Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-j65dx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T13:53:07.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James G. March  and
Johan P. Olsen
James G. March
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Johan P. Olsen
Affiliation:
University of Bergen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary theories of politics tend to portray politics as a reflection of society, political phenomena as the aggregate consequences of individual behavior, action as the result of choices based on calculated self-interest, history as efficient in reaching unique and appropriate outcomes, and decision making and the allocation of resources as the central foci of political life. Some recent theoretical thought in political science, however, blends elements of these theoretical styles into an older concern with institutions. This new institutionalism emphasizes the relative autonomy of political institutions, possibilities for inefficiency in history, and the importance of symbolic action to an understanding of politics. Such ideas have a reasonable empirical basis, but they are not characterized by powerful theoretical forms. Some directions for theoretical research may, however, be identified in institutionalist conceptions of political order.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 734 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akerlof, G. A.The economics of social customs, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980, 95, 749–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, D. E.Political science and policy studies: towards a structural solution. Policy Studies Journal, 1977, 5, 570–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R.More effective choice in prisoners' dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1980, 24, 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D.The evolution of cooperation. Science, 1981, 211, 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M.The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 1962, 56, 947–952.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J.De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 1977, 67, 76–90.Google Scholar
Berger, S. (Ed.). Organizing interests in Europe: pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Berki, R. N.State and society: an antithesis of modern political thought. In Hayward, J. E. S. & Berki, R. N. (Eds.), State and society in contemporary Europe. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979.Google Scholar
Burns, J. M.Leadership. New York: Harperand Row, 1978.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. P.Two-dimensional man: an essay on the anthropology of power and symbolism in complex societies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R.Coping with complexity: The adaptive value of changing utility. American Economic Review, 1984, 74, 30–42.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P.A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, M.The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
Downs, A.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Easton, D.Political science. In Sills, D. L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Vol. 12. New York and London: Macmillan and Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, T., & Jacobsen, K. D.Rationality and responsibility in administrative and judicial decisionmaking. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1960.Google Scholar
Edelman, M.The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Egeberg, M.Stat og organisasjoner. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1981.Google Scholar
Enderud, H.The perception of power. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.Google Scholar
Etheredge, L. S.The case of the unreturned cafeteria trays. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 1976.Google Scholar
Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). Bringing the state back in. Report of a conference on research implications of current theories of the state. Unpublished manuscript, 1983.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G.Information as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26, 171–186.Google Scholar
Feller, W.An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. I. New York: Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar
Friedman, M.Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Geertz, C.Negara: the theater state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Hanf, K., & Scharpf, F. (Eds.). Interorganizational policy making: limits to coordination and central control. London: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
Hayward, J. E. S., & Berki, R. N. (Eds.). State and society in contemporary Europe. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979.Google Scholar
Heclo, H.Modern social policies in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Heller, H.Political science. In Seligman, E. R. A. & Johnson, A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, 1933 (1957).Google Scholar
Hirschleifer, J., & Riley, J. G.The analytics of uncertainty and information—an expository survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1979, 17, 1375–1421.Google Scholar
Jessop, B.Recent theories of the capitalist state. In Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1977, 1, 353–373.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D.Bureaucracies, minds, and the human engineering of decisions. In Ungson, G. R. & Braunstein, D. N. (Eds.), Decision making: an interdisciplinary inquiry. Boston: Kent, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). Between power and plenty: foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, F.Political institutionalization. London: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D.Defending the national interest: raw materials, investments and the U.S. foreign policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D.Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, in press.Google Scholar
Krieger, S.Mirror dance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kurz, M.Altruism as an outcome of social interaction. American Economic Review, 1978, 68, 216–222.Google Scholar
Laegreid, P., & Olsen, J. P.Byraakrati og beslutninger. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1978.Google Scholar
Lafferty, W. M.Participation and democracy in Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1981.Google Scholar
Lave, C. A., & March, J. G.An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: Harper and Row, 1975.Google Scholar
Levi, M.The predatory theory of rule. Politics and Society, 1981, 10, 431–465.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D., & March, J. G.A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, 2, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, N.The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 44, 251–261.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H.Games and decisions. New York: Wiley, 1957.Google Scholar
March, J. C., & March, J. G.Performance sampling in social matches. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 434–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G.Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 1978, 9, 587–608.Google Scholar
March, J. G.The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 1962, 24, 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G.Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In van de Ven, A. H. & Joyce, W. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational design and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1981.Google Scholar
March, J. G.Politics and the city. In Arrow, K., Coleman, J. S., Downs, A., & March, J. G. (Eds.), Urban processes as viewed by the social sciences. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1970.Google Scholar
March, J. G.The power of power. In Easton, D. (Ed.), Varieties of political theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P.Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P.Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Shapiro, Z.Behavioral decision theory and organizational decision theory. In Ungson, G. R. & Braunstein, D. N. (Eds.), Decision making: an interdisciplinary inquiry. Boston: Kent, 1982.Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Masters, R. D.The biological nature of the state. World Politics, 1983, 55, 161–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B.Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R., & Ross, L.Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A.Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1971.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E.On the autonomy of the democratic state. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P.Local budgeting: decision making or a ritual act? Scandinavian Political Studies, 1970, 5, 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. P.Organizational integration in government. In Nystrom, P. & Starbuck, W. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P.Organized democracy. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1983.Google ScholarPubMed
Olsen, J. P., & Saetren, H.Aksjoner og demokrati. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1980.Google Scholar
Olson, M.The logic of collective action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F.Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision making. American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 57, 75–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C.Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J.Management as symbolic action: The Creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In Cummings, L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Vol. 3. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1981(a).Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J.Some consequences of organizational demography: Potential impacts of an aging work force on formal organizations. In Kiesler, S. B., Morgan, J. N., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (Eds.), Aging: social change. New York: Academic Press, 1981(b).Google Scholar
Pondy, L. R.Leadership as a language game. In McCall, M. W. Jr. & Lombardo, M. M. (Eds.), Leadership. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Potter, A. L.Political institutions, political decay and the Argentine crises of 1930. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1979.Google Scholar
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B.Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Preston, L. D., & Keachie, E. C.Cost functions and progress functions: an integration. American Economic Review, 1964, 54, 100–108.Google Scholar
Robins, R. S.Political institutionalization and the integration of elites. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1976.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W.Does organization matter? Task structure and interaction in the ministerial bureaucracy. In Burack, E. H. & Negandhi, A. R. (Eds.), Organizational design: theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P., & Lehmbruch, G. (Eds.). Trends toward corporatist intermediation. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
Selznick, P.Leadership in administration. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F.Portfolio theory and capital markets. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K., & Weingast, B.Institutionalizing majority rule: A social choice theory with policy implications. American Economic Review, 1983, 73, 357–372.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.Administrative behavior. (2nd ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1957a.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.Models of man. New York: Wiley, 1957b.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T.Political response to capitalist crises: neoMarxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal. Politics and Society, 1980, 10(2), 155–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T.States and social revolutions: a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., & Finegold, K.State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal. Political Science Quarterly, 1982, 97, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, S.Building a new American state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Stephan, A. C.The state and society: Peru in comparative perspective. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J.The theory of price (Rev. ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1952.Google Scholar
Therborn, G.What does the ruling class do when it rules? London: Verso, 1980.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (Ed.). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1978.Google Scholar
Trimberger, E. K.Revolution from above: Military bureaucrats and development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971, 46, 35–57.Google Scholar
Waterstone, G. C.Order and counterorder. Dualism in western culture. New York: Philosophical Library, 1966.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E.Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wolin, S.Politics and vision. Boston: Little, Brown, 1960.Google Scholar
Wright, H. T.Recent research on the origin of the state. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1977, 6, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.