Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-6pznq Total loading time: 0.306 Render date: 2021-03-08T14:57:26.765Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Exit Strategy: Career Concerns and Revolving Doors in Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2019

MICHAEL E. SHEPHERD
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
HYE YOUNG YOU
Affiliation:
New York University
Corresponding

Abstract

Although the majority of research on revolving-door lobbyists centers on the influence they exercise during their postgovernment careers, relatively little attention is given to whether future career concerns affect the behaviors of revolving-door lobbyists while they still work in government. We argue that the revolving-door incentivizes congressional staffers to showcase their legislative skills to the lobbying market in ways that affect policymaking in Congress. Using comprehensive data on congressional staffers, we find that employing staffers who later become lobbyists is associated with higher legislative productivity for members of Congress, especially in staffers’ final terms in Congress. It also is associated with increases in a member’s bill sponsorship in the areas of health and commerce, the topics most frequently addressed by clients in the lobbying industry, as well as granting more access to lobbying firms. These results provide the systematic empirical evidence of pre-exit effects of the revolving-door among congressional staff.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

We are grateful for comments from Scott Ainsworth, Dan Alexander, Christina Bodea, Joshua Clinton, James Curry, Kentaro Fukumoto, Cindy Kam, Dave Lewis, Melinda Ritchie, Craig Volden, Alan Wiseman, participants at the 2017 Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2018 Asian Political Methodology Meeting, 2018 European Political Science Association Annual Meeting, and the audience members at the Columbia University American Politics Workshop, New York University Political Economy Seminar, University of California Berkeley Research Workshop on American Politics, University of California Riverside Political Economy Seminar, University of Rochester American Politics Workshop, and Conference on Effective Lawmaking at Vanderbilt University. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IN6SFG.

References

Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John. 2017. “Congressional Bills Project.” NSF 00880066 and 0088006. http://www.congressionalbills.org/.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Scott. 1993. “Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence.” The Journal of Politics 55 (1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, and Schoar, Antoinette. 2003. “Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Polices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1169–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Bombardini, Matilde, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2014. “Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process.” The American Economic Review 104 (12): 3885–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Jeffrey. 2005. “The Road to Riches Is Called K Street.” Washington Post June 22. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/21/AR2005062101632.html?noredirect=on.Google Scholar
Blanes i Vidal, Jordi, Draca, Mirko, and Fons-Rosen, Christian. 2012. “Rovolving Door Lobbyists.” The American Economic Review 102 (7): 3731–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, and Drutman, Lee. 2014. “Congressional Staff and the Revolving Door: The Impact of Regulatory Change.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 13 (1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casas, Andreu, Denny, Matthew, and Wilkerson, John. 2019. “More Effective Than We Thought: Accounting for Legislative Hitchhikers Reveals a More Inclusive and Productive Lawmaking Process.” American Journal of Political Science (Forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Sewell. 2011. “Financial Crisis Was Avoidable, Inquiry Finds.” The New York Times Jan 25. https://nyti.ms/2mbZzCF.Google Scholar
Che, Yeon-Koo. 1995. “Revolving Doors and the Optimal Tolerance for Agency Collusion.” The RAND Journal of Economics 26 (3): 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornaggia, Jess, Cornaggia, Kimberly, and Xia, Han. 2016. “Revolving Doors on Wall Street.” Journal of Financial Economics 120 (2): 400–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, Christopher, and Déllis, Arnaud. 2016. “Informational Lobbying and Agenda Distortion.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 32 (4): 762–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto. 2006. “Reglatory Capture: A Review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (2): 203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2012. “Almost 400 Former House Staffers Registered to Lobby in Last Two Years.” Sunlight Foundation Feb 22. https://sunlightfoundation.com/2012/02/22/house-revolving-door/.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and How Politics Became More Corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, Lee, and Furnas, Alexander. 2014. “K Street Pays Top Dollars for Revolving Door Talent.” Sunlight Foundation Jan 21. https://sunlightfoundation.com/2014/01/21/revolving-door-lobbyists-government-experience/.Google Scholar
Egerod, Benjamin. 2017. “Voting for a Career—The Revolving Door Moderates the US Senate.” Working Paper. https://static-curis.ku.dk/portal/files/195769322/draft_12.pdf.Google Scholar
Groll, Thomas, and Ellis, Christopher J.. 2014. “A Simple Model of the Commercial Lobbying Industry.” European Economic Review 70 (C): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groll, Thomas, and Ellis, Christopher J.. 2017. “Repeated Lobbying by Commercial Lobbyists and Special Interests.” Economic Inquiry 55 (4): 1868–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer-And Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard, and Deadorff, Alan. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard, and Wayman, Frank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committee.” American Political Science Review 84 (3): 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard, and Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2018. “Revolving Door Access: Insider Ties, Legislative Allies, and Lobbying on the Afforable Care Act.” Working Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324068570_Revolving_Door_Access_Insider_Ties_Legislative_Allies_and_Lobbying_on_the_Affordable_Care_Act.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Mildenberger, Matto, and Stokes, Leah. 2019. “Legislative Staff and Represenation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Alexander V., Kang, Karam, Montagnes, B. Pablo, and You, Hye Young. 2019. “Lobbyists as Gatekeepers: Theory and Evidence.” Working Paper. http://www.its.caltech.edu/∼avhirsch/LAG_Combined-Draft_20190727.pdf.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Tirole, Jean. 1991. “The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1089–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, and Thomas, Herschel. 2017. Revolving Door Lobbying: Public Service, Private Influence, and the Unequal Representation of Interests. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Law, Marc, and Long, Cheryl. 2012. “What Do Revolving Door Laws Do?The Journal of Law and Economics 55 (2): 421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey, McKay, Amy, and Herbel, Lindsey. 2016. “Who Walks Through the Revolving Door? Examining the Lobbying Activity of Former Members of Congress.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 5 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Francis. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1995. “Information, Access, and Contributions: A Signaling Model of Lobbying.” Public Choice 85 (3/4): 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, Burdett. 1988. The American Politician: Ambition, Entrepreneurship, and the Changing Face of Political Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maske, Todd. 2017. “A Very Particular Set of Skills: Former Legislator Traits and Revolving Door Lobbying in Congress.” American Politics Research 45 (5): 866–86.Google Scholar
McCrain, Joshua. 2018. “Revolving Door Lobbyists and the Value of Congressional Staff Connections.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob, and Nyhan, Brendan. 2017. “The Effects of Congressional Staff Networks in the U.S. House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 745–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan, and Peterson, Erik. 2018. “Improving the Interpretation of Fixed Effects Regression Results.” Political Science Research and Methods 6 (4): 829–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Samuel. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” The Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Eric, Chausow, Lara, Wilhelm, Amber, Guidi, Claudia, Edwards, Sandra, and Marine, Alex. 2015. “Staff Pay Levels for Selected Positions in Senators’ Offices, FY2001–FY2014.” Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44324.pdf.Google Scholar
Petersen, Eric, Reynolds, Parker, and Wilhelm, Amber. 2010. “House of Representatives and Senate Staff Levels in Member, Committee, Leadership, and Other Offices, 1977–2010.” Congressional Research Service. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20100810_R41366_6692732869e63445e02690dc162dcfbfc0bbd8ba.pdf.Google Scholar
Romzek, Barbara, and Utter, Jennifer. 1997. “Congressional Legislative Staff: Political Professionalism or Clerks?American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1251–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1981. “Congressional Staff Turnover and Ties-That-Bind.” American Political Science Review 75 (2): 381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Adolfo. 2006. Do Members of Congress Reward Their Future Employers? Evaluating the Revolving Door Syndrome. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith. 2017. “Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles, and Woon, Jonathan. 2017. “Congressional Committee Assignments, 103rd to 114th Congresses, 1993–2017.” http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data_page.html#2.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabakovic, Haris, and Wollmann, Thomas. 2018. “From Revolving Doors to Regulatory Capture? Evidence from Patent Examiners.” Working Paper. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Herschel, and LaPira, Timothy. 2017. “How Many Lobbyists Are in Washington? Shadow Lobbying and the Gray Market for Policy Advocacy.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 6 (2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2018. “Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Senate.” Journal of Poiltics 80 (2): 731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, David. 1995. Communication in Congress: Members, Staff and the Search for Information. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Wirsching, Elisa. 2018. “The Revolving Door for Political Elites: An Empirical Analysis of the Linkages between Government Officials’ Professional Background and Financial Regulation.” 2018 OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum. https://www.oecd.org/corruption/integrity-forum/academic-papers/Wirsching.pdf.Google Scholar
Wright, John. 1990. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 417–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Wentong. 2015. “The Revolving Door.” The Notre Dame Law Review 90 (3): 1265–308.Google Scholar

Shepherd and You Dataset

Link

Shepherd and You supplementary material

Online Appendix

PDF 2 MB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 262
Total number of PDF views: 953 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th September 2019 - 8th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Exit Strategy: Career Concerns and Revolving Doors in Congress
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Exit Strategy: Career Concerns and Revolving Doors in Congress
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Exit Strategy: Career Concerns and Revolving Doors in Congress
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *