Skip to main content

Coercion and (Global) Justice


In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice (in general) are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice (in particular). Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice.

Corresponding author
Laura Valentini is Junior Research Fellow in Politics, Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK OX1 4AW. (
Hide All
Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 3765.
Anderson, Scott. 2006. “Coercion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. (accessed October 31, 2010).
Barry, Brian. 1991. Liberty and Justice: Essays in Political Theory 2. Oxford: Clarendon.
Beitz, Charles. 1975. “Justice and International Relations.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4): 360–89.
Beitz, Charles. 1983. “Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment.”Journal of Philosophy 80 (10): 591600.
Beitz, Charles. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blake, Michael. 2001. “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–96.
Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caney, Simon. 2005. Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, Ian. 1999. A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 1983. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1): 333.
Cohen, G. A. 1991. “Capitalism, Freedom and the Proletariat.” In Liberty, ed. Miller, David. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles. 2006. “Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 147–75.
Dietsch, Peter. N.d. “Rethinking Sovereignty in International Fiscal Policy.” Review of International Studies. Forthcoming.
Dietsch, Peter. 2011. “Tax Competition and Its Effects on Domestic and Global Justice.” In Social Justice, Global Dynamics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, eds. Banai, Ayelet, Ronzoni, Miriam, and Schemmel, Christian. London: Routledge.
Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.
Grewal, David Singh. 2008. Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2001. “Global Inequality and International Institutions.”Metaphilosophy 32 (1/2): 3457.
James, Aaron. 2005a. “Power in Social Organization as the Subject of Justice.”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1): 2549.
James, Aaron. 2005b. “Distributive Justice without Sovereign Rule: The Case of Trade.”Social Theory and Practice 31 (4): 533–59.
Julius, A. J. 2006. “Nagel's Atlas.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 176–92.
Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. John Ladd. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Kutz, Christopher. 2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lamond, Grant. 2000. “The Coerciveness of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (1): 3962.
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGregor, Joan. 1988–89. “Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market.” Philosophy Research Archives 14: 2350.
Meckled-Garcia, Saladin. 2008. “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3): 245–71.
Miller, David. 1983. “Constraints on Freedom.” Ethics 94 (1): 6686.
Miller, David. 1991. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon.
Miller, David. 2002. “Caney's ‘International Distributive Justice’: A Response.” Political Studies 50 (5): 974–77.
Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, David. 2010. “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh.” Political Theory 38 (1): 111–20.
Miller, Richard. 1998. “Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern.”Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3): 202–24.
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2005. “The World Trade Organization and Egalitarian Justice.” Metaphilosophy 36 (1/2): 145–62.
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–47.
Nardin, Terry. 2005. “Justice and Coercion.” In International Society and Its Critics, ed. Bellamy, Alex J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–64.
Nardin, Terry. 2006. “International Political Theory and the Question of Justice.” International Affairs 82 (3): 449–65.
Nozick, Robert. 1969. “Coercion.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, eds. Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P., and White, M.. New York: St Martin's, 440–72.
OECD. 1998. Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue. OECD Report.
O'Neill, Onora. 1991. “Which Are the Offers You Can't Refuse?” In Violence, Terrorism, and Justice, eds. Frey, R. G. and Morris, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170–95.
Orrù, Elisa, and Miriam, Ronzoni. N.d. “Which Supranational Sovereignty? Criminal and Socio-economic Justice Compared.” Review of International Studies. Forthcoming.
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pevnick, Ryan. 2008. “Political Coercion and the Scope of Distributive Justice.” Political Studies 56 (2): 339413.
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics 103 (1): 4875.
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ripstein, Arthur. 2004. “Authority and Coercion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1): 235.
Risse, Mathias. 2005. “Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1): 918.
Risse, Mathias. 2006. “What to Say about the State?Social Theory and Practice 32 (4): 671–98.
Ronzoni, Miriam. 2009. “The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-dependent Account.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (3): 229–56.
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1): 339.
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Responsibility and Justice in Liberal Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2005. “The Overselling of Globalization.” In Globalization: What's New? ed. Weinstein, Michael M.. New York: Columbia University Press, 228–61.
Stilz, Anna. N.d. “Collective Responsibility and the State.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valentini, Laura. 2009. “Cosmopolitan or Social Liberal? Review of D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice.” Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 1 (2): 5053.
Valentini, Laura. 2010. “Review of Gillian Brock, Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13. (accessed October 31, 2010).
Valentini, Laura. N.d. “Global Justice and Practice-dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1991. “Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom.” U.C.L.A. Law Review 39: 295324.
Weber, Max. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society. eds. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. New York: Bedminster Press.
Wenar, Leif. 2002. “The Legitimacy of Peoples.” In Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization, eds. Greiff, Pablo De and Cronin, Ciaran. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 5376.
Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wolff, Robert P. [1970] 1998. In Defense of Anarchism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2004. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 365–88.
Young, Iris Marion. 2006. “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 102–30.
Zimmerman, David. 1981. “Coercive Wage Offers.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2): 121–45.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 250 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 941 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.