Skip to main content

Agency Problems in Political Campaigns: Media Buying and Consulting


Advertising expenditures in congressional campaigns are made not directly by campaigns themselves but indirectly though intermediary firms. Using a new dataset of revenues and costs of these firms, we study the markups that these firms charge candidates. We find that markups are higher for inexperienced candidates relative to experienced candidates, and PACs relative to candidates. We also find significant differences across the major parties: firms working for Republicans charge higher prices, exert less effort, and induce less responsiveness in their clients’ advertising expenditures to electoral circumstances than do their Democratic counterparts. We connect this observation to the distribution of ideology among individual consulting firm employees, arguing that these higher rents incentivize consultants to work against their intrinsic ideological motivations. The internal organization of firms reflects an attempt to mitigate this conflict of interest; firms are composed of ideologically homogeneous employees, and are more likely to work for ideologically proximate clients.

Corresponding author
Gregory J. Martin is an Assistant Professor, Emory University, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (
Zachary Peskowitz is an Assistant Professor, Emory University, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (
Hide All

We received valuable comments from seminar audiences at Caltech, Stanford GSB, Emory, the University of Houston Political Economy Conference, and MPSA. We thank Tom Clark for his advice and guidance on this project and Sean Cain and Brian Richter for helpful discussant comments.

Hide All
Ansolabehere Stephen, Iyengar Shanto, Simon Adam, and Valentino Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?American Political Science Review 88 (4): 829–38.
Ball Molly. 2016. “There’s Nothing Better Than a Scared, Rich Candidate: How Political Consulting Works – Or Doesn’t.” The Atlantic (). issn: .
Bawn Kathleen, Cohen Martin, Karol David, Masket Seth, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.
Besley Timothy, and Ghatak Maitreesh. 2005. “Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents.American Economic Review 95 (3): 616–36.
Bonica Adam. 2013. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections., accessed December 14, 2015.
Bonica Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–86.
Cain Sean A. 2011. “An Elite Theory of Political Consulting and Its Implications for U.S. House Election Competition.Political Behavior 33 (3): 375405.
Carnes Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Center for Responsive Politics. 2016., accessed December 5, 2016.
Coleman John J., and Manna Paul F.. 2000. “Congressional Campaign Spending and the Quality of Democracy.Journal of Politics 62 (3): 757–89.
Dulio David A. 2004. For Better or Worse? How Political Consultants are Changing Elections in the United States. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Enos Ryan D., and Hersh Eitan D.. 2015. “Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem.American Political Science Review 109 (2): 252–78.
Farrell David M. 1998. “Political Consultancy Overseas: The Internationalization of Campaign Consultancy.PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 171–6.
Franz Michael M., Fowler Erika Franklin, and Ridout Travis N.. 2016. “Loose Cannons or Loyal Foot Soldiers? Toward a More Complex Theory of Interest Group Advertising Strategies.American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 738–51.
Gerber Alan S., Gimpel James G., Green Donald P., and Shaw Daron R.. 2011. “How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment.American Political Science Review 105 (1): 135–50.
Green Donald Philip, and Krasno Jonathan S.. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.American Journal of Political Science 32 (4): 884907.
Grossmann Matt. 2009. “Campaigning as an Industry: Consulting Business Models and Intra-Party Competition.Business and Politics 11 (1): 119.
Herrnson Paul S. 1992. “Campaign Professionalism and Fundraising in Congressional Elections.Journal of Politics 54 (3): 859–70.
Hirsch Alexander V., and Montagnes B. Pablo. 2015. “The Lobbyist’s Dilemma: Gatekeeping and the Profit Motive.” Working paper, California Institute of Technology,
Huber Gregory A., and Arceneaux Kevin. 2007. “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising.American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 957–77.
Jacobson Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.American Political Science Review 72 (2): 469–91.
Johnson Dennis W. 2012. “Formative Years of Political Consulting in America, 1934-2000.Journal of Political Marketing 11 (1-2): 5474.
Kang Karam, and You Hye Young. 2015. “Lobbyists as Matchmakers in the Market for Access.” Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University,
Koger Gregory, Masket Seth, and Noel Hans. 2009. “Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks.British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 633–54.
Kolodny Robin, and Dulio David A.. 2003. “Political Party Adaptation in U.S. Congressional Campaigns: Why Political Parties Use Coordinated Expenditures to Hire Political Consultants.Party Politics 9 (6): 729–46.
Kolodny Robin, and Logan Angela. 1998. “Political Consultants and the Extension of Party Goals.PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 155–9.
Krishna Vijay, and Morgan John. 2001. “A Model of Expertise.Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 747–75.
Lovett Mitchell, and Peress Michael. 2015. “Targeting Political Advertising on Television.Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 391432.
Mann Christopher B., and Klofstad Casey A.. 2015. “The Role of Call Quality in Voter Mobilization: Implications for Electoral Outcomes and Experimental Design.Political Behavior 37 (1): 135–54.
Martin Gregory J., and Peskowitz Zachary. 2015. “Parties and Electoral Performance in the Market for Political Consultants.Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 441–70.
McPherson Miller, Smith-Lovin Lynn, and Cook James M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.
Medvic Stephen K. 2001. Political Consultants in U.S. Congressional Elections. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.
Medvic Stephen K. 2006. “Understanding Campaign Strategy: ‘Deliberate Priming’ and the Role of Professional Political Consultants.Journal of Political Marketing 5 (1-2): 1132.
Medvic Stephen K., and Lenart Silvo. 1997. “The Influence of Political Consultants in the 1992 Congressional Elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (1): 61–77.
Nyhan Brendan, and Montgomery Jacob M.. 2015. “Connecting the Candidates: Consultant Networks and the Diffusion of Campaign Strategy in American Congressional Elections.American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 292308.
Plasser Fritz. 2000. “American Campaign Techniques Worldwide.Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5 (4): 3354.
Seelye Katharine Q. December 6, 2004. “How to Sell a Candidate to a Porsche-Driving, Leno-Loving Nascar Fan.The New York Times., accessed May 14, 2016.
Sheingate Adam. 2016. Building a Business of Politics: The Rise of Political Consulting and the Transformation of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skinner Richard, Masket Seth, and Dulio David. 2013. “527 Committees, Formal Parties, and Party Adaptation.The Forum 11 (2): 137–56.
Steen Jennifer A. 2006. Self-Financed Candidates in Congressional Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Sulkin Tracy. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Martin and Peskowitz supplementary material
Martin and Peskowitz supplementary material 1

 PDF (189 KB)
189 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 118 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1107 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th December 2017 - 22nd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.