Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Bullock, John G.
and
Ha, Shang E.
2011.
Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science.
p.
508.
Yanagizawa-Drott, David
and
Madestam, Andreas
2011.
Shaping the Nation: The Effect of Fourth of July on Political Preferences and Behavior in the United States.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Rogers, Todd
and
Aida, Masa
2011.
Why Bother Asking? The Limited Value of Self-Reported Vote Intention.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Wojcieszak, Magdalena
and
Rojas, Hernando
2011.
Correlates of Party, Ideology and Issue Based Extremity in an era of Egocentric Publics.
The International Journal of Press/Politics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
488.
Hayes, Thomas J.
2011.
American Attitudes Toward Economic Inequality.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Gerber, Alan S.
Huber, Gregory A.
Doherty, David
and
Dowling, Conor M.
2012.
Personality and the Strength and Direction of Partisan Identification.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
653.
ESAIASSON, PETER
GILLJAM, MIKAEL
and
PERSSON, MIKAEL
2012.
Which decision‐making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 6,
p.
785.
Coffey, Daniel J.
and
Joseph, Patricia Hallam
2013.
A Polarized Environment.
American Behavioral Scientist,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
116.
Jerit, J.
Barabas, J.
and
Clifford, S.
2013.
Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects.
Public Opinion Quarterly,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 1,
p.
256.
Ayob, Noor Hadzlida
and
Sakdan, Mohd Fo’ad
2013.
Political Beliefs: Determinant Well-Being of the Flood Victims.
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity,
p.
548.
Persson, Mikael
Esaiasson, Peter
and
Gilljam, Mikael
2013.
The effects of direct voting and deliberation on legitimacy beliefs: an experimental study of small group decision-making.
European Political Science Review,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
381.
Martel García, Fernando
2013.
Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Martel García, Fernando
2013.
When and Why is Attrition a Problem in Randomized Controlled Experiments and How to Diagnose it.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Bailey, Michael
Hopkins, Daniel J.
and
Rogers, Todd
2013.
Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintended Consequences of Voter Persuasion Efforts.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Arceneaux, Kevin
and
Vander Wielen, Ryan J.
2013.
The Effects of Need for Cognition and Need for Affect on Partisan Evaluations.
Political Psychology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Martel García, Fernando
2013.
Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Madestam, Andreas
Shoag, Daniel
Veuger, Stan
and
Yanagizawa-Drott, David
2013.
Do Political Protests Matter? Evidence from the Tea Party Movement*.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Vol. 128,
Issue. 4,
p.
1633.
Brooks, Clem
and
Manza, Jeff
2013.
A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession.
American Sociological Review,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 5,
p.
727.
Wurgler, Emily
and
Brooks, Clem
2014.
Out of Step? Voters and Social Issues in U.S. Presidential Elections.
The Sociological Quarterly,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 4,
p.
683.
Lopez de Leon, Fernanda Leite
and
Rizzi, Renata
2014.
A Test for the Rational Ignorance Hypothesis: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Brazil.
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
p.
380.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.