Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections

  • JAMES N. DRUCKMAN (a1), MARTIN J. KIFER (a2) and MICHAEL PARKIN (a3)
Abstract

Electoral campaigns are the foundation of democratic governance; yet scholarship on the content of campaign communications remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we advance research on U.S. congressional campaigns by integrating and extending extant theories of campaign communication. We test the resulting predictions with a novel dataset based on candidate Web sites over three election cycles. Unlike television advertisements or newspaper coverage, Web sites provide an unmediated, holistic, and representative portrait of campaigns. We find that incumbents and challengers differ across a broad range of behavior that reflects varying attitudes toward risk, that incumbents’ strategies depend on the competitiveness of the race, and that candidates link negative campaigning to other aspects of their rhetorical strategies. Our efforts provide researchers with a basis for moving toward a more complete understanding of congressional campaigns.

Copyright
Corresponding author
James N. Druckman is Associate Professor of Political Science and Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 601 University Place, Evanston, IL 60208 (druckman@northwestern.edu).
Martin J. Kifer is Assistant Professor of Political Science and Director of the Survey Research Center, High Point University, 833 Montlieu Avenue, High Point, NC 27262 (mkifer@highpoint.edu).
Michael Parkin is Assistant Professor of Politics, Oberlin College, 10 N. Professor Street, Oberlin, OH 44074 (Michael.Parkin@oberlin.edu).
References
Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I., Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 68: 7588.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: The Free Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M.. 2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000.” Election Law Journal 1: 315–38.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James M.. 2004. “Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 487515.
Baumeister, Roy. F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Fickenauer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen D.. 2001. “Bad Is Stronger Than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5: 323–70.
Berelson, Bernhard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bimber, Bruce, and Davis, Richard. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1979. Social Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Bucy, Erik P. 2004. “Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept.” The Information Society 20: 373–83.
BuellEmmett H., Jr. Emmett H., Jr., and Sigelman, Lee. 2008. Attack Politics. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Carson, Jamie L., Engstrom, Erik J., and Roberts, Jason M.. 2006. “Redistricting, Candidate Entry, and U.S. House Elections.” American Political Science Review 50: 283–93.
Chadwick, Andrew. 2006. Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chinni, Dante. 2002. Oct. 29. How the Web Is Changing Election Campaigns. Christian Science Monitor (on-line edition). <http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1029/p02s01-uspo.html>. (August 2, 2007).
Couper, Mick P. 2008. Designing Effective Web Surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Democracy Online Project. 1999. Online Campaigning: A Primer. Washington, DC: Graduate School of Political Management, George Washington University.
Dolan, Kathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Web Sites.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 3144.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98: 671–86.
Druckman, James N., Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Ostermeier, Eric. 2004. “Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image.” The Journal of Politics 66: 1205–27.
Druckman, James N., Kifer, Martin J., and Parkin, Michael. 2007. “The Technological Development of Candidate Web Sites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations.” Social Science Computer Review 25: 425–42.
Druckman, James N., Kifer, Martin J., and Parkin, Michael. N.d. “Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006.” Political Communication. Forthcoming.
Druckman, James N., and McDermott, Rose. 2008. “Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice.”Political Behavior 30: 297321.
Esterling, Kevin M., Lazer, David M. J., and Neblo, Michael A.. 2005. “Home (Page) Style: Determinants of the Quality of House Members’ Web Sites.” International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1: 5063.
Eveland, William P., and Dunwoody, Sharon. 2002. “An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning from the Web and Print.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46: 3453.
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Homestyle: House Members in Their Districts. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, and Company.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 2004. “Keystone Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered, ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Foot, Kirsten A., and Schneider, Steven M.. 2006. Web Campaigning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 85: 11931214.
Franz, Michael M., Freedman, Paul B., Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Ridout, Travis N.. 2008. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Funk, Carolyn L. 1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Politics 61: 700720.
Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gerber, Alan S. 2004. “Does Campaign Spending Work? Field Experiments Provide Evidence and Suggest New Theory.” American Behavioral Scientist 47: 541–74.
Goldstein, Kenneth M. 2004. “What Did They See and When Did They See It?” In The Medium and the Message, ed. Goldstein, Kenneth M. and Strach, Patricia. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Prentice-Hall, 2742.
Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Freedman, Paul. 2002. “Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect.” Journal of Politics 64: 721–40.
Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Rivlin, Joel. 2005. Political Advertising in the 2002 Elections. <http://www.polisci.wisc.edu/tvadvertising/Political%20Advertising%20in%20the%202002%20Elections.htm>. (April 17, 2006).
Gronke, Paul. 2000. The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Groseclose, Timothy. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 862–86.
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Quality through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 908–23.
Ireland, Emilienne, and Nash, Phil Tajitsu. 2001. Winning Campaigns Online: Strategies for Candidates and Causes, 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: Science Writers Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1994. “Issues, Candidate Image, and Priming: The Use of Private Polls in Kennedy's 1960 Presidential Campaign.” American Political Science Review 88: 527–40.
Jacobson, Gary. 1992. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
Jacobson, Gary. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NS: Princeton University Press.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2004. No Holds Barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate Campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Prentice-Hall.
Kern, Montague. 1989. 30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the 80's. New York: Praeger.
Kinder, Donald R. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” In Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, ed. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 233–55.
Kinder, Donald R. 1998. “Opinion and Actions in the Realm of Politics” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T. and Lindzey, Gardner. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 778867.
Koch, Jeffrey. 2008. “Has the Importance of the Incumbency Advantage Diminished in House Elections?” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 31–September 2.
Latimer, Christopher P. 2007. “Utilizing the Internet as a Campaign Tool: The Relationship between Incumbency, Political Party Affiliation, Election Outcomes, and the Quality of Campaign Websites in the United States.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 4: 8195.
Lau, Richard R., and Pomper, Gerald M.. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, Yan. 2004. “Fragmentation of the Structure of Political Communication Research: Diversification or Isolation?” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. Kaid, Lynda Lee. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 69108.
Lipinski, Daniel. 2004. Congressional Communication: Content and Consequences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mark, David. 2006. Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
McDermott, Rose, Fowler, James H., and Smirnov, Oleg. 2008. “On the Evolutionary Origin of Prospect Theory Preferences.” Journal of Politics 70: 335–50.
Miller, Joanne M., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 1996. “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations.” In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 79100.
Neuendorf, Kimberly A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Newman, Bruce I. 1999. Ed. Handbook of Political Marketing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Newman, Bruce I., and Perloff, Richard M.. 2004. “Political Marketing.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. Kaid, Lynda Lee. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1744.
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1993. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Page, Benjamin I. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Palmer, Jerry. 2004. “Source Strategies and Media Audiences.” Journal of Political Marketing 4: 5777.
Perloff, Richard M. 2002. “Political Campaign Persuasion and Its Discontents.” In The Persuasion Handbook, ed. Dillard, James Price, and Pfau, Michael. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 825–50.
Rahn, Wendy M., Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L.. 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Approval.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, John and Kuklinki, James. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen, and Fico, Frederick G.. 1998. Analyzing Media Messages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Riker, William H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric, ed. Calvert, Randell L., Mueller, John, and Wilson, Rick. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Sellers, Patrick. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 92: 159–71.
Semiatin, Richard. 2005. Campaigns in the 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shaw, Daron R. 1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988–96.” American Political Science Review 83: 345–61.
Sides, John M. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 407–36.
Sigelman, Lee, and Buell, Emmett H. Jr. 2003. “You Take the High Road and I'll Take the Low Road? The Interplay of Attack Strategies and Tactics in Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 65: 518–31.
Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Skaperdas, Stergios, and Grofman, Bernard. 1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review 89: 4961.
Southwell, Brian G., and Lee, Mira. 2004. “A Pitfall of New Media? User Controls Exacerbate Editing Effects on Memory.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81: 643–56.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, Howard, Philip N., Schneider, Steven M., and Foot, Kirsten A.. 2003. “The New Political Campaign Position: A Survey of Web Site Producers and Managers.” Presented at annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego (May).
Sulkin, Tracy. 2001. “Explaining Campaign Intensity.” American Politics Research 29: 608–24.
Sulkin, Tracy. 2005. Issue Politics in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sulkin, Tracy, and Evans, Jillian. 2006. “Dynamics of Diffusion: Aggregate Patterns in Congressional Campaign Agendas.” American Politics Research 34: 505–34.
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 1999. “Clarify.” Version 1.2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1. <http://gking.harvard.edu/> (Accessed January 2009).
Trent, Judith S., and Friedenberg, Robert V.. 2008. Political Campaign Communication. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Wason, Peter C. 1959. “The Processing of Positive and Negative Information.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11: 92107.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed