Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-mhx7p Total loading time: 0.352 Render date: 2022-05-22T14:57:55.723Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Nondomination or Practices of Freedom? French Muslim Women, Foucault, and The Full Veil Ban

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2016

INÉS VALDEZ*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
*
Inés Valdez is Assistant Professor, Ohio State University, 154 N Oval Mall, 2140 Derby Hall, Columbus, OH 43210 (inevaldez@ gmail.com).

Abstract

This article proposes a conception of freedom understood as practices. Based on Michel Foucault's work on the ethics of the self, I develop a conception of freedom that exceeds liberation and distinguishes between genuine practices of freedom and practices of the self that are unreflective responses to systems of government. I develop and illustrate this conception through an engagement with the recent French ban on full veils in public spaces and the ethnographic literature on European Muslim revival movements. I reconstruct how Muslim women relate to alternative discourses through specific practices of the self. These practices reveal that French Muslim women actively contest discourses of secularism and liberation that construct them as inherently passive and in need of tutelage. The conception I develop sheds light on some shortcomings of Philip Pettit's notion of freedom as nondomination. I argue that the proposed account is useful to, first, criticize the centrality of the opposition between arbitrary and nonarbitrary power in the definition of freedom. Second, I show that the predominant engagement with the external dimension of freedom in Pettit makes it difficult to capture the particular subjective practices that make up freedom and its development in the presence of power and/or attempts at domination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearne, Jeremy. 2014. “ Laïcité: A Parallel French Cultural Policy.” French Cultural Studies 25 (3/4): 320–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir-Moazami, Schirin. 2011. “Dialogue as a Governmental Technique: Managing Gendered Islam in Germany.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assemblée Nationale. 2010a. “Projet de Loi: interdissant la Dissimulation du Visage dans l’espace Public,” ed. Assemblée Nationale. Paris: Assemblé Nationale.Google Scholar
Assemblée Nationale. 2010b. “Rapport d’information,” ed. Assemblée Nationale.Google Scholar
Assemblée Nationale. 2010c. “Résolution sur l’Attachment au Respect des Valeurs Républicaines Face au Développement de Pratiques Radicales qui y Portent Atteinte.” In Texte Adopté Nro. 456 “Petite Loi,” ed. Assemblée Nationale.Google Scholar
Barras, Amélie. 2009. “A Rights-based Discourse to Contest the Boundaries of State Secularism? The Case of the Headscarf Bans in France and Turkey.” Democratization 16 (6): 1237–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauberot, Jean. 1998. “La Laïcité Française et ses Mutations.” Social Compass 45 (1): 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News Europe. 2011. “Belgian Ban on Full Veils Comes into Force.” BBC News Europe, July 23.Google Scholar
Bérengère, Poletti and Assemblée Nationale. 2010b. “Rapport d'information.” Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
Bérengère, Poletti and Assemblée Nationale. 2010c. “Texte Adopté Nro. 456 «Petite Loi» Résolution sur l'attachment au respect des valeurs républicaines face au développement de pratiques radicales qui y portent atteinte.” Paris: Assemblé Nationale.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2010. “The Return of Political Theology. The Scarf Affair in Comparative Constitutional Perspective in France, Germany and Turkey.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 38 (3–4): 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press, 118–72.Google Scholar
Bouteldja, Naima. 2011. Unveiling the Truth: Why 32 Muslim Women Wear the Full-face Veil in France. New York: Open Society Foundations.Google Scholar
Bowen, John. 2008. Why the French Don't Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burchell, Graham. 1996. “Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self.” In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism, and Rationalities of Government, eds. Barry, A., Osborne, T., and Rose, N.. London: Taylor and Francis, 1936.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 2013. The Ethics of Immigration: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chrisafis, Angelique. 2008. “France Rejects Muslim woman over Radical Practice of Islam.” The Guardian.Google Scholar
Chrisafis, Angelique. 2011. “France's Burqa Ban: Women are ‘Effectively under House Arrest’.” The Guardian, September 19.Google Scholar
Commission de Reflexion Sur L’Application du Principe de Laïcité dans la République. 2003. “Rapport au President de la Republique.” Paris.Google Scholar
Conseil d’Ètat. 2008. “N° 286798.” Paris: Conseil d’Etat.Google Scholar
Darcos, Xavier. 2003. “Table Ronde « École et laïcité aujourd'hui ».” In Projet de loi relatif à l'application du principe de laïcité dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics. Paris: Assemblée Nationale. http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/12/dossiers/laicite.asp#table_ronde Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. 2006. “Antisexisme ou Antiracisme? Un faux dilemmeNouvelles Questions Féministes 25 (1): 5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deltombe, Thomas. 2007. L’islam imaginaire. La construction Médiatique de L’islamophobie en France 1975–2005. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Deveaux, Monique. 2006. Gender And Justice In Multicultural Liberal States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilts, Andrew. 2011. “From ‘Entrepreneur of the Self’ to ‘Care of the Self’: Neo-liberal Governmentality and Foucault's Ethics.” Foucault Studies (12): 130–46.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Steven. 2010. “France: Full-Face Veil Ban Approved.” The New York Times, October 10, A8.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Steven. 2012. “In a Ban, a Measure of European Tolerance.” The New York Times, September 1.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, Nancy. 2011. “Governmentality as Epistemology.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (3): 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettlinger, Nancy. 2016. “Precarity at the Nexus of Governmentality and Sovereignty: Entangled Fields of Power and Political Subjectivity.” In Precarity and the International, ed. Vij, R.. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Fadil, Nadia. 2011. “Not-/Unveiling as an Ethical PracticeFeminist Review 98 (1): 83109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, Mayanthi L. 2010. “Reconfiguring Freedom: Muslim Piety and the Limits of Secular Law and Public Discourse in France.” American Ethnologist 37 (1): 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, Mayanthi L. 2014. The Republic Unsettled. Muslim French and the Contradictions of the Republic. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. “What is Enlightenment?” In The Foucault Reader, ed. , P. Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, 3250.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. “Qu’est-ce Que la Critique? [Critique et Aufklärung].Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie 84 (2): 3563.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994. “Est-il Donc Important de Penser?” In Dits et Écrits, Tome 4 (1980–1988), eds. Defert, D. and Ewald, F.. Paris: Gallimard, 178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997a. “The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: The New Press, 281302.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997b. “The Hermeneutics of the Subject.” In Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: The New Press, 93106.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997c. “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress.” In Ethics, Subjectivity, and Truth, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: The New Press, 253–80.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2008. “Pettit's Civic Republicanism and Male Domination.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, eds. Laborde, C. and Maynor, J.. Oxford: Blackwell, 246–68.Google Scholar
Ganley, Elaine. 2011. “Kenza Drider, French Presidential Candidate, Targets Ban of Veil.” The Huffington Post, September 22.Google Scholar
Gaspard, Françoise, and Khosrokhavar, Farhad. 1995. Le Foulard et la République. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, Amélie. 2010. “‘Je Porte le Niqab et Alors?’.” TF1 News, January 25.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Christine M. 2011. “Troublesome Threesome: Feminism, Anthropology and Muslim Women's Piety.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 2009. Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge, U.K. and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jouili, Jeanette S. 2011. “Beyond Emancipation: Subjectivities and Ethics among Women in Europe's Islamic Revival Communities.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 4764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korteweg, Anna, and Yurdakul, Gökce. 2014. Headscarf Debates: Conflicts of National Belonging. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. 2006. “Female Autonomy, Education, and the Hijab .” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (3): 251377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. 2008. Critical Republicanism: the Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2011. “From Immigrants to Muslims: Shifting Categories of the French Model of Integration.” In Identity Politics in the Public Realm: Bringing Institutions Back In, eds. Eisenberg, A. and Kymlicka, W.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 190214.Google Scholar
Lépinard, Eléonore. 2015. “Migrating Concepts: Immigrant Integration and the Regulation of Religious Dress in France and Canada.” Ethnicities 15 (5):611–32.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. “Introduction: Autonomy Reconfigured.” In Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, eds. Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclure, Jocelyn, and Taylor, Charles. 2011. Secularism and Freedom of Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2012. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba, and Danchin, Peter G.. 2014. “Immunity or Regulation? Antinomies of Religious Freedom.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (1): 129–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2008. “The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.” Political Theory 36 (1): 936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavelli, Luca. 2013. “Between Normalisation and Exception: The Securitisation of Islam and the Construction of the Secular Subject.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (2): 159– 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 2005. “The Indeterminacy of Republican Policy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (1): 6793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. 2012. “Government Approves Ban of Clothing that Covers the Face.” Amsterdam: Government of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the People's Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Melvin L. 2008. “Republican Confusion and Liberal Clarification.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 34 (7): 799824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkozy, Nicolas. 2009. “Déclaration devant le Parlement réuni en Congrès” Élsyéé - Présidence de la Republique – Discours, June 22.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Selby, Jennifer A. 2011. “Islam in France Reconfigured: Republican Islam in the 2010 Gerin Report.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 31 (3): 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidney, Algernon. 1990. “Discourses Concerning Govenment.” ed. West, T. G.. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1997. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979. “What's Wrong with Negative Liberty?” In The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin, ed. , A. Ryan. New York: Oxford University Press, 173–94.Google Scholar
Tevanian, Pierre. 2007. La République du Mépris. Les Métamorphoses du Racisme dans la France des Années Sarkozy. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Tevanian, Pierre. 2012. Dévoilements. Du Hijab a la Burqa: Les Dessous d’une Obsession Française. Paris: Éditions Libertalia.Google Scholar
Tissot, Sylvie. 2011. “Excluding Muslim Women: From Hijab to Niqab, from School to Public Space.” Public Culture 23 (1): 3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2012. “Competing for Liberty: The Republican Critique of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 603–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vintges, Karen. 2012. “Muslim Women in the Western Media: Foucault, Agency, Governmentality and Ethics.” European Journal of Women's Studies 19 (3): 283–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnubst, Shannon. 2012. “The Queer Thing about Neoliberal Pleasure: A Foucaultian Reading.” Foucault Studies 14: 7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1982. “A Vindication of the Rights of Women.” ed. Hardt, U. H.. New York: Whitston.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. 1991. “English Republicanism.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, eds. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, M.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 443–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerouala, Faïza. 2014. “Karima T. Porte un Voile intégral et refuse de ‘Passer pour une arriérée’.” Le Monde, July 2.Google Scholar
9
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Nondomination or Practices of Freedom? French Muslim Women, Foucault, and The Full Veil Ban
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Nondomination or Practices of Freedom? French Muslim Women, Foucault, and The Full Veil Ban
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Nondomination or Practices of Freedom? French Muslim Women, Foucault, and The Full Veil Ban
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *