called cultures) are the generators of diverse preferences. After discussing why it is not helpful to conceive of interests as preferences or to dismiss preference formation as external to organized social life, I explain how people are able to develop many preferences from few clues by using their social relations to interrogate their environment. The social filter is the source of preferences. I then argue that culture is a more powerful construct than conceptual rivals: heuristics, schemas, ideologies. Two initial applications—to the ideology of the left-right distinctions and to perceptions of danger—test the claim that this theory of how individuals use political cultures to develop their preferences outperforms the alternatives.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Terrence. 1979. Interest Explanations. Polity 12(2):187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, Lance. 1978. The Jefferson Persuasion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H. 1966. Ideology and the Organization of Conflict: On the Relationship Between Political Thought and Behavior. Journal of Politics 28:513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul R., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloomgarden, Kathy. 1983. Managing the Environment: The Public's View. Public Opinion 6:4751.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry, and Sniderman, Paul. 1985. Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning. American Political Science Review 79:1061–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnson, and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications. American Journal of Political Science 25:617–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnson, and Feldman, Stanley. 1984. How People Organize the Political World. American Journal of Political Science 28:93126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. 1985. The Bear Market in Political Socialization and the Costs of Misunderstood Psychological Theories. American Political Science Review 79:1079–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotgrove, Stephen, and Duff, Andrew. 1980. Environmentalism, Middle-Class Radicalism, and Politics. The Sociological Review 28:333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1970. Natural Symbols. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1982. In the Active Voice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1983. Identity: Personal and Socio-Cultural, Uppsala Studies in Cultural Anthropology, vol. 5, ed. Jacobson-Widding, Anita, 3546.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen. 1985. Economic and Political Rationality. University of Maryland, College Park. Typescript.Google Scholar
Elkins, David J., and Simeon, Richard E. B.. 1979. A Cause in Search of Its Effect; or. What Does Political Culture Explain? Comparative Politics 11:127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Richard, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1986. A Cultural Analysis of the Role of Abolitionists in the Coming of the Civil War. University of California, Berkeley. Typescript.Google Scholar
Gross, Jonathan L., and Rayner, Steve. 1985. Measuring Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hamill, Ruth, Lodge, Milton, and Blake, Frederick. 1985. The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan and Ideological Schemata. American Journal of Political Science 29:850–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. Richard, and March, James G.. 1984. Decision Making and Postdecision Surprise. Administrative Science Quarterly 29:2642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Keith. 1985. Exogenous Factors in Economic Theory: Neo-Classical Economics. Social Science Information 24(3):470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Karl. N.d. Rendezvous With Death: Democratic Kampuchea, 1975–1978. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kalt, Joseph P., and Zupan, Mark A.. 1984. Further Evidence on Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics. American Economic Review 74:279300.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1973. Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lauber, Volkmar. 1983. From Growth Consensus to Fragmentation in Western Europe: Political Polarization over Redistribution and Ecology. Comparative Politics 15:329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1982. The Market as Prison. The Journal of Politics 44:324–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1978. Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9(2):587608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78:734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and Chong, Dennis. 1985. Similarities and Differences between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals. British Journal of Political Science 15:329–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, R. T., and Becker, G. S.. 1976. On the New Theory of Consumer Behavior. In The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, ed. Becker, G. S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W. 1981a. Beliefs about Our Social Paradigm: Are We Moving to a New Paradigm? Paper presented at the twenty-second annual conference of the International Studies Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W. 1981b. The Relationship of Environmental Beliefs and Values to Politics and Government. Paper presented at the fourth annual conference of the International Society for Political Psychology, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1971. Political Culture, Political Structure, Political Change. British Journal of Political Science 1:291305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, John, and Holm, John. 1980. Ideological Voting Is Alive and Well. Public Opinion 3:5258.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, and Lichter, S. Robert. 1985. Elites in Conflict: Nuclear Energy, Ideology, and the Perception of Risk. Journal of Contemporary Studies 8:2344.Google Scholar
Shafir, Michael. 1983. Political Culture, Intellectual Dissent, and Intellectual Consent: The Case of Romania. Orbis 27(1):393401.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagen, Michael G., Tetlock, Philip E., and Brady, Henry E.. 1986. Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics. Stanford. Typescript.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1986. The Process of Perception of Party Issue Position: A Longitudinal and Regional Perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sussman, Glenn. 1986. Postindustrialism and Anti-nuclear Weapons Activism. Paper presented at meetings of the Western Political Science Association, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 1982. The Role of the Centre. In Essays in the Sociology of Perception, ed. Douglas, Mary. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael, and Schwarz, Michiel. 1985. Beyond the Politics of Interest. Paper presented at the thirteenth world congress of the International Political Science Association, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Orren, Gary R.. 1985. Equality in America: The View From the Top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1985a. Idolatry and “The Poor.” Catholicism in Crisis 3:4244.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1985b. A World of Difference: The Public Philosophies and Political Behaviors of Rival American Cultures. University of California, Berkeley. Typescript.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1986. Industrial Politics in American Political Cultures. In The Politics of Industrial Policy, ed. Barfield, Claude E. and Schambra, William A., 1532. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1986. Democracy and the Welfare State: Staatsrason and Wohlfahrtsstaatsrason. University of Wisconsin, Madison. Typescript.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences. American Psychologist 35:151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
480
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *