Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 0.323 Render date: 2022-05-27T05:15:51.946Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2022

MATTHEW TYLER*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, United States
SHANTO IYENGAR*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, United States
*
Matthew Tyler, Postdoctoral Scholar, Democracy and Polarization Lab, Stanford University, United States, mdtyler@stanford.edu.
Shanto Iyengar, Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, United States, siyengar@stanford.edu.

Abstract

Early socialization research dating to the 1960s showed that children could have a partisan identity without expressing polarized evaluations of political leaders and institutions. We provide an update to the socialization literature by showing that adolescents today are just as polarized as adults. We compare our findings to a landmark 1980 socialization study and show that distrust in the opposing party has risen sharply among adolescents. We go on to show that the onset of polarization in childhood is predicted by parental influence; adolescents who share their parents’ identity and whose parents are more polarized are apt to voice polarized views.

Type
Letter
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, and Adamic, Lada A.. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348 (6239): 1130–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, Albert. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 2001. “Ingroup Identification and Intergroup Conflict: When Does Ingroup Love Become Outgroup Hate?” In Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction, eds. Ashmore, Richard D., Jussim, Lee and Wilder, David, 1741. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 2016. “Intergroup Discrimination: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, eds. Sibley, Chris G. and Barlow, Fiona Kate, 90110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Amy, and Teten, Ryan L.. 2002. “Assessing Changing Views of the President: Revisiting Greenstein’s Children and Politics.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Richard E., Prewitt, Kenneth, and Dawson, Karen S.. 1977. Political Socialization, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Levendusky, Matthew S.. 2019. “What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (1): 114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. 1960. “The Benevolent Leader: Children’s Images of Political Authority.” American Political Science Review 54 (4): 934–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershey, Marjorie Randon, and Hill, David B.. 1975. “Watergate and Preadults’ Attitudes toward the President.” American Journal of Political Science 19 (4): 703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, Robert D., and Torney, Judith V.. 1967. The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert 1959. Political Socialization: A Study in the Psychology of Political Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Konitzer, Tobias, and Tedin, Kent. 2018. “The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1326–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J. 2019. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sears, David O.. 1985. “Public Opinion and Political Action.” In Handbook of Social Psychology 2, eds. Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Eliot, 659741. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ojeda, Christopher, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2015. “Accounting for the Child in the Transmission of Party Identification.” American Sociological Review 80 (6): 1150–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, Zoe M., Holman, Mirya R., Greenlee, Jill S., Bos, Angela L., and Lay, J. Celeste. 2020. “Children’s Views of the American Presidency.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (1): 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Meagan M., Bigler, Rebecca S., Pahlke, Erin, Brown, Christia Spears, Amy Roberson Hayes, M. Chantal Ramirez, and Nelson, Andrew. 2019. “Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 84 (3): 7185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Erik, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2021. “Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?American Journal of Political Science 65 (1): 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2017. “The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider.” October 5. https://www.pewresearch.org/Politics/2017/10/05/The-Partisan-Divide-On-Political-Values-Grows-Even-Wider/.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. 1975. “Political Socialization.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 2, eds. Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N., 96136. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. 1983. “The Person-Positivity Bias.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (2): 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Dennis, Jack, and Chaffee, Stephen. 2015. Wisconsin Political Socialization Study, 1980 (M129). Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/T2VX6K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 1997. “Politics Matters: Political Events as Catalysts for Preadult Socialization.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 4565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and Whitney, Richard E.. 1973. Political Persuasion. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Tedin, Kent L. 1974. “The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents.” American Political Science Review 68 (4): 1579–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Matthew. 2022. “Code Ocean Capsule for: Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization.” https://doi.org/10.24433/Co.4103928.V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Matthew, and Shanto, Iyengar. 2022. “Replication Data for: Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TMJWIA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Deth, Jan W., Abendschön, Simone, and Vollmar, Meike. 2011. “Children and Politics: An Empirical Reassessment of Early Political Socialization.” Political Psychology 32 (1): 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Tyler and Iyengar supplementary material

Tyler and Iyengar supplementary material

Download Tyler and Iyengar supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 622 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Tyler and Iyengar Dataset

Link

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Learning to Dislike Your Opponents: Political Socialization in the Era of Polarization
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *