Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-8dvf2 Total loading time: 0.35 Render date: 2022-09-28T21:17:51.585Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2013

YOTAM MARGALIT*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
Yotam Margalit is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Columbia University, 420 W. 118th Street, New York, NY 10027 (ym2297@columbia.edu).

Abstract

To what extent do personal circumstances, as compared to ideological dispositions, drive voters’ preferences on welfare policy? Addressing this question is difficult because a person's ideological position can be an outcome of material interest rather than an independent source of preferences. The article deals with this empirical challenge using an original panel study carried out over four years, tracking the labor market experiences and the political attitudes of a national sample of Americans before and after the eruption of the financial crisis. The analysis shows that the personal experience of economic hardship, particularly the loss of a job, had a major effect on increasing support for welfare spending. This effect was appreciably larger among Republicans than among Democrats, a result that was not simply due to a “ceiling effect.” However the large attitudinal shift was short lived, dissipating as individuals’ employment situations improved. The results indicate that the personal experience of an economic shock has a sizable, yet overall transient effect on voters’ social policy preferences.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan, and Saunders, Kyle. 2005. “Why Can't We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America.” The Forum 3 (2), DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward L.. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Ferrara, Eliana La. 2005. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (5–6): 897931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Giuliano, Paola. 2010. “Preferences for Redistribution.” In Handbook for Social Economics, ed. Bisin, A. and Benhabib, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Pontusson, Jonas. 2007. “Workers, Worries and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L. M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bean, C., and Papadakis, E.. 1998. “A Comparison of Mass Attitudes Towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985–1990.” International Journal of Public Opinion 10 (3): 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. American Governance and Public Policy, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, C., and Manza, J. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Eric, Ross, Stephen L., and Washington, Ebonya. 2011. “Economics and Policy Preferences: Causal Evidence of the Impact of Economic Conditions on Support for Redistribution and Other Ballot Proposals.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (3): 888906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgard, Sarah A., Brand, Jennie E., and House, James S.. 2007. “Toward a Better Estimation of the Effect of Job Loss on Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 48 (4): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. “Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind.” International Organization 55: 509–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, B., Koster, F., and van Egmond, M. 2012. Support for Redistribution and the Paradox of Immigration. Journal of European Social Policy 22 (3): 288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72: 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1979. “Do People Want Something for Nothing: Public Opinion on Taxes and Government Spending.” National Tax Journal 32 (2): 29s.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald P. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” In Research in Micropolitics, ed. Shapiro, Robert. Vol. 3, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2006. “Risks At Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (3): 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliason, Marcus, and Storrie, Donald. 2009. “Does Job Loss Shorten Life?Journal of Human Resources 44 (2): 277302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Cohen, Jeffrey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Stoker, Laura. N.d. “Caught in the Draft: The Effects of Vietnam Draft Lottery Status on Political Attitudes.” American Political Science Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey. 1997. “Political Ideology and Popular Beliefs about Class and Opportunity: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” The British Journal of Sociology 48 (3): 450–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 268307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fong, Christina. 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 82: 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Carolyn L. 2000. “The Dual Influence of Self-Interest and Societal Interest in Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (1): 3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, and Park, David. 2007. “Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut?Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (4): 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald P. 1999. “Misperceptions About Perceptual Bias.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paola, and Zingales, Luigi. 2003. “People's Opium? Religion and Economic Attitudes.” Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1): 225–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, and Kelly, John. 2011. Parties, Elections, and Policy Reforms in Western Europe: Voting for Social Pacts. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E., and Stephens, J. D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” The American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–93.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Louis S., LaLonde, Robert J., and Sullivan, Daniel G.. 1993. “Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers.” The American Economic Review 83 (4): 685709.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. M. 2008. Does Left-Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20 (3): 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sears, David O.. 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 414–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Kathleen, and Erikson, Robert S.. 1997. “Ideology in the 1990s.” In Understanding Public Opinion, eds. Norrander, Barbara and Wilcox, Clyde. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 91110.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63 (5): 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, Staffan, and Svallfors, Stefan. 2007. “Social Stratification and Political Articulation: Why Attitudinal Class Differences Vary Across Countries.” In Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State, eds. Mau, Steffen and Veghte, Benjamin. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1946.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. A. 2008. The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linos, K., and West, M.. 2003. “Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution: Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation.” European Sociological Review 19: 393409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., and Taber, C.. 2000. “Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Reasoning.” In Elements of Political Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Rationality, eds. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M., and Popkin, S.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2011. “The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 105 (02): 316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J., and Myrskyla, M.. 2009. “Always the Third Rail? Pension Income and Policy Preferences in European Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1068–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, and Margalit, Yotam. 2010. “Short-Term Communication Effects or Longstanding Dispositions? The Public's Response to the Financial Crisis of 2008.” The Journal of Politics 72 (03): 852–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabella. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2011. “Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in US Elections.” American Political Science Review 105: 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mughan, Anthony. 2007. “Economic Insecurity and Welfare Policy Preferences: A Micro-Level Analysis.” Comparative Politics 89: 914–27.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., and Shapiro, R. Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. American Politics and Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2011. “Big Government and Public Opinion.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, eds. Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Inequality And Prosperity: Social Europe Vs. Liberal America. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P. 2001. “You Must Remember This: A Test of the Online Model.” Journal of Politics 63: 2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philip. 2009. “Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 7 (2): 855–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philip. 2011. “Social Policy by Popular Demand.” World Politics 63 (2): 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Douglas. 2007. “Samping for Web Surveys.” Paper presented at the 2007 Joint Statistical Meetings, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?Journal of Political Economy 106 (5): 9971032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36 (2): 379415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2006. “Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. “Self-interest in Americans’ Political Opinions.” In Beyond Self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 147–70.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y. 2009. “From Depression to Depression? Seventy-Five Years of Public Opinion toward Welfare.” Paper presented at the Annual Fall Research Conference of the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC, Nov. 5–7.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, and Schram, Sanford F.. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” The American Political Science Review 101 (1): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2000. Class and Party in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Daniel, and von Wachter, Till. 2009 a. “Average Earnings and Long-Term Mortality: Evidence from Administrative Data.” The American Economic Review 99 (2): 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Daniel, and von Wachter, Till. 2009 b. “Job Displacement and Mortality: An Analysis Using Administrative Data.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3): 1265–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. 2001. “Welfare Reform in the UK.” In Welfare States Under Pressure, ed. Taylor-Gooby, P.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn, and Rivers, Douglas. 2008. “The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18 (4): 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “The ‘More for Less’ Paradox: Public Attitudes on Taxing and Spending.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (3): 310–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Margalit Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Margalit Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 902 KB
264
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *