Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-q9r9l Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2022-07-03T17:49:54.640Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

DANIEL J. HOPKINS
DANIEL J. HOPKINS*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
Daniel J. Hopkins is Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Georgetown University, ICC 674, 37th and O Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20057 (dh335@georgetown.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In ethnic and racial terms, America is growing rapidly more diverse. Yet attempts to extend racial threat hypotheses to today's immigrants have generated inconsistent results. This article develops the politicized places hypothesis, an alternative that focuses on how national and local conditions interact to construe immigrants as threatening. Hostile political reactions to neighboring immigrants are most likely when communities undergo sudden influxes of immigrants and when salient national rhetoric reinforces the threat. Data from several sources, including twelve geocoded surveys from 1992 to 2009, provide consistent support for this approach. Time-series cross-sectional and panel data allow the analysis to exploit exogenous shifts in salient national issues such as the September 11 attacks, reducing the problem of residential self-selection and other threats to validity. The article also tests the hypothesis using new data on local anti-immigrant policies. By highlighting the interaction of local and national conditions, the politicized places hypothesis can explain both individual attitudes and local political outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 40 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher. 2005. “Let's Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Probits Where They Belong.” Conflict Management and Peace Research 22: 327–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aizenman, N. C. 2007. “Small-Town Resistance Helped to Seal Defeat.” Washington Post 29 June.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barkan, Eliot. 2003. “Return of the Nativists? California Public Opinion and Immigration in the 1980s and 1990s.” Social Science History 27 (2): 229–83.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, Welch, Susan, Sigelman, Lee. 1995. “Residential Context and Racial Solidarity among African Americans.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 434–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas, Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “Is It Immigration or the Immigrants? The Emotional Influence of Groups on Public Opinion and Political Action.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 959–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, Regina P., Jones, Bradford S.. 2005. “Re-examining Racial Attitudes: The Conditional Relationship Between Diversity and Socioeconomic Environment.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 359–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Citrin, Jack, Wong, Cara. 2000. Ethnic Context, Race Relations, and California Politics. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L., Wong, Cara, Citrin, Jack. 2006. “‘Racial Threat,’ Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives.” Political Behavior 28: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, David, Dustmann, Christian, Preston, Ian. 2005. “Understanding Attitudes to Immigration: The Migration and Minority Module of the First European Social Survey.” Center for Research and Analysis of Migration Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
Chiricos, Ted, Hogan, Michael, Gertz, Marc. 1997. “Racial Composition of the Neighborhood and Fear of Crime.” Criminology 35: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, Druckman, James N.. 2007. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation.” Journal of Communication 57: 99–118.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher, Wong, Cara. 1997. “Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics 59 (3): 858–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Reingold, Beth, Green, Donald P.. 1990. “American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change.” Journal of Politics 52 (4): 1124–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela. 2007. “Immigration and Conflict.” Ph.D. diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Dehejia, Rajeev H., Wahba, Sadek. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Re-Evaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (448, December): 1053–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deufel, Benjamin J. 2006. “Trial Membership: Responses to Immigrants in American Communities.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Diamond, Alexis, Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2008. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method of Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” June 12. http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/papers/GenMatch.pdf (December 6, 2009).Google Scholar
Dixon, Jeffrey C., Rosenbaum, Michael S.. 2004. “Nice to Know You? Testing Contact, Cultural, and Group Threat Theories of Anti-Black and Anti-Hispanic Stereotypes.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (2): 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, Christian, Preston, Ian. 2000. “Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration.” Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper Series.Google Scholar
Dustmann, Christian, Preston, Ian. 2001. “Attitudes to Ethnic Minorities, Ethnic Context and Location Decisions.” Economic Journal 111 (April): 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM). 2007. “Listing of Local Anti-Immigrant Policies.” www.fairimmigration.org (March 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Fischel, William A. 2001. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-use Policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Mary J. 2003. “The Relative Importance of Income and Race in Determining Residential Outcomes in US Urban Areas, 1970–2000.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (5): 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Veronica. 1993. “Latinos Address Crime, Health.” Chicago Sun-Times 3 October.Google Scholar
Fox, Cybelle. 2004. “The Color of Welfare? How Whites' Attitudes Towards Latinos Influence Support for Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (3): 580–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Gary P. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review XXIX (4): 881–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, William H. 2006. Diversity Spreads Out: Metropolitan Shifts in Hispanic, Asian, and Black Populations Since 2000. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2006. “Seeing Difference: The Effect of Economic Disparity on Black Attitudes Toward Latinos.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 982–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-poverty Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaberson, William. 1994. “8 of 10 Largest U.S. Papers Have Declines in Circulation.” New York Times 30 April.Google Scholar
Glaser, James M. 1994. “Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in the South.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Ingrid Ellen. 2000. Sharing America's Neighborhoods: The Prospects for Stable Racial Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Strolovitch, Dara Z., Wong, Janelle S.. 1998. “Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 372–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Hiscox, Michael J.. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization 61 (2): 399–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Gordon H., Scheve, Kenneth, Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2007. “Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies.” Economics and Politics 19 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2008. “Media Frames and the Immigration Debate.” Presented to the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hellerstein, Judith, Neumark, David. 2005. “Workplace Segregation in the United States: Race, Ethnicity, and Skill.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.Google Scholar
Higham, John. 1992. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel E., King, Gary, Imai, Kosuke, Stuart, Elizabeth. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Improving Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 10 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Hood, M.V., Morris, Irwin L.. 1997. “Amigo o Enemigo? Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78 (2): 309–23.Google Scholar
Hood, M.V., Morris, Irwin L.. 1998. “Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor. . .But Make Sure They Have a Green Card: The Effects of Documented and Undocumented Migrant Context on Anglo Opinion Toward Immigration.” Political Behavior 20 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2009. “The Diversity Discount: When Increasing Ethnic and Racial Diversity Prevents Tax Increases.” Journal of Politics 71 (01): 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, John. 1995. The Politics of Diversity: Immigration, Resistance, and Change in Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellstedt, Paul M. 2003. The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Communication and Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 167–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 49–69.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Zeng, Langche. 2002. “Estimating Risk and Rate Levels, Ratios and Differences in Case-Control Studies.” Statistics in Medicine 21: 1409–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruse, Kevin M. 2005. White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Luke J. 2004. “The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 2003.” U.S. Census Bureau P20-551.Google Scholar
Lassiter, Matthew D. 2006. The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lelyveld, Joseph. 2006. “The Border Dividing Arizona.” New York Times October 15: 40–47.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul G., Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick. 2007. “Police Practices in Immigrant-Destination Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 42 (6): 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Ivan H. 2006. Deflecting Immigration: Networks, Markets, and Regulation in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., Alarcon, Rafaela, Dura, Jorge, Gonzalez, Humberto. 1987. Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mayda, Anna Maria. 2006. “Who Is against Immigrants? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (3): 510–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Eileen Diaz. 2008. “The Destinations of Contemporary Mexican Immigrants.” International Migration Review 42 (4): 767–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1992. “Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1994. “Contextualizing Personal Experience: The Role of Mass Media.” Journal of Politics 56 (3): 689–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric, Mendelberg, Tali. 2000. “Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 574–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric, Wong, Janelle. 2003. “Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olzak, Susan. 1992. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2006. “What's to Fear from Immigrants? Creating an Assimilationist Threat Scale.” Political Psychology 27 (4): 549–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. 1998. “Intergroup Contact Theory.” Annual Review of Psychology 49: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2007. “The State of the News Media 2007.” www.stateofthemedia.org/2007/ (Accessed December 16, 2009).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, Karthick, and Wong, Tom (Tak). 2010. “Partisanship, Not Spanish: Explaining Municipal Ordinances Affecting Undocumented Immigrants.” In State and Local Immigration Policy Activism in the U.S.: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Varsanyi, Monica. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rieder, Jonathan. 1985. Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn against Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rupasingha, Anil, Goetz, Stephan J., Freshwater, David. 2005. “The Production of Social Capital in U.S. Counties.” Journal of Socio-Economics 35 (1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, Robert. 1991. “Estimation in Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects.” Biometrika 78: 719–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, Slaughter, Matthew. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1, February): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah. 2005. Press One for English: Language Policy, Public Opinion, and American Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah. 2009. “Amnesty, Guest Workers, Fences! Oh My! Public Opinion about ‘Comprehensive Immigration Reform.’” Presented at the Dynamics of Public Opinion on Immigration in the U.S. and the West Conference, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2001. “Official-English and the States: Influences on Declaring English the Official Language in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1976. The Concept of the Political. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. 1993. “Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory.” In Explorations in Political Psychology, eds. Iyengar, ShantoMcGuire, William J.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 70–112.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Savalei, Victoria. 2006. “The Political Color Line in America: Many ‘Peoples of Color’ or Black Exceptionalism?” Political Psychology 27 (6): 895–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, Robert O. 2003. American Babylon: Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Citrin, Jack. 2007. “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests, and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Hagendoorn, Louk, Prior, Markus. 2004. “Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, Tom, Bosker, Roel. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M., Post, Stephanie Shirley, Rinden, Allison. 2000. “Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (2): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugrue, Thomas J. 1996. The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Marylee C. 1998. “How White Attitudes Vary with the Racial Composition of Local Populations: Numbers Count.” American Sociological Review 63: 512–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tolbert, Caroline J., Grummel, John A.. 2003. “Revisiting the Racial Threat Hypothesis: White Voter Support for California's Proposition 209.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (2): 183–92.Google Scholar
Voss, Stephen D. 1996. “Beyond Racial Threat: Failure of an Old Hypothesis in the New South.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Cara, Drake, Katherine W.. 2006. “Multiracial Identities in Multiracial Contexts: The Conditional Political Effects of Race, Identity, and Environment.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Wong, Cara J. 2007. ““Little” and “Big” Pictures in Our Heads: Race, Local Context, and Innumeracy about Racial Groups in the United States.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (3): 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2003. “Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics.” American Economic Review 93 (2): 133–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
594
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *