Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:11:18.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Are Politicians Informed? Witnesses and Information Provision in Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2022

PAMELA BAN Open the ORCID record for PAMELA BAN [Opens in a new window] ,
JU YEON PARK Open the ORCID record for JU YEON PARK [Opens in a new window]  and
HYE YOUNG YOU Open the ORCID record for HYE YOUNG YOU [Opens in a new window]
PAMELA BAN*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, United States
JU YEON PARK*
Affiliation:
University of Essex, United Kingdom
HYE YOUNG YOU*
Affiliation:
New York University, United States
*
Pamela Ban, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, United States, pmban@ucsd.edu.
Ju Yeon Park, Lecturer, Department of Government, University of Essex, United Kingdom, jp20761@essex.ac.uk.
Hye Young You, Assistant Professor, Wilf Family Department of Politics, New York University, United States, hyou@nyu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How are politicians informed and who do politicians seek information from? The role of information has been at the center for research on legislative organizations but there is a lack of systematic empirical work on the information that Congress seeks to acquire and consider. To examine the information flow between Congress and external groups, we construct the most comprehensive dataset to date on 74,082 congressional committee hearings and 755,540 witnesses spanning 1960–2018. We show descriptive patterns of how witness composition varies across time and committee and how different types of witnesses provide varying levels of analytical information. We develop theoretical expectations for why committees may invite different types of witnesses based on committee intent, interbranch relations, and congressional capacity. Our empirical evidence shows how committees’ partisan considerations can affect how much committees turn to outsiders for information and from whom they seek information.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 122 - 139
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, Andrew, and Curry, James. 2021. “Minority Party Capacity in Congress.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1388–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey S., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1992. “The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Leech, Beth. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Drutman, Lee. 2016. “Is Congress Working as It Should? Depends on Who You Are.” Vox, September 15. https://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2016/9/15/12932742/is–congress–working.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2016. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public Version 2.0. [computer file]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. https://data.stanford.edu/dime.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Christenson, Dino, and Craig, Alison. 2019. “Cue-Taking in Congress: Interest Group Signals from Dear Colleague Letters.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Robert. 1980. “Motivations in Legislative Information Use.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (3): 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasher, Holly. 2006. “Listening to Hearings: Legislative Hearings and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Research 34 (5): 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgat, Casey, and Hunt, Charles. 2020. “How Committee Staffers Clear the Runway for Legislative Action in Congress.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform, eds. LaPira, Timothy, Drutman, Lee, and Kosar, Kevin, 112–27. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1999. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crosson, Jesse, Furnas, Alexander, and Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2020. “Polarized Pluralism: Organized Preferences and Biases in the American Pressure System.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosson, Jesse, Furnas, Alexander, Lapira, Timothy, and Burgat, Casey. 2021. “Partisan Competition and the Decline in Legislative Capacity among Congressional Offices.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 745–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christopher. 2015. “House Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses.” Congressional Research Service. Updated August 25, 2015. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/98-304.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher, and Smith, Steven. 1997. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin. 2004. The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin. 2007. “Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John. 2012. Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heitshusen, Valerie. 2017. “Senate Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses.” Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RS/98-336.Google Scholar
Huber, John, Shipan, Charles, and Pfahler, Madelaine. 2001. “Legislative and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 330–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huitt, Ralph K. 1954. “The Congressional Committee: A Case Study.” American Political Science Review 48 (2): 340–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eddie Bernice. 2019. “Experts Needed: Options for Improved Science and Technology Advice for Congress.” U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, & Technology. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-116hhrg38483/html/CHRG-116hhrg38483.htm.Google Scholar
Kim, In Song. 2018. “LobbyView: Firm-level Lobbying & Congressional Bills Database.” https://www.lobbyview.org.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1997. “Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideologial Bias, and Congressional Committees.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosar, Kevin. 2020. “Legislative Branch Support Agencies: What They Are, What They Do, and Their Uneasy Position in Our System of Government.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform, eds. Drutman, Lee, LaPira, Timothy, and Kosar, Kevin, 128–41. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, George, and O’Connell, Anne Josephe. 2016. “Experiential Learning and Presidential Management of the U.S Federal Bureaucracy: Logic and Evidence from Agency Leadership Appointment.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 914–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schickler, Eric. 2016. Investigating the President. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, Drutman, Lee, and Kosar, Kevin. 2020. “Overwhelmed: An Introduction to Congress’s Capacity Problem.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform, eds. Drutman, Lee, LaPira, Timothy, and Kosar, Kevin, 1–7. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2015. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 2003. President and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M. 1995. “Interest Group Resources and Testimony at Congressional Hearings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (3): 431–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2020. “Prioritized Interests: Diverse Lobbying Coalitions and Congressional Committee Agenda Setting.” Journal of Politics 82 (1): 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Robert J. 2013. “Congressional Oversight Hearings and Policy Control.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 349–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 1989. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2017. “A Lab Experiment on Committee Hearings: Preferences, Power, and a Quest for Information.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2021. “When Do Politicians Grandstand? Measuring Message Politics in Committee Hearings.” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2022. “Electoral Rewards for Political Grandstanding: Evidence from Congressional Committee Hearings.” Working Paper. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JhV16vJr_iUxZPC7bd9pJ-gNq6zw_zHp/view.Google Scholar
Phinney, Robin. 2017. Strange Bedfellows: Interest Group Coalitions, Diverse Partners, and Influence in American Social Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. 2005. “Deliberation and Decision Making.” In The Legislative Branch, eds. Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., 314–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J., and Bendix, William. 2011. “Deliberation in Congress.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, eds. Edwards, George III, Lee, Frances E., and Schickler, Eric, 550–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J., Bendix, William, and Bachtiger, Andre. 2018. “Institutional Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, eds. Bachtiger, Andre, Dryzek, John, Mansbridge, Jane, and Warren, Mark, 273–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Mark, Clinton, Joshua, and Lewis, David. 2017. “Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill.” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 303–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel. 2015. When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, Jones, Philip, You, Hye Young, Burch, Tracy, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry. 2015. “Organizations and the Democratic Representation of Interests: What Does It Mean When Those Organizations Have No Members?” Perspectives on Politics 13 (4): 1017–29.Google Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith. 2017. “Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles III, and Woon, Jonathan. 2017. “Congressional Commitee Assignments, 103rd to 114th Congresses, 1993–2017.” http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data_page.html#2.Google Scholar
Tudor, Grant, and Warner, Justin. 2019. “Congress Should Revive the Office of Technology Assessment. Here’s How To Do It.” Brookings Institute. December 18. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2019/12/18/congress-should-revive-the-office-of-technology-assessment-heres-how-to-do-it/.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Yackee, Susan Webb. 2006. “A Bias toward Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 128–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Ban et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TKRHZU
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Ban et al. supplementary material

Ban et al. supplementary material

Download Ban et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.5 MB