Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-t6r6x Total loading time: 0.284 Render date: 2022-07-06T06:45:03.997Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2016

JONATHAN W. KUYPER*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
*
Jonathan W. Kuyper is a postdoctoral fellow at Stockholm University (jonathan.kuyper1@gmail.com).

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between non-electoral representatives and democratic legitimacy by combining the recent constructivist turn in political representation with systemic work in deliberative theory. Two core arguments are advanced. First, non-electoral representatives should be judged by their position in a wider democratic system. Second, deliberative democracy offers a productive toolkit by which to evaluate these agents. I develop a framework of systemic representation which depicts the elemental parts of a democratic system and assigns normative standards according to the space occupied. The framework gives priority of democratic analysis to the systemic level. This helps mitigate a central concern in the constructivist turn which suggests that representatives mobilize constituencies in ways that are susceptible to framing and manipulation. I engage in case-study analysis of the collapsed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement to unpack the different spaces occupied by non-electoral representative and elucidate the varied democratic demands that hinge on this positioning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 3765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash. 2012. “On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 867–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 6794.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1998. “The Coming Age of Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Mark B. 2006. “Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2): 203225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauchard, Simon. 2014. “Can Descriptive Representation Change Beliefs about a Stigmatized Group? Evidence from Rural India.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2009. “In Praise of Exclusion.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1172–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter, and Braithwaite, John. 2002. Informational Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy. London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1996. “Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 475–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2009. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (11): 1379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2010. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38 (3): 319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S., and Niemeyer, Simon. 2008. “Discursive Representation.” American Political Science Review 102 (4): 481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dür, Andreas, and Mateo, Gemma. 2014. “Public Opinion and Interest Group Influence: How Citizen Groups Derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (8): 1199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1960. Pressure Group Politics: The Case of the British Medical Association. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 4068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levine, David S. 2011. “Transparency Soup: The ACTA Negotiating Process and ‘Black Box’ Lawmaking.” American University International Law Review 26 (3): 811–37.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Terry. 2008. Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. “The ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2011. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives.” Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1094–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näsström, Sofia. 2015. “Democratic Representation Beyond Election.” Constellations 22 (1): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, David, and Smith, Graham. 2015. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John, and Mansbridge, Jane, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, Jennifer C. 2014. “The Misuse of Power, Not Bad Representation: Why it is Beside the Point that No One Elected Oxfam.” Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (2): 204–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2009. “Authorization and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2014. “Shape-Shifting Representation.” American Political Science Review 108 (4): 723–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäferhoff, Marco, Campe, Sabine, and Kaan, Christopher. 2009. “Transnational Public-private Partnerships in International Relations: Making Sense of Concepts, Research Frameworks, and Results.” International Studies Review 11 (3): 451–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan K. 2013. “Revenge of the ‘Nerds’: Collective Action against Intellectual Property Maximalism in the Global Information Age.” International Studies Review 15 (1): 6785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2000. “Representation as Advocacy: A Study of Democratic Deliberation.” Political Theory 28 (6): 758–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Warren, Mark. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2011. “Coercion and (Global) Justice.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 205–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E. 2012. “When, Where and Why Do We Need Deliberation, Voting and Other Means of Organizing Democracy? A Problem-based Approach to Democratic Systems.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2012.Google Scholar
White, Jonathan, and Ypi, Lea. 2011. “On Partisan Political Justification.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 381–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Democracy and Inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
44
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *