Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison

  • MARK ANDREAS KAYSER (a1) and MICHAEL PERESS (a2)
Abstract

When the economy in a single country contracts, voters often punish the government. When many economies contract, voters turn against their governments much less frequently. This suggests that the international context matters for the domestic vote, yet most research on electoral accountability assumes that voters treat their national economies as autarkic. We decompose two key economic aggregates—growth in real gross domestic product and unemployment—into their international and domestic components and demonstrate that voters hold incumbents more electorally accountable for the domestic than for the international component of growth. Voters in a wide variety of democracies benchmark national economic growth against that abroad, punishing (rewarding) incumbents for national outcomes that underperform (outperform) an international comparison. Tests suggest that this effect arises not from highly informed voters making direct comparisons but from “pre-benchmarking” by the media when reporting on the economy. The effect of benchmarked growth exceeds that of aggregate national growth by up to a factor of two and outstrips the international component of growth by an even larger margin, implying that previous research may have underestimated the strength of the economy on the vote.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Mark Andreas Kayser is Professor of Applied Methods and Comparative Politics, Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180, 10117 Berlin, Germany (kayser@hertie-school.org).
Michael Peress is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Rochester, Harkness Hall 326, Rochester, NY 14627 (mperess@mail.rochester.edu).
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2002. “Blind Retrospection: Electoral Responses to Droughts, Flu, and Shark Attacks.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Allers, Maarten A., and Elhorst, . 2005. “Tax Mimicking and Yardstick Competition among Local Governments in the Netherlands.” International Tax and Public Finance 12 (4): 493513.
Anderson, Christopher J. 2007. “The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (1): 271–96.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Meredith, Marc, and Snowberg, Erik. 2008. “Sociotropic Voting and the Media.” American National Electron Study Pilot Study Reports.
Besley, Timothy, and Case, Anne. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-seeking, Tax-setting, and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review 85 (1): 2545.
Besley, Timothy, and Kudamatsu, Masayuki. 2006. “Health and Democracy.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 313–18.
Blaydes, Lisa, and Kayser, Mark A.. 2011. “Counting Calories: Democracy and Distribution in the Developing World.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (4): 887908.
Bosch, Núria, and Solé-Ollé, Albert. 2007. “Yardstick Competition and the Political Costs of Raising Taxes: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Municipalities.” International Tax and Public Finance 14 (1): 7192.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter: Unabridged Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 127–40.
Chappell, Henry W., and Veiga, Linda G.. 2000. “Economics and Elections in Western Europe: 1960–97.” Electoral Studies 19 (2/3): 183–97.
Cheibub, Jose A., and Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222–50.
Clark, Andrew E., Frijters, Paul, and Shields, Michael A.. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95144.
Dalton, Russell J., and Anderson, Christopher J., eds. 2011. Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices. New York: Oxford University Press.
DiTella, Rafael, and Robert, MacCulloch, . 2006. “Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 2546.
Dorussen, Han, and Palmer, Harvey D.. 2002. The Context of Economic Voting: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Drake, Paul W. 1998. The International Causes of Democratization, 1974–1990. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Duch, Ray M., Palmer, Harvey D., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 635–52.
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randy. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duch, Ray, and Stevenson, Randy. 2010. “The Global Economy, Competency, and the Economic Vote.” Journal of Politics 72: 105–23.
Easterlin, Richard A. 2003. “Explaining Happiness.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (19): 11176–83.
Ebeid, Michael, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2006. “Economic Geography and Economic Voting: Evidence from US States.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 527–47.
Elff, Martin. 2009. “Social Divisions, Party Positions, and Electoral Behaviour.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 297308.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Anderson, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 194207.
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (1–3): 525.
Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Gasper, John T., and Reeves, Andrew. 2011. “Make It Rain? Retrospection and the Attentitive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 340–55.
Gelineau, Francois, and Remmer, Karen. 2006. “Political Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: The Argentine Experience, 1983–2001.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 133–57.
Gomez, Brad T., and Wilson, J. Matthew. 2001. “Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 899914.
Gomez, Brad T., and Wilson, J. Matthew. 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 127–45.
Grynaviski, Jeffery, and Corrigan, Bryce E.. 2006. “Specification Issues in Proximity Models of Candidate Evaluation (with Issue Importance).” Political Analysis 14: 393420.
Hansen, Susan B. 1999. “Life Is Not Fair: Governors’ Job Performance Ratings and State Economies.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (1): 167–88.
Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil, and Mo, Cecilia H.. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (29): 12804–9.
Hellwig, Timothy T. 2001. “Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1141–62.
Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2007. “Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 283–306.
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 372–95.
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 2010. “If Democracies Need Informed Voters, How Can They Thrive While Expanding Enfranchisement?Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 9: 111–23.
Katz, Jonathan N., and King, Gary. 1999. “A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review 93 (1): 1532.
Kayser, Mark A., and Peress, Michael. 2012. “The Buck Stops over There? Benchmarking Elections in the Open Economy.” Working paper. Hertie School of Governance and University of Rochester.
Kayser, Mark A., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (3): 365–94.
Kinder, Donald, and Kiewiet, Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–41.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary A.. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183219.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Michael D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luttmer, Erzo F. P. 2005. “Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-being.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 963–1002.
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka, P.. New York: Academic Press, 105–42.
Meguid, Bonnie. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Min, B. 2008. “Who Gets Public Goods? Democracy and the Provision of Electrification in the Developing World.” Presented at the University of California-Los Angeles Political Methods Workshop.
Montinola, Gabriella R., and Jackman, Robert W.. 2002. “Sources of Corruption: A Cross-country Study.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (1): 147–70.
Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, eds. Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 933.
Palmer, Harvey D., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1999. “The Electoral Impact of Unexpected Inflation and Economic Growth.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 623–39.
Powell, Bingham G. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Powell, Bingham G., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391414.
Royed, Terry J., Leyden, Kevin M., and Borrelli, Stephen. 2000. “Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's Hypothesis.” British Journal of Political Science 30: 669–98.
Samuels, David, and Hellwig, Timothy. 2010. “Elections and Accountability for the Economy: A Conceptual and Empirical Reassessment.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 20 (4): 393419.
Soroka, Stuart N. 2006. “Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 372–85.
Stevenson, Randy T. 1997. “How Parties Compete: Electoral Performance and Cabinet Participation in Parliamentary Democracies.” Ph.D. diss. University of Rochester.
Tomz, Michael, Tucker, Joshua A., and Wittenberg, Jason. 2002. “An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” Political Analysis 10 (1): 6683.
Tucker, Joshua A. 2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Urquizu-Sancho, Ignacio. 2011. “Coalition Governments and Electoral Behavior: Who Is Accountable? In Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, eds. Schofield, Norman and Caballero, Gonzalo. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 185213.
van der Brug, Wouter, Eijk, Cees van der, and Franklin, Mark N.. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vermeir, Jan, and Heyndels, Bruno. 2006. “Tax Policy and Yardstick Voting in Flemish Municipal Elections.” Applied Economics 38 (19): 2285–98.
Whitehead, Laurence. 1996. “Three International Dimensions of Democratization.” In The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, ed. Laurence Whitehead. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–25.
Whitten, Guy D., and Palmer, Harvey D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 18 (1): 4967.
Wlezien, Christopher, Franklin, Mark, and Twiggs, Daniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.” Political Behavior 19 (1): 717.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Kayser and Peress
Appendix

 PDF (617 KB)
617 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed