Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics

  • GEOFFREY C. LAYMAN (a1), THOMAS M. CARSEY (a2), JOHN C. GREEN (a3), RICHARD HERRERA (a4) and ROSALYN COOPERMAN (a5)...
Abstract

Party activists have played a leading role in “conflict extension”—the polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensions—in contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Geoffrey C. Layman is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame, 217 O'Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 (glayman@nd.edu).
Thomas M. Carsey is Pearsall Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (carsey@unc.edu).
John C. Green is Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Akron, 223B Olin Hall, Akron, OH 44325 (green@uakron.edu).
Richard Herrera is Associate Professor, School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University, Coor Hall, 6th Floor, Tempe, AZ 85287 (richard.herrera@asu.edu).
Rosalyn Cooperman is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Affairs, University of Mary Washington, 1301 College Avenue, Fredericksburg, VA 22401 (rcooperm@umw.edu).
References
Hide All
Abramowitz Alan I., McGlennon John J., and Rapoport Ronald B.. 1983. “The Party Isn't Over: Incentives for Activism in the 1980 Presidential Nominating Campaign.” Journal of Politics 45: 1006–15.
Abramowitz Alan I., McGlennon John, Rapoport Ronald B., and Stone Walter J.. 1996. Activists in the United States Presidential Nomination Process, 1980–1996 [computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. Williamsburg, VA: Alan I. Abramowitz et al. [producers], 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2001.
Abramowitz Alan I., and Saunders Kyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60: 634–52.
Abramowitz Alan I., and Saunders Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?Journal of Politics 70: 542–55.
Aldrich John H. 1980. Before the Convention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich John H. 1983a. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism.” American Political Science Review 77: 974–90.
Aldrich John H. 1983b. “A Spatial Model with Party Activists: Implications for Electoral Dynamics.” Public Choice 41: 63100.
Aldrich John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich John H., and Rohde David W.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection. In Congress Reconsidered. 7th ed., eds. Dodd Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 269–92.
Andersen T. W. 1957. “Maximum Likelihood Estimates for a Multivariate Normal Distribution When Some Observations Are Missing.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 52 (278): 200203.
Bentler Peter M., and Bonett Douglas G.. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.” Psychological Bulletin 88: 588606.
Black Earl, and Black Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black Earl, and Black Merle. 2007. Divided America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bollen Kenneth A. 1986. “Sample Size and Bentler and Bonett's Nonnormed Fit Index.” Psychometrika 51: 375–77.
Bollen Kenneth A. 1989. “A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 17: 303–16.
Brewer Mark D. 2005. “The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 219–30.
Brewer Mark D., and Stonecash Jeffrey M.. 2006. Split: Class and Cultural Divides in American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Brownstein Ronald. 2007. The Second Civil War. New York: Penguin Press.
Campbell Angus, Converse Philip E., Miller Warren E., and Stokes Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carmines Edward G. 1991. “The Logic of Party Alignments.”Journal of Theoretical Politics 3: 6585.
Carmines Edward G., and Stimson James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carsey Thomas M., and Layman Geoffrey C.. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50: 464–77.
Carson Jamie L., Crespin Michael H., Finocchiaro Charles J., and Rohde David W.. 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (6): 878904.
Cohen Marty, Karol David, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Converse Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter David E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.
Conway M. Margaret, and Feigert Frank B..1968. “Motivations, Incentive Systems, and the Political Party Organization.” American Political Science Review 62: 1159–73.
Cox Gary W., and McCubbins Matthew Daniel. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cox Gary W., and McCubbins Matthew Daniel. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Davis Otto A., Hinich Melvin, and Ordeshook Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.”American Political Science Review 64: 426–48.
De Boef Suzanna L., and Keele Luke. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184200.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Evans Rowland, and Novak Robert. 1966. Lyndon B. Johnson: The Exercise of Power. New York: New American Library.
Fiorina Morris P., with Abrams Samuel J. and Pope Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Richard Fleisher, and Bond Jon R.. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the U.S. Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 429–51.
Freeman Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly, 101 (3): 327–56.
Gerring John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gimpel James G. and Schuknecht Jason E.. 2001. “Interstate Migration and Electoral Politics.” Journal of Politics 63: 207231.
Granger Clive W. J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relation by Econometric and Cross-sectional Method.” Econometrica 37: 424–38.
Hacker Jacob S., and Pierson Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Herrera Richard. 1992. “The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 45: 1021–35.
Jacobson Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond Jon R. and Fleisher Richard Washington, DC: CQ Press, 930.
Karol David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kirkpatrick Jeane J. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. New York: Sage.
Kline Rex B. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford.
Krosnick Jon A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 5992.
Krugman Paul. 2002. “America the Polarized.” New York Times, Jan. 4: A21.
Layman Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Layman Geoffrey C., and Carsey Thomas M.. 2002a. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 786802.
Layman Geoffrey C., and Carsey Thomas M.. 2002b. “Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies.” Political Behavior 24: 199236.
Layman Geoffrey C., Carsey Thomas M., and Horowitz Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 83110.
Lee Frances E. 2009.Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Masket Seth. 2007. “It Takes An Outsider: Extra-legislative Organization And Partisanship in the California Assembly, 1849–2006.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 482–97.
Mayhew David. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCann James A. 1995. “Nomination Politics and Ideological Polarization: Assessing the Attitudinal Effects of Campaign Involvement.” Journal of Politics 57: 101–20.
McCarty Nolan, Poole Keith T., and Rosenthal Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McClosky Herbert, Hoffman Paul, and O'Hara Rosemary, 1960. “Issue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers.” American Political Science Review 54: 406–72.
Miller Gary, and Schofield Norman. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review 97: 245–60.
Miller Gary, and Schofield Norman. 2008. “The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S.” Perspectives on Politics 6: 433–50.
Miller Warren E., and Jennings M. Kent. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Sage.
Noel Hans. 2006. “The Coalition Merchants: How Ideologues Shape American Politics.” Ph.D. diss. University of California at Los Angeles.
Oldfield Duane. 1996. The Right and the Righteous. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Polsby Nelson W. 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polsby Nelson W. 2005. How Congress Evolves. New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole Keith T., and Rosenthal Howard. 2006. Ideology and Congress: 2nd, rev. ed. of Congress: A Political–Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Rapoport Ronald B., and Stone Walter J.. 1994. “A Model for Disaggregating Political Change.” Political Behavior 16: 505–32.
Reichley A. James. 1987. “The Evangelical and Fundamentalist Revolt.” In Piety and Politics: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists Confront the World, eds. Neuhaus Richard John and Cromrartie Michael. Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
Riker William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.
Rohde David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Saunders Kyle L., and Abramowitz Alan I.. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.” American Politics Research 32: 285309.
Schattschneider E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
Schlesinger Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Schofield Norman, and Miller Gary. 2007. “Elections and Activist Coalitions in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 518–31.
Schumpeter Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.
Sinclair Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
Stone Walter J. 1991. “On Party Switching among Presidential Activists: What Do We Know?American Journal of Political Science 35: 598607.
Stone Walter J., and Abramowitz Alan I.. 1983. “Winning May Not Be Everything, But It's More Than We Thought.” American Political Science Review 77: 945–56.
Stonecash Jeffrey M., Brewer Mark D., and Mariani Mack D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Sundquist James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Theriault Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
White Theodore H. 1973. The Making of the President, 1972. New York: Bantam.
Wilcox Clyde, and Larson Carin. 2006. Onward Christian Soldiers? The Religious Right in American Politics. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Wildavsky Aaron. 1965. “The Goldwater Phenomenon: Purists, Politicians, and the Two-party System.” Review of Politics 27: 393–99.
Wilson James Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Layman et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (318 KB)
318 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 184 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 858 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.