Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Straehle, Christine 2012. Territoire, migration et État légitime. Philosophiques, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 393.


    Valentini, Laura 2013. Justice, Charity, and Disaster Relief: What, If Anything, Is Owed to Haiti, Japan, and New Zealand?. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 491.


    Blanc, Sandrine 2016. Are Rawlsian Considerations of Corporate Governance Illiberal? A Reply to Singer. Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 26, Issue. 03, p. 407.


    UEHARA, Kenji 2012. ‘International’ Distributive Justice. The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, Vol. 63, Issue. 2, p. 2_331.


    Nili, Shmuel 2015. Who’s afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist-cosmopolitan debate. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 241.


    Beckman, Ludvig 2014. The Subjects of Collectively Binding Decisions: Democratic Inclusion and Extraterritorial Law. Ratio Juris, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 252.


    Hazenberg, Haye 2015. The legitimacy of the global order. International Theory, Vol. 7, Issue. 02, p. 294.


    Ronzoni, M. 2014. What Does Liberal Legitimacy Really Require?. Analysis, Vol. 74, Issue. 1, p. 99.


    Lanoszka, Alexander 2013. Beyond consent and coercion: using republican political theory to understand international hierarchies. International Theory, Vol. 5, Issue. 03, p. 382.


    Laborde, Cécile and Ronzoni, Miriam 2015. What is a Free State? Republican Internationalism and Globalisation. Political Studies, p. n/a.


    Duus-Otterström, Göran and Jagers, Sverker C. 2012. Identifying burdens of coping with climate change: A typology of the duties of climate justice. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 746.


    ×

Coercion and (Global) Justice

  • LAURA VALENTINI (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000559
  • Published online: 22 February 2011
Abstract

In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice (in general) are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice (in particular). Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Laura Valentini is Junior Research Fellow in Politics, Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKOX1 4AW. (laura.valentini@queens.ox.ac.uk).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Arash Abizadeh . 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 3765.

Charles Beitz . 1983. “Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment.”Journal of Philosophy 80 (10): 591600.

Michael Blake . 2001. “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–96.

Gillian Brock . 2009. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simon Caney . 2005. Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ian Carter . 1999. A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Joshua Cohen and Charles Sabel . 2006. “Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 147–75.

W. B Gallie . 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.

Andrew Hurrell . 2001. “Global Inequality and International Institutions.”Metaphilosophy 32 (1/2): 3457.

Aaron James . 2005a. “Power in Social Organization as the Subject of Justice.”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1): 2549.

Aaron James . 2005b. “Distributive Justice without Sovereign Rule: The Case of Trade.”Social Theory and Practice 31 (4): 533–59.

A. J Julius . 2006. “Nagel's Atlas.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 176–92.


Grant Lamond . 2000. “The Coerciveness of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (1): 3962.

Christian List , and Philip Pettit . 2011. Group Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Joan McGregor . 1988–89. “Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market.” Philosophy Research Archives 14: 2350.

Saladin Meckled-Garcia . 2008. “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3): 245–71.

David Miller . 1983. “Constraints on Freedom.” Ethics 94 (1): 6686.

David Miller . 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon.

David Miller . 2002. “Caney's ‘International Distributive Justice’: A Response.” Political Studies 50 (5): 974–77.

David Miller . 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

David Miller . 2010. “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh.” Political Theory 38 (1): 111–20.

Richard Miller . 1998. “Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern.”Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3): 202–24.

Darrel Moellendorf . 2005. “The World Trade Organization and Egalitarian Justice.” Metaphilosophy 36 (1/2): 145–62.

Thomas Nagel . 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–47.

Terry Nardin . 2006. “International Political Theory and the Question of Justice.” International Affairs 82 (3): 449–65.


Ryan Pevnick . 2008. “Political Coercion and the Scope of Distributive Justice.” Political Studies 56 (2): 339413.

Thomas Pogge . 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics 103 (1): 4875.

Arthur Ripstein . 2004. “Authority and Coercion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1): 235.


Mathias Risse . 2006. “What to Say about the State?Social Theory and Practice 32 (4): 671–98.

Miriam Ronzoni . 2009. “The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-dependent Account.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (3): 229–56.

Andrea Sangiovanni . 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1): 339.


Iris Marion Young . 2004. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 365–88.


Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×