Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vcb8f Total loading time: 0.421 Render date: 2022-09-30T07:13:39.468Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2011

ALAN S. GERBER*
Affiliation:
Yale University
JAMES G. GIMPEL*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
DONALD P. GREEN*
Affiliation:
Yale University
DARON R. SHAW*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
*
Alan S. Gerber is Professor, Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, P.O. Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520 (alan.gerber@yale.edu).
James G. Gimpel is Professor, Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (jgimpel@gvpt.umd.edu).
Donald P. Green is Professor, Department of Political Science and Director, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, P.O. Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520 (donald.green@yale.edu).
Daron R. Shaw is Professor, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, University Station A1800, Austin, TX 78712 (dshaw@austin.utexas.edu).

Abstract

We report the results of the first large-scale experiment involving paid political advertising. During the opening months of a 2006 gubernatorial campaign, approximately $2 million of television and radio advertising on behalf of the incumbent candidate was deployed experimentally. In each experimental media market, the launch date and volume of television advertising were randomly assigned. In order to gauge movement in public opinion, a tracking poll conducted brief telephone interviews with approximately 1,000 registered voters each day and a brief follow-up one month after the conclusion of the television campaign. Results indicate that televised ads have strong but short-lived effects on voting preferences. The ephemeral nature of these effects is more consistent with psychological models of priming than with models of on-line processing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Breaking the Iron Triangle: Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regression in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14: 195211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almon, Shirley. 1965. “The Distributed Lag Between Capital Appropriations and Expenditures.” Econometrica 33: 178–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amemiya, Takeshi. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Amemiya, Takeshi, and Morimune, Kimio. 1974. “Selecting the Optimal Order of Polynomial in the Almon Distributed Lag.” Review of Economics and Statistics 56 (3): 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B.. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 444–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., and Iyengar, S.. 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D., Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam. 1999. “Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout.” American Political Science Review 93: 901–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, and Clinton, Joshua D.. 2006. “Does Advertising Exposure Affect Turnout?Quarterly Journal of Political 2: 2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball-Rokeach, Sandra J., Rokeach, Milton, and Grube, Joel W.. 1984. The Great American Values Test: Influencing Behavior and Belief Through Television. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. 2002. “Sex, Lies, and War: How Soft News Brings Foreign Policy to the Inattentive Public.” American Political Science Review 96: 91109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 388405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Raymond R., and Srull, Thomas K.. 1988. “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising.” Journal of Consumer Research 15: 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and Lapinski, John S.. 2004. “‘Targeted’ Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 66: 6996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Kaplan, Ethan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 11871234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, Michael M., Freedman, Paul B., Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Ridout, Travis N.. 2008. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul, Franz, Michael, and Goldstein, Kenneth. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 723–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Paul, and Goldstein, Kenneth. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 11891208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan. 2004. “Does Campaign Spending Work?American Behavioral Scientist 47: 541–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 1998. “Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 794818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GilliamFranklin D., Jr. Franklin D., Jr. and Iyengar, Shanto. 2000. “Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 560–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Vavreck, Lynn. 2008. “Analysis of Cluster-Randomized Experiments: A Comparison of Alternative Estimation Approaches.” Political Analysis 16 (2): 138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugtvedt, Curtis P., Schumann, David W., Schneier, Wendy L., and Warren, Wendy L.. 1994. “Advertising Repetition and Variation Strategies: Implications for Understanding Attitude Strength.” Journal of Consumer Research. 21: 176–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havlena, William J. and Graham, Jeffrey. 2004. “Decay Effects in Online Advertising: Quantifying the Impact of Time Since Last Exposure on Branding Effectiveness.” Journal of Advertising Research 44: 327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Seth J., Lo, James, Vavreck, Lynn, and Zaller, John R.. 2010. “How Quickly We Forget: Campaign Advertising and Electoral Advantage” Working Paper, UCLA Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C., Lumsdaine, A., and Sheffield, F.. 1949. Experiments in Mass Communication: Studies of Social Psychology in World War II. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory, and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2007. “Uncovering the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.” American Journal of Political Science 24: 957–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1982. “Experimental Demonstration of the Not-So-Minimal Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review 76: 848–58.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 72: 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Brady, Henry, and Crete, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Hagen, Michael G., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2004. The 2000 Presidential Elections and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, George G., Hill, R. Carter, Griffiths, William E., Lutkepohl, Helmut, and Lee, Tsoung-Chao. 1988. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaid, Lynda Lee. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (8): 1085–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, J. T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2008. “Do Televised Presidential Ads Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Politics 70: 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, H.. 1944. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco, and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89: 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1996. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming Hypothesis.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Mutz, Diana, Brody, Richard A., and Sniderman, Paul M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas, and Green, Donald P.. 2008. “Field Experiments Testing the Impact of Radio Advertisements on Electoral Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 156–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 93: 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57: 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vakratsas, Demetrios, and Ambler, Tim. 1999. “How Advertising Works: What Do We Really Know?Journal of Marketing 63: 2643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and Williams, Dmitri. 2004. “The Impact of Political Advertising on Knowledge, Internet Information Seeking, and Candidate Preference.” Journal of Communication 54: 337–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavreck, Lynn. 2007. “The Exaggerated Effects of Advertising on Turnout: The Dangers of Self-reports.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2: 325–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1996. “The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Mutz, Diana, Brody, Richard A., and Sniderman, Paul M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1778.Google Scholar
Zielske, Hubert, and Henry, Walter. 1980. “Remembering and Forgetting Television Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising Research 20: 713.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gerber supplementary material

Appendices

Download Gerber supplementary material(File)
File 86 KB
236
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *