Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T16:51:31.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Democratic State and Redistribution: Whose Interests Are Served?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

MADS ANDREAS ELKJÆR Open the ORCID record for MADS ANDREAS ELKJÆR [Opens in a new window]  and
TORBEN IVERSEN Open the ORCID record for TORBEN IVERSEN [Opens in a new window]
MADS ANDREAS ELKJÆR*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
TORBEN IVERSEN*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, United States
*
Mads Andreas Elkjær, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, mael@ifs.ku.dk.
Torben Iversen, Harold Hitchings Burbank Professor of Political Economy, Department of Government, Harvard University, United States, iversen@fas.harvard.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growing economic inequality has raised concerns that democratic governments are no longer responsive to popular demands for redistribution either because the state capacity is eroded by footloose capital or because the wealthy subvert democracy through the power of money. In this paper we critically assess these conjectures against long-standing arguments about redistribution and insurance under democracy. We test the alternatives on a new comprehensive dataset on income inequality from 17 advanced democracies between 1980 and 2019. We find that before taxes and transfers income inequality has increased markedly everywhere but also that government redistribution has played a critical role in compensating the middle class and to a perhaps surprising degree also the poor. However, the United States is a large outlier.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 117 , Issue 2 , May 2023 , pp. 391 - 406
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahlquist, John. 2017. “Labor Unions, Political Representation, and Economic Inequality.” Annual Review of Political Science 20:409–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, and Iversen, Torben. 2017. “Inequality, Labor Market Segmentation, and Preferences for Redistribution.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben. 2014. “The Political Economy of Ownership: Housing Markets and the Welfare State.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Wenger, Virginia, Wiedemeier, Fiona, Isler, Christian, Knöpfel, Laura, Weisstanner, David, and Engler, Sarah. 2019. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2018 [computer file]. Institute of Political Science [producers]. Bern, Switzerland: University of Berne [distributor].Google Scholar
Autor, David H., Levy, Frank, and Murnane, Richard J.. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Nicholas. 2001. The Welfare State as Piggy Bank: Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science 14:331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, R. A. 1979. “The Direct Estimation of the Equilibrium Response in a Linear Model.” Economic Letters 3 (4): 357–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, Thomas, Chancel, Lucas, and Gethin, Amory. Forthcoming. “Why is Europe More Equal Than the United States?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.Google Scholar
Born, Benjamin, and Breitung, Jörg. 2016. “Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models.” Econometric Reviews 35 (7): 1290–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, Marius R., and Iversen, Torben. 2020. “The Welfare State with Private Alternatives: The Transformation of Popular Support for Social Insurance.” The Journal of Politics 82 (2): 671–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, Menzie D., and Ito, Hiro. 2006. “What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions.” Journal of Development Economics 81 (1): 163–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2016. The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boef, Suzanne, and Keele, Luke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Elkjær, Mads A., and Klitgaard, Michael B.. 2021. “Economic Inequality and Political Responsiveness: A Systematic Review.” Perspectives on Politics, 1–20. doi:10.1017/S1537592721002188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkjær, Mads A., and Iversen, Torben. 2020. “The Political Representation of Economic Interests: Subversion of Democracy or Middle-Class Supremacy?” World Politics 72 (2): 254–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkjær, Mads A., and Iversen, Torben. 2022. “Replication Data for: The Democratic State and Redistribution: Whose Interests Are Served?” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IG6ICN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. 1995. “The Effects of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (3): 551–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Martin. 1999. “Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax.” Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (4): 674–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingrich, Jane, and Häusermann, Silja. 2015. “The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1): 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2009. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Jon, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2002. “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Public Economics 84 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2020. Let Them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Pierson, Paul, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2021. The American Political Economy: Politics, Markets, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassel, Anke, and Palier, Bruno, eds. 2020. Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies: How Have Growth Regimes Evolved? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2018. Politics at Work: How Companies Turn Their Workers into Lobbyists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States—and the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoynes, Hilary, Miller, Douglas, and Schaller, Jessamyn. 2012. “Who Suffers during Recessions?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (3): 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iammarino, Simona, and McCann, Philip. 2013. Multinationals and Economic Geography: Location, Technology, and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2019. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, Philip, Palier, Bruno, and Schwander, Hanna, eds. 2018. Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meghir, Costas, and Phillips, David. 2010. “Labour Supply and Taxes.” In Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, eds. Adam, Stuart, Besley, Timothy, Blundell, Richard, Bond, Stephen, Chote, Robert, Gammie, Malcolm, Johnson, Paul, et al., 202–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirrlees, James A. 1971. “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimal Income Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 38 (2): 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48 (2): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel, and Zucman, Gabriel. 2018. “Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (2): 553–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, K. Sabeel, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2019. “The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism.” Politics and Society 47 (2): 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2016. Risk Inequality and Welfare States. Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan A. 2019. Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democracy from Itself. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saez, Emmanuel, Slemrod, Joel, and Giertz, Seth H.. 2012. “The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review.” Journal of Economic Literature 50 (1): 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saez, Emmanuel, and Zucman, Gabriel. 2019. The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Storper, Michael. 2013. Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016. How Will Capitalism End? Essays on a Failing System. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2018. “Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (4): 938–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbist, Gerlinde, Förster, Michael, and Vaalavuo, Maria. 2012. “The Impact of Publicly Provided Services on the Distribution of Resources: Review of New Results and Methods.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 130. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Elkjær and Iversen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IG6ICN
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Elkjær and Iversen supplementary material

Elkjær and Iversen supplementary material

Download Elkjær and Iversen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.5 MB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.