Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2018


LAUREN E. YOUNG
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Many authoritarian regimes use frightening acts of repression to suppress dissent. Theory from psychology suggests that emotions should affect how citizens perceive and process information about repression risk and ultimately whether or not they dissent. I test the effects of emotions on dissent in autocracy by running a lab-in-the-field experiment with 671 opposition supporters in Zimbabwe that randomly assigns some participants to an exercise that induces a mild state of fear, whereas others complete a neutral placebo. The fear treatment significantly reduces hypothetical and behavioral measures of dissent by substantively large amounts. It also increases pessimism about parameters that enter into the dissent decision as well as risk aversion. These results show that emotions interact in important ways with strategic considerations. Fear may be a powerful component of how unpopular autocrats exclude large portions of their populations from mobilizing for regime change.


Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

My thanks to the data collection team at Voice for Democracy. Thanks to Abhit Bhandari, Graeme Blair, Christopher Blattman, Alexander Coppock, Macartan Humphreys, Albert Fang, Grant Gordon, Donald Green, Kimuli Kasara, Dacher Keltner, Adrienne LeBas, Andrew Little, Isabela Mares, John Marshall, Eldred Masunungure, Gwyneth McClendon, Tamar Mitts, Suresh Naidu, Gabriella Sacramone-Lutz, Camille Strauss-Kahn, Thomas Zeitzoff, and seminar participants at CAPERS, WGAPE, NEWEPS, the Yale Institute for Social and Political Studies, APSA, and the Columbia Comparative Politics Seminar for feedback at various stages. Thanks to the US Institute for Peace; the International Peace Research Association Foundation; the Earth Institute Advanced Consortium on Cooperation, Conflict, and Complexity; the Columbia University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences; the Columbia University Department of Political Science; and the National Science Foundation for support for this research. This experiment was pre-registered with EGAP and can be accessed at http://egap.org/registration/1353. This research was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board under protocol IRB-AAAP2200. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OOMI57.


References

Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2016. “Did that Scare You? Tips on Creating Emotion in Experimental Subjects.” Political Analysis 24 (4): 485–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldama, Abraham, Vasquez, Mateo, and Young, Lauren E.. 2018. “Fear and Citizen Coordination Against Dictatorship.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1–23. Published online 8 November 2018.Google Scholar
Angeletos, George-Marios, Hellwig, Christian, and Pavan, Alessandro. 2007. “Dynamic Global Games of Regime Change: Learning, Multiplicity, and the Timing of Attacks.” Econometrica 75 (3): 711–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
Banks, Antoine J., and Valentino, Nicholas. A.. 2012. “Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 286–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogliacino, Francesco, Grimalda, Gianluca, Ortoleva, Pietro, and Ring, Patrick. 2017. “Exposure to and Recall of Violence Reduce Short-Term Memory and Cognitive Control.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (32): 8505–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booysen, Susan. 2012. Change and ‘New’ Politics in Zimbabwe: Interim Report of a Nationwide Survey of Public Opinion in Zimbabwe: June–July 2012. Technical Report, Freedom House.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael. 2011. “Violence, Partisanship and Transitional justice in Zimbabwe.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 49 (3): 353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, Dulani, Boniface, and Masunungure, Eldred. 2016. “Detecting Manipulation in Authoritarian Elections: Survey-Based Methods in Zimbabwe.” Electoral Studies 42: 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Masunungure, Eldred. 2008. “Zimbabwe’s Long Agony.” Journal of Democracy 19 (4): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Masunungure, Eldred. 2012. “Voting Intentions in Zimbabwe: A Margin of Terror?” Afrobarometer Briefing Paper 103.Google Scholar
Callen, Michael, Isaqzadeh, Mohammad, Long, James D., and Sprenger, Charles. 2014. “Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan.” The American Economic Review 104 (1): 123–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Sabine C. 2006. “The Dynamic Relationship Between Protest and Repression.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Brett L., and Carter, Erin Baggott. 2016. “Propaganda and Protest: Evidence from Post-Cold War Africa.” Working Paper, USC.Google Scholar
Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Zimbabwe (CCJPZ). 1997. Report on the 1980s Disturbances in Matabeleland and the Midlands.Google Scholar
Cohn, Alain, Engelmann, Jan, Fehr, Ernst, and Maréchal, Michel André. 2015. “Evidence for Countercyclical Risk Aversion: An experiment with Financial Professionals.” The American Economic Review 105 (2): 860–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and McDermott, Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.” Political Behavior 30 (3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, Catherine C., and Grossman, Philip J.. 2002. “Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk.” Evolution and Human Behavior 23 (4): 281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorov, Georgy, Guriev, Sergei, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. “Why Resource-Poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data.” American Political Science Review 103 (4): 645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, Michael W. 1982. Attention and Arousal. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, Michael W., and Calvo, Manuel G.. 1992. “Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory.” Cognition and Emotion 6 (6): 409–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Francisco, Ronald A. 1995. “The Relationship Between Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Evaluation in Three Coercive States.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (2): 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2015. Freedom in the World. Technical Report, Freedom House.Google Scholar
Frijda, Nico H. 1986. The Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garcia-Ponce, Omar, and Pasquale, Ben. 2015. “How Political Violence Shapes Trust in the State.” Working Paper, UC Davis. http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GarciaPonce_and_Pasquale_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Gehlbach, Scott, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2014. “Government Control of the media.” Journal of Public Economics 118: 163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, Scott, Sonin, Konstantin, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2016. “Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 565–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, Jasper, James M., and Polletta, Francesca. 2009. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Jeffrey. 1987. The Psychology of Fear and Stress, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paola, and Zingales, Luigi. 2013. “Time Varying Risk Aversion.” NBER Working Paper (19284).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
HRW. 2008. “Bullets for Each of You” State-Sponsored Violence since Zimbabwe’s March 29 Elections. Technical Report, Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2013. “Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments.” Political Analysis 21 (2): 141–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric J., and Tversky, Amos. 1983. “Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1): 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassam, Karim S., and Mendes, Wendy Berry. 2013. “The Effects of Measuring Emotion: Physiological Reactions to Emotional Situations Depend on Whether Someone Is Asking.” PLOS ONE 8 (6): e64959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, Dacher, Locke, Kenneth, and Audrain, Paul C.. 1993. “The Influence of Attributions on the Relevance of Negative Feelings to Personal Satisfction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (1): 21–9.Google Scholar
Khawaja, Marwan. 1993. “Repression and Popular Collective Action: Evidence from the West Bank.” Sociological Forum 8 (1): 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, Jeffrey R., Liebman, Jeffrey B., and Katz, Lawrence F.. 2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.” Econometrica 75 (1): 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebing, Sylvie. 2010. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review.” Biological Psychology 84: 394–421.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2006. “Polarization as Craft: Party Formation and State Violence in Zimbabwe.” Comparative Politics 38 (4): 419–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (1): 146–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, Jennifer S., Gonzalez, Roxana M., Small, Deborah A., and Fischhoff, Baruch. 2003. “Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism: A National Field experiment.” Psychological Science 14 (2): 144–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, Andrew T. 2017. “Propaganda and Credulity.” Games and Economic Behavior 102: 224–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics 47 (1): 42–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Menning, Jesse O.. 2009. “When Can Politicians Scare Citizens into Supporting Bad Policies?American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George E.. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 672–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Will H. 1998. “Repression and Dissent: Substitution, Context, and Timing.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 851–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, C. Daniel, and Tingley, Dustin. 2016. “The Influence of Emotion on Trust.” Political Analysis 24 (4): 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSISA. 2007. “We Have Degrees in Violence”: A Report on Torture and Human Rights Abuses in Zimbabwe. Technical Report, Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa and Open Society Institute and Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture.Google Scholar
Park, Jiahyun, and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. 2000. “Mood and Heuristics: The Influence of Happy and Sad States on Sensitivity and Bias in Stereotyping.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (6): 1005–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearlman, Wendy. 2013. “Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (2): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasler, Karen. 1996. “Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution.” American Sociological Review 61 (1): 132–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbaum, Barbara Olasov, and Schwartz, Ann C.. 2002. “Exposure Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.” American Journal of Psychotherapy 56 (1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozenas, Arturas, and Stukal, Denis. 2017. “How Autocrats Manipulate Economic News: Evidence from Russia’s State-Controlled Television.” Working Paper, New York University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachikonye, Lloyd. 2011. When a State Turns on its Citizens: 60 Years of Institutionalized Violence in Zimbabwe. Harare: Weaver Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shadmehr, Mehdi, and Bernhardt, Dan.. 2011. “Collective Action with Uncertain Payoffs: Coordination, Public Signals, and Punishment Dilemmas.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 829–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadmehr, Mehdi, and Bernhardt, Dan. 2015. “State Censorship.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 7 (2): 280–307.Google Scholar
Steinman, Shari, Wootton, Bethany, and Tolin, David F.. 2016. “Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders.” In Encyclopedia of Mental Health. Vol. 2, ed. Friedman, Howard. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E., and Hassid, Jonathan. 2012. “Amplifying Silence Uncertainty and Control Parables in Contemporary China.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (10): 1230–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E., and O’Brien, Kevin J.. 2012. “Politics at the Boundary Mixed Signals and the Chinese State.” Modern China 38 (2): 174–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, Fritz, Schwarz, Norbert, and Gschneidinger, Elisabeth. 1985. “Happiness and Reminiscing: The Role of Time Perspective, Affect, and Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (6): 1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing-Miles, Tendi. 2013. “Robert Mugabe’s 2013 Presidential Election Campaign.” Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (4): 963–70.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, Groenendyk, Eric W., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Hutchings, Vincent L.. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne K.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1998. “Acting ‘As if’: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40 (3): 503–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lauren E. 2016. “Preying on the Poor: The Impact of Repressive Violence on Citizen Behavior.” Working Paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Young, Lauren E. 2017. “Psychological Characteristics and Variation in Reactions to Repressive Violence.” Presented at APSA 2017.Google Scholar
Zamchiya, Phillan. 2013. “The MDC-T’s (Un) Seeing Eye in Zimbabwe’s 2013 Harmonised Elections: A Technical Knockout.” Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (4): 955–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbabwe Peace Project. 2015. Monthly Monitoring Report. Technical Report, Septmeber 2015. https://www.zimpeaceproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Sept-2015-MMR.pdf.Google Scholar
Link

Young supplementary material

Young supplementary material 1

[Opens in a new window]
PDF 375 KB

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 168
Total number of PDF views: 1834 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th November 2018 - 2nd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-t2s8l Total loading time: 4.824 Render date: 2020-12-02T23:38:05.646Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Wed Dec 02 2020 23:05:44 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *