Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.473 Render date: 2022-10-05T08:10:42.166Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2012

STEPHAN HAGGARD*
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego
ROBERT R. KAUFMAN*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
*
Stephan Haggard is Lawrence and Sallye Krause Distinguished Professor, Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 (shaggard@ucsd.edu).
Robert R. Kaufman is Professor, Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, 89 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 (kaufrutger@aol.com).

Abstract

Recent work by Carles Boix and Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson has focused on the role of inequality and distributive conflict in transitions to and from democratic rule. We assess these claims through causal process observation, using an original qualitative dataset on democratic transitions and reversions during the “third wave” from 1980 to 2000. We show that distributive conflict, a key causal mechanism in these theories, is present in just over half of all transition cases. Against theoretical expectations, a substantial number of these transitions occur in countries with high levels of inequality. Less than a third of all reversions are driven by distributive conflicts between elites and masses. We suggest a variety of alternative causal pathways to both transitions and reversions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2000. “Democratization or Repression?European Economics Review 44 (4–6): 683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 938–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David. 2010. “Inequality and Democratization: A Contractarian Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1543–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Chris, and Phongpaichit, Pasuk. 2002. Thailand: Economy and Politics. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. “Is Causal-process Observation an Oxymoron?Political Analysis 14 (3): 347–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2010. “Causal Process ‘Observation’: Oxymoron or (Fine) Old Wine.” Political Analysis 18 (4): 499505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2008. “Economic Roots and Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World.” World Politics 60 (3): 390437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles 2011. “Democracy, Development, and the International System.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 809–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry, Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E. 1997. “Comparative Democracy and Income Distribution: Shape and Direction of the Causal Arrow.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 148–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2004. “Classifying Political Regimes: A Six-fold Measure of Democracies and Dictatorships.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Raymond Vreeland, James. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143 (1/2): 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David. 1979. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2010. “Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, eds. Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 161200.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2005. “Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (4): 625–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy; Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1998. Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dutt, Pushan, and Mitra, Devashish. 2008. “Inequality and the Instability of Polity and Policy.” Economic Journal 118 (531): 12851314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David L., Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 551–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. 2010. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2008. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 756—78.Google Scholar
Freeman, John R., and Quinn, Dennis P.. 2012. “The Economic Origins of Democracy Reconsidered.” American Political Science Review 106 (1): 5880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 882–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratic Transitions after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and McKeown, Timothy J.. 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” Advances in Information Processing in Organizations 2: 2158.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2006. “Single-outcome Studies: A Methodological Primer.” International Sociology 21 (5): 707–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007a. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007b. “The Mechanismic Worldview: Thinking inside the Box.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 161–79.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms: Yes, but. . ..” Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 327–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, Myriam. 1997. “Niger: Regime Change, Economic Crisis and the Perpetuation of Privilege.” In Political Reform in Francophone Africa, eds. Clark, John F. and Gardinier, David. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 86108.Google Scholar
Graham, Yao. 1985. “The Politics of Crisis in Ghana: Class Struggle and Organization, 1981–1984.” Review of African Political Economy 12 (34): 5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Ron, James. 2009. “Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes?World Politics 61 (2): 360401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert R., and Teo, Terence. 2012. “Distributive Conflict and Regime Change: A Qualitative Dataset.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/18276 V1 (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Hedstrom, Peter, and Ylikoski, Petri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 4967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houle, Christian 2009. “Inequality and Democracy: Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect Democratization,” World Politics 61 (4): 589622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hutchful, Eboe. 1997. “Military Policy and Reform in Ghana.” Journal of Modern African Studies 35 (2): 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, Hyung Baeg. 1987. “The Rise of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South Korea.” World Politics 39 (2): 231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven, eds. 2006. Patrons or Policies? Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kricheli, Ruth, and Livne, Yair. 2011. “Mass Revolutions vs. Elite Coups.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1449852 (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Kubik, Jan 1994. The Power of Symbols against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, Peter. 2000. “A Decade of Electoral Democracy: Continuity, Change, and Crisis in Paraguay.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 19 (3): 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Perez-Linan, Anibal. 2009. “Regimes, Competition, and Military Coups in Latin America.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1449035 (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Renee. 1996. Burundi: Ethnic Conflict and Genocide. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Stepan, Alfred. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Londregan, John B., and Poole, Keith T.. 1990. “Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power.” World Politics 42 (2): 151–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Kricheli, Ruth. 2010. “Political Order and One-party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, Daniel, and Perez-Linan, Anibal. 2001. “Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 3765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1963. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith. 2010. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2009. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Marshall, Donna Ramsey. 2010. Coup d'état Events, 1946–2009. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles 2003. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGowan, Patrick K. 2007. “African Military Intervention Events, January 1, 1955, to December 31, 2006.” Arizona State University. Dataset.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 917–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A., Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, eds. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 1994. “Is Inequality Harmful for Economic Growth?American Economic Review 84: 600–21.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2009. “Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 291321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reenock, Christopher, Bernhard, Michael, and Sobek, David. 2007. “Regressive Socioeconomic Distribution and Democratic Survival.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 677–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kevin W. S. 1977. “Voting over Income Tax Schedules.” Journal of Public Economics 8 (3): 329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas. 1975. “Individual Welfare, Majority Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax.” Journal of Public Economics 4 (2): 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?Review of Politics 36 (1): 85131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Smith, Benjamin. 2012. “Economic Origins of Democratic Breakdown? The Redistributive Model and the Postcolonial State.” University of Chicago. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 2001. Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teorell, Jan. 2010. Determinants of Democratization: Explaining Regime Change in the World, 1972–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udo, Augustine. 1985. “Class, Party Politics, and the 1983 Coup in Nigeria.” Africa Spectrum 20 (3): 327–38.Google Scholar
University of Texas Inequality Project. 2008. Estimated Household Income Inequality (EHII) Dataset. http://utip.gov.utexas.edu/data.html (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2003. “Democratization and Power Resources 1850–2000.” FSD1216, version 1.0 (2003-03-10). University of Tampere, Department of Political Science. Finnish Social Science Data Archive. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/english/data/catalogue/FSD1216/meF1216e.html (accessed June 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. “Neoliberalism and Neopopulism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (3): 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Lawrence, ed. 1996. The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. World Development Indicators 2010. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Haggard and Kaufman supplementary material

Supplementary data

Download Haggard and Kaufman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 709 KB
113
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *