Skip to main content
×
×
Home

An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s–1970s*

  • John L. Sullivan (a1), James Piereson (a2) and George E. Marcus (a3)
Abstract

This article proposes an alternative conceptualization of political tolerance, a new measurement strategy consistent with that conceptualization, and some new findings based upon this measurement strategy. Briefly put, we argue that tolerance presumes a political objection to a group or to an idea, and if such an objection does not arise, neither does the problem of tolerance. Working from this understanding, we argue that previous efforts to measure tolerance have failed because they have asked respondents about groups preselected by the investigators. Those groups selected as points of reference in measuring tolerance have generally been of a leftist persuasion. Our measurement strategy allowed respondents themselves to select a political group to which they were strongly opposed. They were then asked a series of questions testing the extent to which they were prepared to extend procedural claims to these self-selected targets. Using this approach, we found little change between the 1950s and the 1970s in levels of tolerance in the United States, a result that contradicts much recent research on the problem.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We wish to express our thanks to the University of Minnesota Graduate School and to the National Science Foundation, grant SOC 77–17623, for supporting this study. Considerable appreciation is extended to the following for their most helpful comments on an earlier version of this article: David Booth, David Colby, William Flanigan, Daniel Minns, Leroy Rieselbach, W. Phillips Shively, James Stimson, Robert Weissberg, and James Davis. We could not take all of their advice because often it was contradictory, but the final product would have been considerably weakened were it not for their help.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abrams v. United States (1919). 250 U.S. 616.
Berns, Walter (1962). “Voting Studies.” In Storing, Herbert J. (ed.), Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Cooke, Jacob, ed. (1961). The Federalist. Cleveland: World Publishing Co.
Crick, Bernard (1973). Political Theory and Practice. New York: Basic Books.
Dahl, Robert (1976). Democracy in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Davis, James A. (1975). “Communism, Conformity, Cohorts, and Categories: American Tolerance in 1954 and 1972–73.” American Journal of Sociology 81:491513.
Jackman, Robert (1972). “Political Elites, Mass Publics, and Support for Democratic Principles.” Journal of Politics 34:753–73.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). “A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 34:182202.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). “A General Method for Analysis of Covariance Structures.” Biometrika 57:239–51.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). “A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System.” In Goldberger, A. S. and Duncan, O. D. (eds.), Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar, pp. 85112.
Lawrence, David (1976). “Procedural Norms and Tolerance: A Reassessment.” American Political Science Review 70:80100.
McClosky, Herbert (1964). “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58:361–82.
Nunn, Clyde A., Crockett, Harry J. and Williams, J. Allen (1978). Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pateman, Carole (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles W. (1960). “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and DisagreementJournal of Politics 22:276–94.
Stouffer, Samuel (1955). Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E. and Marcus, George (1978). “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.” American Journal of Political Science 22:233–49.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., Marcus, George E. and Feldman, Stanley (1979). “The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same: The Stability of Mass Belief Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 23:176–86.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed