Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Clarifying the Concept of Representation

  • JANE MANSBRIDGE (a1)
Abstract

This response to Andrew Rehfeld's “Representation Rethought” (American Political Science Review 2009) takes up his criticisms of my “Rethinking Representation” (American Political Science Review 2003) to advance a more relational and systematic approach to representation. To this end, it suggests replacing the “trustee” concept of representation with a “selection model” based on the selection and replacement of “gyroscopic” representatives who are both relatively self-reliant in judgment and relatively nonresponsive to sanctions. It explores as well the interaction between representatives’ (and constituents’) perceptions of reality and their normative views of what the representative ought to represent. Building from the concept of surrogate representation and other features of legislative representation, it argues for investigating, both normatively and empirically, not only the characteristics of individual representatives emphasized by Rehfeld's analysis but also the representative–constituent relationship and the larger representative system, including both elected and nonelected representatives, inside and outside the legislature.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Jane Mansbridge is Adams Professor, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (jane_mansbridge@harvard.edu).
References
Hide All
Aristotle, . [335–22 B.C.] 1988. Politics. Trans. Jowett, Benjamin, ed. Everson, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, Douglas R. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Beitz, Charles R. 1989. Political Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Besley, Timothy. 2005. “Political Selection.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (3): 4360.
Besley, Timothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Besley, Timothy, and Ghatak, Maitreesh. 2005. “Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 616–36.
Brennan, Geoffrey. 1996. “Selection and the Currency of Reward.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Goodin, Robert E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burke, Edmund. [1774] 1889. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol.” In The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, Vol. 2. Boston: Little Brown.
Cavanaugh, Thomas E. 1982. “The Calculus of Representation: A Congressional Perspective.” Western Political Quarterly 35 (1): 120–29.
Chabal, Patrick, and Daloz, Jean-Pascal. 2006. Culture Troubles: Politics and the Interpretation of Meaning. London: Hurst.
Davidson, Roger H. 1969. The Role of the Congressman. New York: Pegasus.
Eulau, Heinz, Wahlke, John C., Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, Leroy C.. 1959. “The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” American Political Science Review 53 (3): 742–56.
Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FennoRichard F., Jr. Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, Brown. Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees.”Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–47.
Gimple, James G., Lee, Frances E., and Pearson-Merkovitz, Shanna. 2008. “The Check is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 373–94.
Garrett, Elizabeth. 1996. “Term Limitations and the Myth of the Citizen–Legislator.” Cornell Law Review 81: 623–97.
Herzog, Don. 1998. Poisoning the Minds of the Lower Orders. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kartik, Navin, and Preston McAfee, R.. 2007. “Signaling Character in Electoral Competition.” American Economic Review 97 (3): 852–70.
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.
Kymlicka, Will. 1993. “Group Representation in Canadian Politics.” In Equity and Community, ed. Siedle, F. L.. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Lee, David S., Moretti, Enrico, and Butler, Matthew J.. 2004. “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U.S. House.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 807–60.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369–99.
McGregor, Douglas. 1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McMurray, Carl D., and Parsons, Malcolm B.. 1965. “Public Attitudes toward the Representational Roles of Legislators and Judges.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 9 (2): 167–85.
Montanaro, Laura. 2008. “The Democratic Potential of ‘Self-authorized’ Representatives.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Pettit, Philip. 2008. “Three Conceptions of Democratic Control.” Constellations 15 (1): 4655.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. [1967] 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Prewitt, Kenneth. 1970. “Political Ambitions, Volunteerism, and Electoral Accountability.” American Political Science Review 64 (1): 517.
Pratt, John W., and Zeckhauser, Richard J., eds. 1985. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 1973. The Beliefs of Politicians: Ideology, Conflict, and Democracy in Britain and Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–30.
Rubenstein, Jennifer. 2007. “Accountability in an Unequal World.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 616–32.
Rubenstein, Jennifer. 2008. “The Ethics of NGO Advocacy, or Why It Is OK That No One Elected Oxfam.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297318.
Saward, Michael. 2009. “Authorisation and Authenticity: Representation and the Unelected.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1): 122.
Shipman, Tim. 2008. “Sarah Palin: John McCain's Secret Weapon to Win Over the Reagan Democrats.” Telegraph, September 6. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/2695021/Sarah-Palin-John-McCains-secret-weapon-to-win-over-the-Reagan-Democrats.html (accessed June 24, 2010).
Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1981. The Complete Anti-Federalist, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.
Tremblay, Manon. 2006. “The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass.” Politics and Gender 2 (4): 502–11.
Urbinati, Nadia, and Warren, Mark E.. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387412.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995 Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72 (2): 535–47.
Will, George F. 1992. Restoration: Congress, Term Limits, and the Recovery of Deliberative Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed