Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T15:55:58.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collective Action, Clientelism, and Connectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

MAHVISH SHAMI*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
*
Mahvish Shami is LSE Fellow, Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK (m.shami@lse.ac.uk).

Abstract

Backed by studies finding only limited propensity for free-riding when communities have an interest in self-provision, the last few decades have seen a surge of interest in community-based development. A major caveat to the “second wave” of collective action studies, however, is that collective action often breaks down under hierarchical social relationships. This is unfortunate news for developing countries’ rural societies, which are often entrenched in patron-client networks. Using a natural experiment found in the construction of a motorway, the article finds that clientelist relationships do not, in and by themselves, block peasant collective action. Rather, it is the interaction between clientelism and isolation that empowers patrons to block community-based projects. Peasants in connected villages face no such constraints, but instead rely on their patrons’ assistance in collective projects, making the hierarchical network an additional resource.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.