Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-6pjjk Total loading time: 0.35 Render date: 2023-01-27T10:41:36.868Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Mass Purges: Top-Down Accountability in Autocracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2019

B. PABLO MONTAGNES*
Affiliation:
Emory University
STEPHANE WOLTON*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
*
*B. Pablo Montagnes, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Emory University, pablo.montagnes@emory.edu.
Stephane Wolton, Associate Professor, Department of Government, London School of Economics, S.Wolton@lse.ac.uk.

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel theoretical framework to study the features of mass purges in authoritarian regimes. We contend that mass purges are an instrument of top-down accountability meant to motivate and screen a multitude of agents (e.g., single-party members, state bureaucrats). We show that the set of purged agents is well delineated in mild purges, whereas no performance indicator is a guarantee of safety in violent purges. The proportion of purged agents is non-monotonic in the intensity of violence. For the autocrat, increasing the intensity of violence always raises performance, but it improves the selection of subordinates only if violence is low to begin with. Hence, even absent de jure checks, the autocrat is de facto constrained by her subordinates’ strategic behavior. We use historical (including the Soviet purges and the Cultural Revolution) and recent (the Erdogan purge) events to illustrate our key theoretical findings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Scott Ashworth, Brett Benson, Dan Bernhardt, Alessandra Casella, Ali Cirone, Torun Dewan, Tiberiu Dragu, Scott Gehlbach, Thomas Groll, Haifeng Huang, Kenneth Janda, Navin Kartik, Roger Myerson, Salvatore Nunnari, Carlo Prato, Arturas Rozenas, Milan Svolik, Scott Tyson, four anonymous reviewers, the editor, and many conference and seminar participants for their helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are the authors’ responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, and Wolitzky, Alexander. 2011. “The Economics of Labor Coercion.” Econometrica 79 (2): 555–600.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Wolitzky, Alexander, Egorov, Georgy, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2008. “Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies.” The Review of Economic Studies 75 (4): 987–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno, and Friedenberg, Amanda. 2017. “Accountability and Information in Elections.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 9 (2): 95–138.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2004. “Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2–3): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Francis, and Rao, Vijayendra. 2002. “Terror as a Bargaining Instrument: A Case Study of Dowry Violence in Rural India.” The American Economic Review 92 (4): 1029–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew K. 1956. The Permanent Purge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2015. “Political Succession: A Model of Coups, Revolution, Purges and Everyday Politics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (4): 707–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Bruce B. 1993. “The SA after the Röhm Purge.” Journal of Contemporary History 28 (4): 659–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conquest, Robert. 2008. The Great Terror: A Reassessment. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
Coughlin, Con. 2005. Saddam: His Rise and Fall. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, Dal Bó, Pedro, and Di Tella, Rafael. 2006. “‘Plata O Plomo?’: Bribe and Punishment in a Theory of Political Influence.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallin, Alexander, and Breslauer, George W.. 1970. Political Terror in Communist Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dam, Nikolaos Van. 2011. The Struggle for Power in Syria: Politics and Society under Asad and the Ba’th Party. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Dewan, Torun, and Myatt, David P.. 2010. “The Declining Talent Pool of Government.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 267–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewan, Torun, and Hortala-Vallve, Rafael. 2011. “The Three as of Government Formation: Appointment, Allocation, and Assignment.” American Journal of Political Science. 55 (3): 610–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikötter, Frank. 2016. The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, 1962–1976. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Egorov, Georgy, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2011. “Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty–Competence Trade-Off.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (5): 903–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, Joan, Morelli, Massimo, and Rohner, Dominic. 2015. “Strategic Mass Killings.” Journal of Political Economy 123 (5): 1087–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 1979. “Stalin and the Making of a New Elite, 1928–1939.” Slavic Review 38 (3): 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2012. “Formal Models of Bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getty, John Arch. 1987. Origins of the Great Purges: The Soviet Communist Party Reconsidered, 1933–1938. Soviet and East European Studies Vol. 43. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Jerry R., and Stokey, Nancy L.. 1983. “A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy 91 (3): 349–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Paul R. 2009. Terror by Quota: State Security from Lenin to Stalin: (An Archival Study). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhne, Heinz. 1972. The Order of the Death’s Head: The Story of Hitler's SS. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
Holmström, Bengt. 1982. “Moral hazard in Teams.” The Bell Journal of Economics 13 (2): 324–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jiang, Junyan, Montagnes, B. Pablo, and Wolton, Stephane. 2017. “Political Tournaments: Accountability and Selection”. Unpublished manuscript. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2951224.Google Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Martimort, David. 2009. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, Dimitri, and Tyson, Scott A.. 2017. “Coercive Leadership.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 559–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, Edward P., and Rosen, Sherwin. 1981. “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 841–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewytzkyj, Boris. 1972. The Uses of Terror: The Soviet Secret Police 1917–1970. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
Morgan, Philip. 2012. “‘The Trash Who Are Obstacles in Our Way’: The Italian Fascist Party at the Point of Totalitarian Lift off, 1930–31.” English Historical Review 127 (525): 303–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. April 2017. “Inside Turkey’s Purge.” https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/13/magazine/inside-turkeys-purge.html.Google Scholar
Orlow, Dietrich. 1969. The History of the Nazi Party: 1933–1945. Vol. 2. [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rigby, Thomas Henry. 1968. Communist Party Membership in the USSR. Vol. 178. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 369–491.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Leonard Bertram. 1977. The Government and Politics of the Soviet Union. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. “Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teiwes, Frederick C. 1993. Politics and Purges in China: Rectification and the Decline of Party Norms, 1950–1965. London: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Teiwes, Frederick C. 2017. Leadership, Legitimacy, and Conflict in China: From a Charismatic Mao to the Politics of Succession. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkey Purge Website. 2017. https://turkeypurge.com/.Google Scholar
Tyson, Scott A. 2018. “The Agency Problem Underlying Repression.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolton, Thierry. 2015. Une histoire mondiale du communisme, tome 1: Les bourreaux. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Wolton, Thierry. 2017. Une histoire mondiale du communisme, tome 3: Les complices. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Zakharov, Alexei V. 2016. “The Loyalty-Competence Trade-Off in Dictatorships and Outside Options for Subordinates.” The Journal of Politics 78 (2): 457–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Montagnes and Wolton supplementary material

Montagnes and Wolton supplementary material 1

Download Montagnes and Wolton supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 547 KB
11
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mass Purges: Top-Down Accountability in Autocracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Mass Purges: Top-Down Accountability in Autocracy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Mass Purges: Top-Down Accountability in Autocracy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *