Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-vl2kb Total loading time: 0.254 Render date: 2021-11-28T20:27:44.223Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Global Competition and Brexit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2018

ITALO COLANTONE*
Affiliation:
Bocconi University
PIERO STANIG*
Affiliation:
Bocconi University
*
Italo Colantone is an Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management and Baffi-Carefin Research Centre. Address: Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, 20136, Milan, Italy (italo.colantone@unibocconi.it).
Piero Stanig is an Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management and Dondena Research Centre. Address: Bocconi University, Via Roentgen 1, 20136, Milan, Italy (piero.stanig@unibocconi.it).

Abstract

We show that support for the Leave option in the Brexit referendum was systematically higher in regions hit harder by economic globalization. We focus on the shock of surging imports from China over the past three decades as a structural driver of divergence in economic performance across U.K. regions. An IV approach supports a causal interpretation of our finding. We claim that the effect is driven by the displacement determined by globalization in the absence of effective compensation of its losers. Neither overall stocks nor inflows of immigrants in a region are associated with higher support for the Leave option. A positive association only emerges when focusing on immigrants from EU accession countries. The analysis of individual data suggests that voters respond to the import shock in a sociotropic way, as individuals tend to react to the general economic situation of their region, regardless of their specific condition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Laura Brogi, Matteo Greco, and Giorgio Pietrabissa for excellent research assistance. We thank Tommaso Aquilante, Guido Tabellini, Maurizio Zanardi, seminar participants at the Royal Economic Society Conference in Bristol, the editor, Ken Benoit, and three anonymous referees for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn S.. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Meredith, Marc, and Snowberg, Erik. 2014. “Mecro-Economic Voting: Local Information and Micro-Perceptions of the Macro-Economy.” Economics & Politics 26 (3): 380410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, Lord. 2016. “How the United Kingdom Voted on Thursday and Why.” Lord Ashcroft Polls. Accessed September 15, 2016. http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why.Google Scholar
Auer, Raphael, and Fischer, Andreas M.. 2010. “The Effect of Low-Wage Import Competition on U.S. Inflationary Pressure.” Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (4): 491503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, and Hanson, Gordon H.. 2013. “The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States.” American Economic Review 103 (6): 2121–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, and Hanson, Gordon H.. 2016. “The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade.Annual Review of Economics 8: 205–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H., and Song, Jae. 2014. “Trade Adjustment: Worker Level Evidence.Quarterly Journal of Economics 129: 1799–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H., Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon H., and Majlesi, Kaveh. 2016. “Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure.” NBER Working Paper No. w22637. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22637Google Scholar
Beatty, Christina, and Fothergill, Steve. 2013. “Hitting the Poorest Places Hardest: The Local and Regional Impact of Welfare Reform.” Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, U.K. http://www4.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/sites/shu.ac.uk/files/hitting-poorest-places-hardest_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., Fetzer, Thiemo, and Novy, Dennis. 2016. “Who Voted for Brexit? A Comprehensive District-Level Analysis.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 11954. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2949802Google Scholar
Bell, Brian, and Machin, Stephen. 2016. “Brexit and Wage Inequality.” VoxEU (blog). Retrieved September 15, 2016. http://voxeu.org/article/brexit-and-wage-inequality.Google Scholar
Bernard, Andrew B., Jensen, Bradford J., and Schott, Peter K.. 2006. “Survival of the Best Fit: Exposure to Low-Wage Countries and the (Uneven) Growth of U.S. Manufacturing Plants.” Journal of International Economics 68 (1): 219–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas, Draca, Mirko, and Van Reenen, John. 2016. “Trade-Induced Technical Change: The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity.” Review of Economic Studies 83 (1): 87117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouard, Sylvain, and Tiberj, Vincent. 2006. “The French Referendum: The Not So Simple Act of Saying Nay.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (2): 261–8.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. “Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties That Bind.” International Organization 55 (3): 509–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2012. “Partisan Embedding of Liberalism: How Trade, Investment, and Immigration Affect Party Support for the Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (5): 606–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, Yi, Lu, Yi, Pierce, Justin R., Schott, Peter K., and Tao, Zhigang. 2016. “Does Trade Liberalization with China Influence U.S. Elections?” NBER Working Paper No. w22178. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22178Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher, and Wong, Cara. 1997. “Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” The Journal of Politics 59 (3): 858–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Stephen, and Whittaker, Matthew. 2016. “The Importance of Place: Explaining the Characteristics Underpinning the Brexit Vote across Different Parts of the U.K.” Unpublished manuscript, Resolution Foundation, London, U.K. http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/2016/07/Brexit-vote-v4.pdf.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Christopher, and Nevitte, Neil. 2014. “Scapegoating: Unemployment, Far-Right Parties and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment.” Comparative European Politics 12 (1): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantone, Italo, Crinò, Rosario, and Ogliari, Laura. 2015. “The Hidden Cost of Globalization: Import Competition and Mental Health.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10874. http://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=10874Google Scholar
Darvas, Zsolt. 2016. “Brexit Should Be a Wake Up Call in the Fight against Inequality.” EUROPP. Accessed September 15, 2016. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/Google Scholar
De Vreese, Claes H., and Semetko, Holli A.. 2004. “News Matters: Influences on the Vote in the Danish 2000 Euro Referendum Campaign.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (5): 699722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhingra, Swati, Ottaviano, Gianmarco, Van Reenen, John, and Wadsworth, Jonathan. 2016. “Brexit and the Impact of Immigration on the U.K.” CEP Brexit Analysis paper No. 05. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/BREXIT/abstract.asp?index=5053Google Scholar
Dippel, Christian, Gold, Robert, and Heblich, Stephan. 2015. “Globalization and Its (Dis-)Content: Trade Shocks and Voting Behavior.” NBER Working Paper No. w21812. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21812Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fajgelbaum, Pablo D., and Khandelwal, Amit K.. 2016. “Measuring the Unequal Gains from Trade.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (3): 1113–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S. 2000. Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (4): 432–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael J.. 2010. “Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude C. 2009. Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude C., Ehrlich, Sean D., and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. “Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis.” International Organization 59 (2): 473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2007. “Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipsos MORI. 2016. “Britain Remains Split as 9 in Ten Say They Would Not Change Their Referendum Vote.” Ipsos MORI. Accessed September 15, 2016. http://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/britain-remains-split-9-ten-say-they-would-not-change-their-referendum-voteGoogle Scholar
Jeannet, Anne-Marie T. 2016. “Mass Attitudes towards the European Union: The Role of Internal Migration.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Political Science Association, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Jensen, Bradford J., Quinn, Dennis P., and Weymouth, Stephen. 2016. “Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on U.S. Presidential Voting.” NBER Working Paper No. w21899. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21899Google Scholar
Kayser, Mark A. 2007. “How Domestic is Domestic Politics? Globalization and Elections.Annual Review of Political Science 10: 341–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Peress, Michael. 2012. “Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 661–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerling, Achim. 2016. “The End of Work or Work without End? How People’s Beliefs about Labour Markets Shape Retirement Politics.” Journal of Public Policy 36 (1): 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandelwal, Amit. 2010. “The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders.” Review of Economic Studies 77 (4): 1450–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (2): 129–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langella, Monica, and Manning, Alan. 2016. “Who Voted Leave: The Characteristics of Individuals Mattered, but So Did Those of Local Areas.” British Politics and Policy. Accessed September 15, 2016. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/explaining-the-vote-for-brexitGoogle Scholar
Margalit, Yotam. 2012. “Lost in Globalization: International Economic Integration and the Sources of Popular Discontent.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (3): 484500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria. 2006. “Who Is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (3): 510– 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?European Economic Review 49 (6): 1393–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren M. 2003. “Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants.” Social Forces 81 (3): 909–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mughan, Anthony, Bean, Clive, and McAllister, Ian. 2003. “Economic Globalization, Job Insecurity and the Populist Reaction.” Electoral Studies 22 (4): 617–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. “Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-Level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 855–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1997. “Has Globalization Gone Too Far?California Management Review 39 (3): 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36 (2): 379415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1994. “Trade, Protectionism and the Future of Welfare Capitalism.” Journal of International Affairs 48 (1): 111.Google Scholar
Samii, Cyrus. 2016. “Causal Empiricism in Quantitative Research.” The Journal of Politics 78 (3): 941–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew F.. 2007. “A New Deal for Globalization.Foreign Affairs 86: 34.Google Scholar
Sides, John, and Citrin, Jack. 2007. “European Opinion About Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 477504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springford, John, McCann, Philip, Los, Bart, and Thissen, Mark. 2016. “Brexiting Yourself in the Foot: Why Britain’s Eurosceptic Regions Have Most to Lose from EU Withdrawal.” Centre for European Reform Insights. Accessed September 15, 2016. http://www.cer.eu/insightsGoogle Scholar
Timmer, Marcel P., Dietzenbacher, Erik, Los, Bart, Stehrer, Robert, and Vries, Gaaitzen J.. 2015. “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production.” Review of International Economics 23 (3): 575605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Stefanie. 2010. “Globalization and the Welfare State: Testing the Microfoundations of the Compensation Hypothesis.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (2): 403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Colantone and Stanig Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Colantone and Stanig supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Colantone and Stanig supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 200 KB
166
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Global Competition and Brexit
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Global Competition and Brexit
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Global Competition and Brexit
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *