Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T11:27:28.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turning Out to Vote: The Costs of Finding and Getting to the Polling Place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

University of California, Berkeley
Binghamton University
Henry E. Brady is Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 210 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 (
John E. McNulty is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY 13902 (


Could changing the locations of polling places affect the outcome of an election by increasing the costs of voting for some and decreasing them for others? The consolidation of voting precincts in Los Angeles County during California's 2003 gubernatorial recall election provides a natural experiment for studying how changing polling places influences voter turnout. Overall turnout decreased by a substantial 1.85 percentage points: A drop in polling place turnout of 3.03 percentage points was partially offset by an increase in absentee voting of 1.18 percentage points. Both transportation and search costs caused these changes. Although there is no evidence that the Los Angeles Registrar of Voters changed more polling locations for those registered with one party than for those registered with another, the changing of polling places still had a small partisan effect because those registered as Democrats were more sensitive to changes in costs than those registered as Republicans. The effects were small enough to allay worries about significant electoral consequences in this instance (e.g., the partisan effect might be decisive in only about one in two hundred contested House elections), but large enough to make it possible for someone to affect outcomes by more extensive manipulation of polling place locations.

Research Article
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Herr, J.L., and Imbens, G.. 2001. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata.” Stata Journal 1: 118.Google Scholar
Abadie, A., and Imbens, G.. 2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, Andre. 2000. To Vote or Note to Vote. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlisk, John. 1996. “Why Bounded Rationality?Journal of Economic Literature 34 (June): 669700.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dunne, Stephanie, Reed, W. Robert, and Wilbanks, James. 1997. “Endogenizing the Median Voter: Public Choice Goes to School.” Public Choice 93: 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Joshua J., and Gimpel, James G.. 2005. “Distance, Turnout, and the Convenience of Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 86: 531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedderson, Timothy J. 2004. “Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting.” American Economic Perspective 18 (1): 99128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedderson, Timothy J., and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. 1996. “The Swing Voter's Curse.” American Economic Review 86 (3): 408–24.Google Scholar
Fedderson, Timothy J., and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. 1999. “Abstention in Elections with Asymmetric Information and Diverse Preferences.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedderson, Timothy J., and Sandroni, Alvaro. 2006. “A Theory of Participation in Elections.” American Economic Review 96 (4): 1271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, Green, Donald, and Shachar, Ron. 2003. “Voting May be Habit-forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., Dyck, Joshua J., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2006. “Location, Knowledge, and Time Pressures in the Spatial Structure of Convenience Voting.” Electoral Studies 25 (1): 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Schuknecht, Jason E.. 2003. “Political Participation and the Accessibility of the Ballot Box.” Political Geography 22: 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R.E., and Roberts, K.W.S.. 1975. “The Ethical Voter.” American Political Science Review 69 (3): 926–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haspel, Moshe, and Knotts, H. Gibbs. 2005. “Location, Location, Location: Precinct Placement and the Costs of Voting.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin. 1997. “Easy Registration and Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 59 (2): 565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin. 2004. “Voter Registration and Turnout in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Paul. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396): 945–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, Guido. 2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Exogeneity: A Review.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1995. “Does ‘Motor Voter’ Work? Evidence from State-level Data.” Journal of Politics 57 (3): 796811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen, and White, James. 2000. “Election-day Registration and Turnout Inequality.” Political Behavior 22 (1): 2944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1992. “Individual and Systemic Influences on Turnout: Who Votes? 1984.” Journal of Politics 54 (3): 718–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, John E., Dowling, Conor M., and Ariotti, Margaret H. (Molly). 2009. “Driving Saints to Sin: How Increasing the Difficulty of Voting Dissuades Even the Most Motivated Voters.” Political Analysis 17 (4): 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MebaneWalter R., Jr. Walter R., Jr., and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 1998. “Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives: Theory and Application to Nonlinear Models.” Political Analysis 7: 189213.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Stephen L., and Harding, David J.. 2006. “Matching Estimators of Causal Effects: Prospects and Pitfalls in Theory and Practice.” Sociological Methods and Research 35 (1): 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Casey B., and Hunter, Charles G.. 2003. “The Empirical Frequency of a Pivotal Vote.” Public Choice 116: 3154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, Jerzey. 1923. “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments: Essay on Principles, Section 9.” Edited and translated by Dabrowska, D.M. and Speed, T.P.. Statistical Science 5 (4): 465–72.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G. 1976. “Costs of Voting and Nonvoting.” Public Choice 27: 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. “Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty.” American Political Science Review 79 (1): 6278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Steve W., and Bryk, Anthony S.. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Method. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1973. An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul. 2002. Observational Studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1978. “The Effect of Voter Registration Laws on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 72 (1): 2245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Daniel. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1980. “On the Costs, Utilities and Simple Joys of Voting.” Journal of Politics 42 (3): 854–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. N.d. “Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for R.” Journal of Statistical Software. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Robert, and Glass, David P.. 1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1998. “Early Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (1): 5759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpone, R.J. 1998. “Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States.” American Political Science Review 92 (1): 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole J. 1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 390422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar