Roberts, Robert 2018. The Search for Accountability: United States v. McDonnell and the Fundamental Right to Honest Government. Public Integrity, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 13.
Pavlik, Jamie Bologna 2017. Political importance and its relation to the federal prosecution of public corruption. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 346.
Zhang, Yahong and Kim, Min-Hyu 2017. Do Public Corruption Convictions Influence Citizens’ Trust in Government? The Answer Might Not Be a Simple Yes or No. The American Review of Public Administration, p. 027507401772879.
Fedderke, Johannes and Jett, Dennis 2017. What price the court of St. James? Political influences on ambassadorial postings of the United States of America. Governance, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 483.
Bologna, Jamie 2017. CORRUPTION, PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION, AND INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE U.S. STATES. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 137.
Zhu, Jiangnan and Zhang, Dong 2017. Weapons of the Powerful: Authoritarian Elite Competition and Politicized Anticorruption in China. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 50, Issue. 9, p. 1186.
Nyhan, Brendan 2017. Media Scandals Are Political Events. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 70, Issue. 1, p. 223.
Stritch, Justin M. Pedersen, Mogens Jin and Taggart, Gabel 2017. The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Mechanical Turk (MTURK) in Public Administration and Management Scholarship. International Public Management Journal, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 489.
Dincer, Oguzhan and Johnston, Michael 2017. Political Culture and Corruption Issues in State Politics: A New Measure of Corruption Issues and a Test of Relationships to Political Culture. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 131.
Nelson, Michael J. and Ostrander, Ian 2016. Keeping Appointments: The Politics of Confirming United States Attorneys. Justice System Journal, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 211.
Robertson, Christopher Winkelman, D. Alex Bergstrand, Kelly and Modzelewski, Darren 2016. The Appearance and the Reality ofQuid Pro QuoCorruption: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 375.
Hjorth, Frederik 2016. Intergroup Bias in Parliamentary Rule Enforcement. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 69, Issue. 4, p. 692.
Cordis, Adriana S. and Milyo, Jeffrey 2016. Measuring Public Corruption in the United States: Evidence From Administrative Records of Federal Prosecutions. Public Integrity, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 127.
Campante, Filipe R. and Do, Quoc-Anh 2014. Isolated Capital Cities, Accountability, and Corruption: Evidence from US States. American Economic Review, Vol. 104, Issue. 8, p. 2456.
Hollibaugh, Gary E. Horton, Gabriel and Lewis, David E. 2014. Presidents and Patronage. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 1024.
Alt, J. E. and Lassen, D. D. 2014. Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from the American States. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 306.
Hingwala, Jay Diamond, Jeff Tangri, Navdeep Bueti, Joe Rigatto, Claudio Sood, Manish M. Verrelli, Mauro and Komenda, Paul 2013. Underutilization of peritoneal dialysis: the role of the nephrologist's referral pattern. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 732.
Konisky, D. M. and Reenock, C. 2013. Case Selection in Public Management Research: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 361.
Lewis, David E. and Waterman, Richard W. 2013. The Invisible Presidential Appointments: An Examination of Appointments to the Department of Labor, 2001-11. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 35.
Dong, Bin Dulleck, Uwe and Torgler, Benno 2012. Conditional corruption. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 609.
The 2007 U.S. Attorney firing scandal raised the specter of political bias in the prosecution of officials under federal corruption laws. Has prosecutorial discretion been employed to persecute enemies or shield allies? To answer this question, I develop a model of the interaction between officials contemplating corruption and a prosecutor deciding whether to pursue cases against them. Biased prosecutors will be willing to file weaker cases against political opponents than against allies. Consequently, the model anticipates that in the presence of partisan bias, sentences of prosecuted opponents will tend to be lower than those of co-partisans. Employing newly collected data on public corruption prosecutions, I find evidence of partisan bias under both Bush (II) and Clinton Justice Departments. However, additional evidence suggests that these results may understate the extent of bias under Bush, while overstating it under Clinton.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.