Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-n4bck Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-08-09T19:16:40.371Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

JASON BARABAS
JASON BARABAS
Affiliation:
Harvard University and Southern Illinois University
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theorists argue that deliberation promotes enlightenment and consensus, but scholars do not know how deliberation affects policy opinions. Using the deliberative democracy and public opinion literatures as a guide, I develop a theory of opinion updating where citizens who deliberate revise their prior beliefs, particularly when they encounter consensual messages. A key aspect of this model is that opinion strength moderates the deliberative opinion change process. In two separate propensity score analyses using panel survey data from a deliberative forum and cross-sectional surveys, I show how deliberation and discussion both affect opinions toward Social Security reform. However, deliberation differs from ordinary discussion in that participants soften strongly held views, encounter different perspectives, and learn readily. Thus, deliberation increases knowledge and alters opinions, but it does so selectively based on the quality and diversity of the messages as well as the willingness of participants to keep an open mind.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 98 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 687 - 701
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen Christopher H. 1992. “Breaking the Iron Triangle: Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression.” Political Behavior 14 (September): 195– 211.Google Scholar
Adorno Theodor.W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
Althaus Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92 (September): 545– 58.Google Scholar
Alvarez R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Asch Solomon. 1951. “Effects of Group Pressure on Modification and Distortion of Judgment.” In Groups, Leadership and Men, ed. Harold Guetzkow. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
Barabas Jason. 2000. “Americans Discuss Social Security: How Deliberation Affects Public Opinion.” Ph.D. diss. Northwestern University.
Barabas Jason. 2004. “Virtual Deliberation: Knowledge from Online Interaction versus Ordinary Discussion.” In Democracy Online: The Prospects for Democratic Renewal Through the Internet, ed. Peter Shane. New York: Routledge, 239– 52.
Bartels Larry M. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 (June): 267– 85.Google Scholar
Bartels Larry M. 1996. “Uniformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (February): 194– 230.Google Scholar
Bayes Thomas. [1763] 1958. “An Essay Toward Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.” Philosophical Translations of the Royal Society, 330– 418. (Reprinted, with biographical note by G. A. Barnard, in Biometrika 45: 293–315.Google Scholar
Bessette Joseph M. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy & American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Chong Dennis. 1993. “How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties.” American Journal of Political Science 3 (August): 867– 99.Google Scholar
Cohen Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Policy, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 17– 34.
Cohen Joshua. 1996. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference, ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 95– 109.
Converse Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David Apter. New York: Free Press.
Cook Fay Lomax, and Lawrence R. Jacobs. 1998. Deliberative Democracy in Action: Evaluation of Americans Discuss Social Security. Report to the few Charitable Trusts. Evanston, IL: North-Western University Institute for Policy Research.
Correll Joshua, Steven J. Spencer, and Mark P. Zanna. 2004. “An Affirmed Self and an Open Mind: Self-affirmation and Sensitivity to Argument Strength.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (May): 350– 57.Google Scholar
Cramer-Walsh Katherine. 2003. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crandall Christian, Amy Eshleman, and Laurie O'Brien. 2002. “Social Norms and the Expression and Suppression of Prejudice: The Struggle for Internalization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (March): 359– 79.Google Scholar
Crosby Ned. 1995. “Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions.” In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, ed. O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann. Boston: Kluwer, 157– 74.
Dahl Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dehejia Rajeev H., and Sadek Wahba. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (December): 1053– 62.Google Scholar
Delli-Carpini Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Denver David, Gordon Hands, and Bill Jones. 1995. ”Fishkin and the Deliberative Opinion Poll: Lessons from a Study of the Granada 500 Television Program.” Political Communication 12 (April): 147– 56.Google Scholar
Druckman James N., and Kjersten R. Nelson. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (October): 729– 45.Google Scholar
Elster Jon. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman Stanley. 1995. “Answering Survey Questions: The Measurement and Meaning of Public Opinion.” In Political Judgment: Structure and Process, ed. M. Lodge and K. McGraw. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 249– 70.
Fishkin James S. 1995. The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Fishkin James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 1999. “Bringing Deliberation to Democratic Dialogue.” In A Poll with a Human Face, ed. Maxwell McCombs and Amy Reynolds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3– 38.
Fraser Nancy. 1991. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig J. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109– 42.
Gastil John. 2000. By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gastil John, and James P. Dillard. 1999. “Increasing Political Sophistication through Public Deliberation.” Political Communication 16 (February): 3– 23.Google Scholar
Gramlich Edward. 1998. Is It Time to Reform Social Security? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Greene William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greider William. 1992. Who Will Tell the People. New York: Touchstone.
Gutmann Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Habermas Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas Jürgen. 1997. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hardin Russell. 1999. “Deliberation: Method, Not Theory.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 103– 19.
Huckfeldt Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt Robert, and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Imai Kosuke. N.d. “Do Get-Out-The-Vote Calls Reduce Turnout? The Importance of Statistical Methods for Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review. Forthcoming.
Janis Irving L. [1972] 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Jones Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago.
King Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95 (March): 49– 70.Google Scholar
Kuklinski James H., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, and Robert F. Rich. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62 (August): 790– 816.Google Scholar
Leamer Edward E. 1978. Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Nonexperimental Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Levine Gary M., Jamin B. Halberstadt, and Robert L. Goldstone. 1996. “Reasoning and the Weighting of Attributes in Attitude Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (February): 230– 40.Google Scholar
Manin Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15 (August): 338– 68.Google Scholar
Mansbridge Jane. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo. New York: Oxford University Press, 211– 42.
McLeod Jack M., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Patricia Moy. 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation.” Political Communication 16 (July): 315– 36.Google Scholar
Mendelberg Tali, and John Oleske. 2000. “Race and Public Deliberation.” Political Communication 17 (April): 169– 91.Google Scholar
Mill John Stuart. [1859] 1947. On Liberty. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.
Mondak Jeffery J. 2000. “Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge.” Political Analysis 8 (Winter): 57– 82.Google Scholar
Mutz Diana C. 2002. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (March): 111– 26.Google Scholar
Mutz Diana, and Paul Martin. 2001. “Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 95 (March): 97– 114.Google Scholar
Page Benjamin I. 1996. Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Page Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1999. “The Rational Public and Beyond” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, ed. Stephen L. Elkin and Karol Edward Soltan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 93– 115.
Petty Richard E., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1995. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenbaum Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (April): 41– 55.Google Scholar
Sanders Lynn M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (June): 347– 77.Google Scholar
Shadish William R., Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sherman Robert P. 2000. “Tests of Certain Types of Ignorable Nonresponse in Surveys Subject to Item Nonresponse or Attrition.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (April): 362– 74.Google Scholar
Vinokur Amiram, and Eugene Burnstein. 1974. “The Effects of Partially Shared Persuasive Arguments on Group Induced Shifts: A Group Problem Solving Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29 (March): 305– 15.Google Scholar
Vinokur Amiram, and Eugene Burnstein. 1978. “Depolarization of Attitudes in Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (August): 872– 85.Google Scholar
Ward James D. 2004. Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions. Albany, NY: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.
Wilson Thomas, D., and John Schooler. 1991. “Thinking too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (February): 181– 92.Google Scholar
Young Iris Marion. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference, ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 120– 35.
Zaller John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller John, and Stanley Feldman. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (August): 579– 616.Google Scholar
239
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *