Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 0.569 Render date: 2022-09-25T21:07:21.971Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2012

JESSICA L. WEEKS*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
*
Jessica L. Weeks is Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Cornell University, 210 White Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 (jweeks@cornell.edu).

Abstract

How do domestic institutions affect autocratic leaders’ decisions to initiate military conflicts? Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I argue that institutions in some kinds of dictatorships allow regime insiders to hold leaders accountable for their foreign policy decisions. However, the preferences and perceptions of these autocratic domestic audiences vary, with domestic audiences in civilian regimes being more skeptical of using military force than the military officers who form the core constituency in military juntas. In personalist regimes in which there is no effective domestic audience, no predictable mechanism exists for restraining or removing overly belligerent leaders, and leaders tend to be selected for personal characteristics that make them more likely to use military force. I combine these arguments to generate a series of hypotheses about the conflict behavior of autocracies and test the hypotheses using new measures of authoritarian regime type. The findings indicate that, despite the conventional focus on differences between democracies and nondemocracies, substantial variation in conflict initiation occurs among authoritarian regimes. Moreover, civilian regimes with powerful elite audiences are no more belligerent overall than democracies. The result is a deeper understanding of the conflict behavior of autocracies, with important implications for scholars as well as policy makers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Emanuel. 1992. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control.” International Organization 46 (1): 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreski, Stanislav. 1992. Wars, Revolutions, Dictatorships: Studies of Historical and Contemporary Problems from a Comparative Viewpoint. London: F. Cass.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Arquilla, John, and Moyano Rasmussen, Maria. 2001. “The Origins of the South Atlantic War.” Journal of Latin American Studies 33 (4): 739–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 2007. Cross-national Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem: Databanks International.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 1977. Soldiers, Statesmen, and Cold War Crises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Stephen D. 2004. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Biddle, Stephen, and Zirkle, Robert. 1996. “Technology, Civil-Military Relations, and Warfare in the Developing World.” Journal of Strategic Studies 19 (2): 171212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Van de Walle, Nicholas. 1994. “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa.” World Politics 46 (4): 453–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, Michael. 1996. “Crisis Escalation: Model and Findings.” International Political Science Review 17 (2): 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, Paul. 2000. Non-democratic Regimes: Theory, Government, and Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Risa. 1998. Political-Military Relations and the Stability of Arab Regimes. 324th ed.London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 791807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L., and Pollack, Kenneth M.. 2001. “Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In.” International Security 25 (4): 107–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehabi, Houchang E., and Linz, Juan J.. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, Jose A., Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James R.. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143 (1): 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, H. E. 2003. “Peace through Insecurity: Tenure and International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (4): 443–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, H. E.. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 604–19.Google Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, H. E.. 2011. Leaders and International Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, David H. 2003. “Can Strategic Interaction Divert Diversionary Behavior? A Model of U.S. Conflict Propensity.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1013–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Kevin A., and Stone, Randall W.. 2008. “Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival.” American Political Science Review 102 (3): 387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff. 2010. “Oil and Revolutionary Governments: Fuel for International Conflict.” International Organization 64 (4): 661–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff. N.d. Petro-aggression: How Oil Causes War. New York: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, and Caughey, Devin M.. 2011. “Honor and War: Using Southern Presidents to Identify Reputational Effects in International Conflict.” University of California, Berkeley. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Goemans, H. E.. 2010. “Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War.” American Political Science Review 104: 430–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1994. “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.American Political Science Review 88 (1): 1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, Alexander B. 2008. Targeting Civilians in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1994. “Conflict, Agency, and Gambling for Resurrection: The Principal-Agent Problem Goes to War.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 362–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorov, Georgy, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2011. “Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-off.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (5): 903–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrow, Natasha M., and Frantz, Erica. 2011. Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feaver, Peter, and Gelpi, Christopher. 2004. Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fjelde, Hanne. 2010. “Generals, Dictators, and Kings.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 27 (3): 195218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantz, Erica. 2008. “Tying the Dictator's Hands: Elite Coalitions in Authoritarian Regimes.” Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Frantz, Erica, and Ezrow, Natasha M.. 2009. “‘Yes Men’ and the Likelihood of Foreign Policy Mistakes across Dictatorships.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., and Brzezinski, Zbigniew K.. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics 18 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher. 1997. “Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 255–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher F., and Griesdorf, Michael. 2002. “Winners or Losers? Democracies in International Crisis, 1918-94.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 633–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glad, Betty. 2002. “Why Tyrants Go Too Far: Malignant Narcissism and Absolute Power.” Political Psychology 23 (1): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 2010. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2002. “Expanded Trade and GDP Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5): 712–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, Salehyan, Idean, and Schultz, Kenneth. 2008. “Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (4): 479506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein Erich. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H. E. 2008. “Which Way Out? The Manner and Consequences of Losing Office.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (6): 771–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne S. 1999. Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Kim, Soo Yeon, and Yoon, David H.. 2001. “Dirty Pool.” International Organization 55 (2): 441–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisinger, A., and Smith, A.. 2002. “Honest Threats: The Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (2): 175200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1988. “War, Revolution, and the Growth of the Coercive State.” Comparative Political Studies 21 (1): 4565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Stephen. 2006. “Authoritarian Government.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, eds. Weingast, Barry R. and Wittman, Donald A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 693707.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Axel, and Teorell, Jan. 2007. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, K. J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C., and Stam, Allan C.. 2011. “How Prior Military Experience Influences the Future Militarized Behavior of Leaders.” University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Howell, William G, and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2007. While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 1987. “Conflict and Cohesion: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research.” Cooperation and Conflict 22 (1): 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Leslie. 2006. “Knowing the Unknown.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 228–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1995. “Thinking about Strategic Culture.” International Security 19 (4): 3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Daniel M., Bremer, Stuart A., and Singer, J. David. 1996. “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2): 163213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Ryan. 2009. “Survival and Accountability: An Analysis of the Empirical Support for ‘Selectorate Theory.’“ International Studies Quarterly 53 (3): 695714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth. 1997. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kinne, Brandon J. 2005. “Decision Making in Autocratic Regimes: A Poliheuristic Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (1): 114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, Jonathan. 2007. Appeasing Bankers: Financial Caution on the Road to War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kisangani, Emizet F., and Pickering, Jeffrey. 2009. “The Dividends of Diversion: Mature Democracies’ Proclivity to Use Diversionary Force and the Rewards They Reap from It.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 483515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, and Lewis, Evan. 2003. “Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 569–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Brian, and Slater, Dan. 2006. “Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950-1992.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 1992. “Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2010. “Two Cheers for Bargaining Theory: Assessing Rationalist Explanations of the Iraq War.” International Security 35 (3): 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, and Davis, David R.. 1997. “Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (6): 814–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1996. “Culture and Preferences in the International Cooperation Two-step.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 118–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Credible Power-sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 2005. “Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes Dataset Version 2.0.” http://psfaculty.ucdavis.edu/zmaoz/dyadmid.html (accessed January 31, 2011)Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 624–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. POLITY IV Project, Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002, Dataset Users’ Manual. College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1995. “Anarchy and Identity.” International Organization 49 (2): 229–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montefiore, Simon Sebag. 2004. Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Howard Campbell, Sally. 1991. “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (2): 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1978. “Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State.” Latin American Research Review 13 (1): 338.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R., and Tir, Jaroslav. 2006. “Does the Diversionary Use of Force Threaten the Democratic Peace? Assessing the Effect of Economic Growth on Interstate Conflict, 1921–2001.” International Studies Quarterly 50 (4): 755–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., Russett, Bruce M., and Berbaum, Michael L.. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oren, Ido, and Hays, Jude. 1997. “Democracies May Rarely Fight One Another, but Developed Socialist States Rarely Fight at All.” Alternatives 22: 493521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peceny, Mark, and Beer, Caroline C.. 2003. “Peaceful Parties and Puzzling Personalists.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peceny, Mark, Beer, Caroline C., and Sanchez-Terry, Shannon. 2002. “Dictatorial Peace?American Political Science Review 96 (1): 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peceny, Mark, and Butler, Christopher K.. 2004. “The Conflict Behavior of Authoritarian Regimes.” International Politics 41 (4): 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2009. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Jeffrey, and Kisangani, Emizet F.. 2005. “Democracy and Diversionary Military Intervention: Reassessing Regime Type and the Diversionary Hypothesis.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Jeffrey, and Kisangani, Emizet F.. 2010. “Diversionary Despots? Comparing Autocracies’ Propensities to Use and to Benefit from Military Force.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2)477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Jerrold M. 2004. Leaders and Their Followers in a Dangerous World: The Psychology of Political Behavior. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Quinlivan, James T. 1999. “Coup-proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East.” International Security 24 (2): 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan, and Stam, Allan C.. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1989. Military Rule in Latin America. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. “Democratic Peace – Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument.” European Journal of International Relations 1 (4): 491517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter. 2005. War and Human Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Saunders, Elizabeth N. 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth. 1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization 53 (2): 233–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19 (1): 72107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sechser, Todd S. 2004. “Are Soldiers Less War-prone than Statesmen?Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (5): 746–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2003. “Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia.” Comparative Politics 36 (1): 81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1996. “Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (1): 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack L. 1984. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack L. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sobek, David. 2005. “Machiavelli's Legacy: Domestic Politics and International Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 179204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinnett, Douglas M., Tir, Jaroslav, Schafer, Philip, Diehl, Paul F., and Gochman, Charles. 2002. “The Correlates of War (COW) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19 (2): 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2009. “Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tir, Jaroslav. 2010. “Territorial Diversion: Diversionary Theory of War and Territorial Conflict.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, and Weeks, Jessica. 2011. “An Experimental Investigation of the Democratic Peace.” Ppresented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle.Google Scholar
Vagts, Alfred. 1958. Defense and Diplomacy: The Soldier and the Conduct of Foreign Relations. New York: King's Crown Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin A., Huth, Paul K., and Croco, Sarah E.. 2010. “Bear Any Burden? How Democracies Minimize the Costs of War.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 528–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Geoffrey. 2010. “Surrendering the Higher Ground: The Abuse of Combatants during War.” Ph.D. diss. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1996. Revolution and War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weart, Spencer R. 1994. “Peace among Democratic and Oligarchic Republics.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (3): 299316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1997. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62 (1): 3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica L. 2009. “Leaders, Accountability, and Foreign Policy in Non-democracies.” Ph.D. diss. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. 2008. “Powerful Patriots: Nationalism, Diplomacy, and the Strategic Logic of Anti-foreign Protest in China.” Ph.D. diss. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jessica Chen. N.d. “Autocratic Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China.” International Organization. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woods, Kevin M., Pease, Michael R., Stout, Mark E., Murray, Williamson, and Lacey, James G.. 2006. Iraqi Perspectives Project: A View of Operation Iraqi Freedom from Saddam's Senior Leadership. Norfolk, VA: United States Joint Forces Command, Joint Center for Operational Analysis.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 2008. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures affect Economic Growth and Investment.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 322–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
174
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *