Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-frvt8 Total loading time: 1.148 Render date: 2022-10-05T00:27:03.442Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2013

MARK R. BEISSINGER*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Mark R. Beissinger is Henry W. Putnam Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 237 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ08544-1013 (mbeissin@princeton.edu)

Abstract

Using two unusual surveys, this study analyzes participation in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, comparing participants with revolution supporters, opponents, counter-revolutionaries, and the apathetic/inactive. As the analysis shows, most revolutionaries were weakly committed to the revolution's democratic master narrative, and the revolution's spectacular mobilizational success was largely due to its mobilization of cultural cleavages and symbolic capital to construct a negative coalition across diverse policy groupings. A contrast is drawn between urban civic revolutions like the Orange Revolution and protracted peasant revolutions. The strategies associated with these revolutionary models affect the roles of revolutionary organization and selective incentives and the character of revolutionary coalitions. As the comparison suggests, postrevolutionary instability may be built into urban civic revolutions due to their reliance on a rapidly convened negative coalition of hundreds of thousands, distinguished by fractured elites, lack of consensus over fundamental policy issues, and weak commitment to democratic ends.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Rick, and Currim, Imran. 2003. “Retention of Latent Segments in Regression-Based Marketing Models.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 20 (4): 315–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arel, Dominique. 2002. “Interpreting ‘Nationality’ and ‘Language’ in the 2001 Ukrainian Census.” Post-Soviet Affairs 18 (3): 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arel, Dominique. 2007. “Why and How It Happened: Orange Ukraine Chooses the West, but Without the East.” In Aspects of the Orange Revolution III: The Context and Dynamics of the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Election, eds. Bredies, Ingmar, Umland, Andreas, and Yakushik, Valentin. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem-Verlag: 3553.Google Scholar
Aslund, Anders. 2005. “The Economic Policy of Ukraine After the Orange Revolution.”Eurasian Geography and Economics 46 (5): 327–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics (June): 259–76.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark, Jamal, Amaney, and Mazur, Kevin. 2012. “Who Participates in ‘Democratic’ Revolutions? A Comparison of the Egyptian and Tunisian Revolutions.” Paper prepared for the annual convention of the American Political Science Association. August 29–September 2, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2008. “Economic Roots of Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World.” World Politics 60 (April): 390437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J., and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1984. “Why Revolutions Succeed and Fail.”Polity 16 (3) (Spring): 423–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diuk, Nadia. 2006. “The Triumph of Civil Society.” In Revolution in Orange: The Origins of Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough, Åslund, Anders and McFaul, Michael. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 6984.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Laitin, David. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.”American Political Science Review 97 (1) (February): 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, Jaime R. S. 2008. “The Application of Mixture Modeling and Information Criteria for Discovering Patterns of Coronary Heart Disease.” Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods 3 (4): 292303.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 1994. “Is Revolution Individually Rational?Rationality and Society 6: 139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2001. “Toward a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory.”Annual Review of Political Science 4: 139–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2011. “Cross-class Coalitions and the Making of the Arab Revolts of 2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 17: 457–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2005. “Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” World Politics 58 (October): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1995. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. Revolutionary Change. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Karatnycky, Adrian. 2005. “Ukraine's Orange Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 84 (2): 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 2010. “Peace Demonstrations or Anti-Government Marches? The Political Attitudes of the Protesters.” In The World Says No To War: Demonstrations Against the War on Iraq, eds. Walgrave, Stefaan and Ruchts, Dieter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 98118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 2010. “Nationalism, Identity and Civil Society in Ukraine: Understanding the Orange Revolution.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43: 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, David. 2008. “The Orange Revolution: ‘People's Revolution’ or Revolutionary Coup?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (4): 525–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Marc I. 1995. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwell, Gerald, and Oliver, Pamela. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro‐Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Paulsen, Ronelle. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Social Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (November): 640–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2010. “Importing Revolution: Internal and External Factors in Ukraine's Democratic Breakthrough.” In Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Postcommunist World, eds. Bunce, Valerie, McFaul, Michael, and Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 329.Google Scholar
Mueller, Lisa. 2011. “Democratic Revolutionaries or Pocketbook Protestors? The Comparative Salience of Personal Rule and Famine in the Nigerien Uprisings of 2009.” Paper presented at the Working Group in African Political Economy, Stanford University. http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/miscellaneous_files/wgape/21_Mueller.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Myagkov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shakin, Dmitry. 2005. “Fraud or Fairytales: Russia and Ukraine's Electoral Experience.” Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (2): 91131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson-Yaouzis, Nicolas. 2010. “Revolutionaries, Despots, and Rationality.” Rationality and Society 22 (3): 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2005. “Ukraine Presidential Election 31 October, 21 November and 26 December 2004.” http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/ukraine/14674.Google Scholar
Panina, Natalya. 2005. Ukrainian Society 1994–2005: Sociological Monitoring. Kyiv: International Center for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger D. 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (1): 203–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanenko, Viktor. 2005. “How Ukrainians View Their Orange Revolution: Public Opinion and the National Peculiarities of Citizenry Political Activities,” Demokratizatsiya 13 (4) (Fall): 595616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanenko, Victor. 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality?East European Politics and Societies 20 (4): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark R. 2004. Democratic Revolutions: Asia and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark R., and Kuntz, Philipp. 2004. “Stolen Elections: The Case of the Serbian October.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. 1932. The History of the Russian Revolution, Vol. 1. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 2007. “Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 535–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1971. “The Paradox of Revolution.” Public Choice 11: 8999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermunt, Jeroen K., and Magidson, Jay. 2002. “Latent Class Cluster Analysis.” In Applied Latent Class Analysis, eds. Hagenaars, J. A. and McCutcheon, A. L.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 88106.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan. 2008. “The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 19 (July): 5569.Google Scholar
Way, Lucan. 2010. “National Identity and Authoritarianism: Belarus and Ukraine Compared.” In Orange Revolution and Aftermath: Mobilization, Apathy, and the State in Ukraine, ed. D'Anieri, Paul. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 129–59.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy M. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Stephen, and McAllister, Ian. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Orange Revolution,’Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25 (2): 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *