Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-m7vrx Total loading time: 0.186 Render date: 2022-12-08T03:08:31.951Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2002

Håvard Hegre
Affiliation:
Håvard Hegre is a Researcher, and Scott Gates and Nils Petter Gleditsch are Research Professors at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Fuglehauggata 11, Oslo, Norway. Tanja Ellingsen is Research Fellow at the Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway. Hegre is also affiliated with the University of Oslo, Gates with Michigan State University, and Gleditsch with the Norwegian University of Science of Technology. The authors may be contacted at cwp@prio.no,,

Abstract

Coherent democracies and harshly authoritarian states have few civil wars, and intermediate regimes are the most conflict-prone. Domestic violence also seems to be associated with political change, whether toward greater democracy or greater autocracy. Is the greater violence of intermediate regimes equivalent to the finding that states in political transition experience more violence? If both level of democracy and political change are relevant, to what extent is civil violence related to each? Based on an analysis of the period 1816–1992, we conclude that intermediate regimes are most prone to civil war, even when they have had time to stabilize from a regime change. In the long run, since intermediate regimes are less stable than autocracies, which in turn are less stable than democracies, durable democracy is the most probable end-point of the democratization process. The democratic civil peace is not only more just than the autocratic peace but also more stable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *