Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-7j4dq Total loading time: 0.5 Render date: 2022-09-29T14:39:16.149Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2012

Ohio State University
Yale University
Yale University
Philipp Rehm is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Ohio State University and Max Weber Fellow, European University Institute; 154 N. Oval Mall, 2140 Derby Hall, Columbus, OH 43210 (
Jacob S. Hacker is Stanley Resor Professor of Political Science and Director, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511 (
Mark Schlesinger is Professor of Health Policy, Yale University School of Public Health, Room 304 LEPH, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06520 (


Popular support for the welfare state varies greatly across nations and policy domains. We argue that these variations—vital to understanding the politics of the welfare state—reflect in part the degree to which economic disadvantage (low income) and economic insecurity (high risk) are correlated. When the disadvantaged and insecure are mostly one and the same, the base of popular support for the welfare state is narrow. When the disadvantaged and insecure represent two distinct groups, popular support is broader and opinion less polarized. We test these predictions both across nations within a single policy area (unemployment insurance) and across policy domains within a single polity (the United States, using a new survey). Results are consistent with our predictions and are robust to myriad controls and specifications. When disadvantage and insecurity are more correlated, the welfare state is more contested.

Research Article
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Alesina, Alberto, and Angeletos, George-Marios. 2005. “Fairness and Redistribution.” American Economic Review 95 (4): 960–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Glaeser, Edward, and Sacerdote, Bruce. 2001. “Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-style Welfare State?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001 (2): 187254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Ferrara, Eliana La. 2005. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (5/6): 897931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Pontusson, Jonas. 2007. “Workers, Worries, and Welfare States: Social Protection and Job Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (2): 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, Wil, and Gelissen, John. 2001. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?Acta Sociologica 44: 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Peter. 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Colleen L., Brescoll, Victoria L., Brownell, Kelly D., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2009. “Obesity Metaphors: How Beliefs about the Causes of Obesity Affect Support for Public Policy.” Milbank Quarterly 87 (1): 747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bean, Clive, and Papadakis, Elim. 1998. “A Comparison of Mass Attitudes towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985–1990.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10 (3): 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Ok, Efe A.. 2001. “Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 447–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, Roland, and Tirole, Jean. 2006. “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2): 699746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, Morten, and Quadagno, Jill. 2003. “Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations.” European Sociological Review 19 (5): 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondal, Sveinbjorn, and Pearson, Mark. 1995. “Unemployment and Other Non-employment Benefits.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11 (1): 136–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006a. “Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 474–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006b. “Why Do Welfare States Persist?Journal of Politics 68 (4): 816–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72 (4): 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Sara R., Kriss, Jennifer L., Doty, Michelle M., and Rustgi, Sheila D.. 2008. Losing Ground: How the Loss of Adequate Health Insurance Is Burdening Working Families. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Cook, Fay Lomax, and Barrett, Edith J.. 1992. Support for the American Welfare State: The Views of Congress and the Public. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo, and Grüner, Hans Peter. 2000. “Social Limits to Redistribution.” American Economic Review 90 (5): 14911507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, Richard M. 1980. Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy: Attitudes toward Taxes and Spending in the Industrialized Societies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2006. “Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution.” Oxford Review Economic Policy 22 (3): 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeBell, Matthew, Krosnick, Jon A., and Lupia, Arthur. 2010. Methodology Report and User's Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Dominitz, Jeff, and Manski, Charles F.. 1997. “Perceptions of Economic Uncertainty. Evidence from the Survey of Economic Expectations.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61: 261–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2007. EU Labour Force Survey Database: User Guide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fellner, Gerlinde, and Sutter, Matthias. 2009. “Causes, Consequences, and Cures of Myopic Loss Aversion: An Experimental Investigation.” Economic Journal 119 (537): 900916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, Christina. 2001. “Social Preferences, Self-interest, and the Demand for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 82: 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelissen, John. 2002. Worlds of Welfare, Worlds of Consent? Public Opinion on the Welfare State. Leiden the Netherlands: Brill Academic.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingrich, Jane R., and Ansell, Ben W.. N.d. “Preferences in Context: Micro Preferences, Macro-Contexts and the Demand for Social Policy.” Comparative Political Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Ben, and Rehm, Philipp. 2008. “Categorical Variables in Public Opinion.” Presented at the Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-take-all Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer, and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., Rehm, Philipp, and Schlesinger, Mark. 2010. Standing on Shaky Ground: Americans’ Experiences with Economic Insecurity. (accessed February 27, 2012).Google Scholar
Howell, David R., and Rehm, Miriam. 2009. “Unemployment Compensation and High European Unemployment: A Reassessment with New Benefit Indicators.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25 (1): 6093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO). 2010. LABORSTA [database]. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
ISSP Research Group. 2006. International Social Survey Programme (ISSP): Role of Government IV. Distributor: GESIS Cologne Germany ZA4700, Data Version 1.0 (2008-08-18).Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 875–95.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Mads Meier. 2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 25 (6): 723–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., and Thaler, Richard H.. 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Shin-Goo, and Powell, G. Bingham. 2010. “Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1014–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, Olli E. 1997. “Self-interest and the Common Good: The Impact of Norms, Selfishness and Context on Social Policy Opinions.” Journal of Socio-Economics 26 (5): 475–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, Olli E., and Svallfors, Stevan. 1995. In the Eye of the Beholder: Opinions on Welfare and Justice in Comparative Perspective. Umea, Sweden: Scandbook.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. “The Effect of Public Opinion on Social Policy Generosity.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (4): 727–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Miriam, Ruggles, Steven, Alexander, Trent, Leicach, Donna, and Sobek, Matthew. 2009. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 2.0. [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63 (5): 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttmer, Erzo F. P. 2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy 109 (3): 500528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Julia, and Gollust, Sarah E.. 2010. “Playing Fair: Fairness Beliefs and Health Policy Preferences in the United States.” Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 35 (6): 849–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manski, Charles F. 2004. “Measuring Expectations.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1329–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk. Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (October): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Peter B., and Osborne, Anastasiya M.. 2005. “Proposed Category System for 1960–2000 Census Occupations.” BLS Working Paper (383). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
Miron-Shatz, Talya. 2009. “‘Am I Going to Be Happy and Financially Stable?’ How American Women Feel When They Think about Financial Security.” Judgment and Decision Making 4 (1): 102–12.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl O., and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859–74.Google Scholar
Moene, Karl O., and Wallerstein, Michael. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis.” World Politics 55 (July): 485516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mughan, Anthony. 2007. “Economic Insecurity and Welfare Preferences. A Micro-level Analysis.” Comparative Politics 39 (3): 293310.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C., and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1997. “Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-based Judgements of Fairness and Well-being.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 284308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2009. Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 1995. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 551–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2009. “Risks and Redistribution: An Individual-level Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 855–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2011a. “Risk Inequality and the Polarized American Electorate.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, Philipp. 2011b. “Social Policy by Popular Demand.” World Politics 63 (2): 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, L., and Arvai, Joseph. 2007. “Win Some, Lose Some: The Effect of Chronic Losses on Decision Making under Risk.” Journal of Risk Research 10 (8): 1085–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?Journal of Political Economy 106 (5): 9971032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2005. “Insider–outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2004. “Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 662–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2006. “Religion and Preferences for Social Insurance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeni, Robert F. 2002. “Does Unemployment Insurance Displace Familial Assistance?Public Choice 110 (1/2): 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, Hans-Werner. 1995. “A Theory of the Welfare State.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97 (4): 495526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, Hans-Werner. 1996. “Social Insurance, Incentives, and Risk Taking.” International Tax and Public Finance 3: 259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1991. “Targeting within Universalism: Politically Viable Policies to Combat Poverty in the United States.” In The Urban Underclass, eds. Jencks, Christopher and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 411–36.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 2004. “Class, Attitudes and the Welfare State: Sweden in Comparative Perspective.” Social Policy and Administration 38 (2): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, Peter A. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter, Dean, Hartley, Munro, Moira, and Parker, Gillian. 1999. “Risk and the Welfare State.” British Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 177–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varian, Hal R. 1980. “Redistributive Taxation as Social Insurance.” Journal of Public Economics 14: 4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vroman, Wayne. 2007. “Replacement Rates and UC Benefit Generosity.” (accessed February 27, 2012).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rehm et al. supplementary material

Supplementary tables and figures

Download Rehm et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 136 KB
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *