Skip to main content

Collective Action and Representation in Autocracies: Evidence from Russia’s Great Reforms


We explore the relationship between capacity for collective action and representation in autocracies with data from Imperial Russia. Our primary empirical exercise relates peasant representation in new institutions of local self-government to the frequency of peasant unrest in the decade prior to reform. To correct for measurement error in the unrest data and other sources of endogeneity, we exploit idiosyncratic variation in two determinants of peasant unrest: the historical incidence of serfdom and religious polarization. We find that peasants were granted less representation in districts with more frequent unrest in preceding years—a relationship consistent with the Acemoglu-Robinson model of political transitions and inconsistent with numerous other theories of institutional change. At the same time, we observe patterns of redistribution in subsequent years that are inconsistent with the commitment mechanism central to the Acemoglu-Robinson model. Building on these results, we discuss possible directions for future theoretical work.

Corresponding author
Paul Castañeda Dower is an Assistant Professor of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 427 Lorch Street, Madison, WI 53706 (
Evgeny Finkel is an Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, George Washington University, 2115 G Street NW, Suite 419, Washington, DC 20052 (
Scott Gehlbach is a Professor of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 110 North Hall, Madison, WI 53706 (
Steven Nafziger is an Associate Professor of Economics, Williams College, 24 Hopkins Hall Drive, Williamstown, MA 01267 (
Hide All

Dower acknowledges the support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Grant No. 14.U04.31.0002. Gehlbach acknowledges the financial support of the Graduate School and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at UW Madison. For helpful comments, we thank Ingo Rohlfing and three anonymous referees; Quarmul Ashraf, Onur Bakiner, Chris Carter, Jasper Cooper, Oeindrila Dube, Jon Eguia, Jeff Frieden, Calvin Garner, Gunes Gokmen, Steve Hoch, Dmitrii Kofanov, Andrei Markevich, David McDonald, Marc Meredith, Jack Paine, Bob Powell, John Reuter, Jim Robinson, Bryn Rosenfeld, Jason Seawright, Emily Sellars, Ken Shepsle, Anand Swamy, Georgiy Syunyaev, Henry Thomson, Christian Welzel, and Galina Zudenkova; participants in seminars at Columbia, Emory, Harvard, the Higher School of Economics, LSE, the New Economic School, Penn, Penn State, Rochester, the Ronald Coase Institute Workshop on Institutional Analysis in Tallinn, UC Berkeley, UC Irvine, Washington, Washington University, Williams, and Wisconsin; and participants in annual meetings of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, the Economic History Association, the Midwest Political Science Association, and the Society for Institutional and Organizational Economics.

Hide All
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2000. “Why did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1167–99.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2001. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 938–63.
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Aidt, Toke S., and Franck, Raphäel. 2015. “Democratization under the Threat of Revolution: Evidence from the Great Reform Act of 1832.” Econometrica 83 (2): 505–47.
Aidt, Toke S., and Jensen, Peter S., 2014. “Workers of the World, Unite! Franchise Extensions and the Threat of Revolution in Europe, 1820–938European Economic Review 72 (C): 5275.
Aidt, Toke S., and Leon, Gabriel. 2016. “The Democratic Window of Opportunity: Evidence from Riots in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (4): 694717.
Albertus, Michael. 2015. Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1989. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Alston, Lee J., Libecap, Gary D., and Mueller, Bernardo. 1999. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Baum, Christopher, Schaffer, Mark E., and Stillman, Steven. 2007. “Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/Generalized Method of Moments Estimation and Testing.” Stata Journal 7 (4): 465506.
Bellows, John, and Miguel, Edward. 2009. “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal of Public Economics 93 (11): 1144–57.
Besley, Timothy, Persson, Torsten, and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2016. “Resilient Leaders and Institutional Reform: Theory and Evidence.” Economica 83 (332): 584–623.
Blattman, Christopher. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 231–47.
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, Nyle C., and Weil, Ray R.. 2002. The Nature and Property of Soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brückner, Markus, and Ciccone, Antonio. 2011. “Rain and the Democratic Window of Opportunity.” Econometrica 79 (3): 923–47.
Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2010. “Regime Change and Revolutionary Entrepreneurs.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 446–66.
Buggle, Johannes C., and Nafziger, Steven. 2016. “Long-Run Consequences of Labor Coercion: Evidence from Russian Serfdom.” Unpublished manuscript.
Burke, Paul J., and Leigh, Andrew. 2010. “Do Output Contractions Trigger Democratic Change?American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (4): 124–57.
Bushen, Artur. 1863. Nalichnoe naselenie Rossii za 1858 god. St. Petersburg: Karl Vul’f.
Campante, Filipe R., and Do, Quoc-Anh. 2009. “A Centered Index of Spatial Concentration: Axiomatic Approach with an Application to Population and Capital Cities.” Unpublished manuscript.
Chernozhukov, Victor, and Hansen, Christian. 2008. “The Reduced Form: A Simple Approach to Inference with Weak Instruments.Economics Letters 100: 6871.
Collier, Ruth B. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crews, Robert. 2003. “Empire and the Confessional State: Islam and Religious Politics in Nineteenth Century Russia.” American Historical Review 108 (1), 5083.
Dafoe, Allan, and Lyall, Jason. 2015. “Communication Technologies and Political Conflict: Insights from New Data, Designs, and Questions.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (3): 401–13.
Daly, Sarah. 2012. “Organizational Legacies of Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 49 (3): 473–91.
Deal, Zack. 1981. Serf and State Peasant Agriculture: Khar’kov Province, 1842–1861. New York: Arno Press.
Dennison, Tracy K. 2011. The Institutional Framework of Russian Serfdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Domar, Evsey D. 1970. “The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic History 30 (1): 1832.
Domar, Evsey D., and Machina, Mark J.. 1984. “On the Profitability of Russian Serfdom.” Journal of Economic History 44 (4): 919–55.
Dorsch, Michael T., Dunz, Karl, and Maarek, Paul. 2015. “Macro Shocks and Costly Political Action in Non-democracies.” Public Choice 162 (3): 381404.
Dorsch, Michael T., and Maarek, Paul. 2015. “Inefficient Predation and Political Transitions.” European Journal of Political Economy 37: 3748.
Druzhinin, N. M. 1946 and 1958. Gosudarstvennye krest’iane i reforma P. D. Kiseleva. Moscow: Akademiia nauk SSSR.
Easley, Roxanne. 2008. The Emancipation of the Serfs in Russia: Peace Arbitrators and the Development of Civil Society. London: Routledge.
Eklof, Benjamin. 1988. “Kindertempel or Shack? The School Building in Late Imperial Russia.” Russian Review 47 (2): 561–84.
Engelstein, Laura. 2000.“The Dream of Civil Society in Tsarist Russia: Law, State and Religion.” In Civil Society Before Democracy: Lessons from Nineteenth-century Europe, eds. Bermeo, Nancy Gina and Nord, Philip G.. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield, 2342.
Esteban, Joan-María, and Ray, Debraj. 1994. “On the Measurement of Polarization.” Econometrica 62 (4): 819–51.
Esteban, Joan-María, and Ray, Debraj. 2008. “On the Salience of Ethnic Conflict.” American Economic Review 98 (5): 2185–202.
Fal’bork, G., and Charnoluskii, V., eds. 1900–1905. Nachal’noe narodnoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 4 vols. St. Petersburg: Imperatorskoe vol’noe ekonomicheskoe obshchestvo.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 7590.
Finkel, Evgeny. 2015. “The Phoenix Effect of State Repression: Jewish Resistance during the Holocaust.” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 339–53.
Finkel, Evgeny, Gehlbach, Scott, and Olsen, Tricia. 2015. “Does Reform Prevent Rebellion? Evidence from Russia’s Emancipation of the Serfs.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (8): 9841019.
Frieden, Nancy Mandelker. 1981. Russian Physicians in an Era of Reform and Revolution, 1856–1905. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Galiani, Sebastian, and Torrens, Gustavo. 2014. “Autocracy, Democracy, and Trade Policy.” Journal of International Economics 93 (1): 173–93.
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics. 18 (1): 126.
Garmiza, V. V. 1957. Podgotovka zemskoi reformy 1864 goda. Moscow: Moscow University.
Gassebner, Martin, Lamla, Michael J., and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2013. “Extreme Bounds of Democracy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (2): 171–97.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115– 44.
Gehlbach, Scott. 2013. Formal Models of Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gehlbach, Scott, and Keefer, Philip. 2011. “Investment without Democracy: Ruling-party Institutionalization and Credible Commitment in Autocracies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 39 (2): 123–39.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1965. “Agrarian Policies and Industrialization, Russia 1861–1917.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (VI). The Industrial Revolutions and After: Incomes, Population and Technological Changes (2), eds. Habakkuk, H.J., and Postan, M.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 706 800.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2012. “Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 495516.
Hoch, Steven L. 1986. Serfdom and Social Control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a Village in Tambov. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ialtaev, Dmitrii, 2012. “Okhrannaia deiatel’nost’ politsii v nepodkontrol’nykh zhandarmerii uyezdakh Kazanskoi gubernii vo vtoroi polovine XiX v.” Vestnik Samarskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta 2 (1): 42–5.
Ivanov, Leonid, ed. 1964. Krest’ianskoe Dvizhenie v Rossii v 1861–1869 gg.: Sbornik Dokumentov. Moscow: Mysl’.
Jha, Saumitra, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2012. “Does Combat Experience Foster Organizational Skill? Evidence from Ethnic Cleansing during the Partition of South Asia.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 883907.
Khoziaistvennyi Departament, Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh del. 1878–1890. Sbornik pravitel’stvennykh rasporiazhnii po delam, do zemskikh uchrezhdenii otnosiashchimsia. 2nd ed. 13 vols. St. Petersburg.
Khristoforov, Igor’. 2011. Sud’ba Reformy: Russkoe krest’ianstvo v pravitel’stvennoi politike do i posle otmeny krepostnogo prava (1830–1890-e gg.). Moscow: Sobranie.
Komissiia o Gubernskikh i Uyezdnykh Uchrezhdeniiakh. 1890. Istoricheskaia zapiska o khode rabot po sostavleniiu i primeneniiu polozheniia o zemskikh uchrezhdeniiakh. St. Petersburg.
Kotkin, Stephen. 2009. Uncivil Society: 1989 and the Implosion of the Communist Establishment. New York: Modern Library.
Larionova, Maria B. 2013. “Dvoriane Permskoi gubernii v XVIII–nachale XX veka: chislennost’, sostav, zemel’naia sobstvennost’.” Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta 22 (2): 1834.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69105.
Lizzeri, Alessandro, and Persico, Nicola. 2004. “Why did the Elites Extend the Suffrage? Democracy and the Schope of Government with an Application to Britain’s ‘Age of Reform’.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2): 707–65.
Malloy, James A. 1969. “N. A. Miliutin and the Zemstvo Reform of 1864.” Slavic and East-European Studies/Etudes Slaves et Est-Europeenes XIV: 83102.
Markevich, Andrei, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. 2016. “The Economic Effects of the Abolition of Serfdom: Evidence from the Russian Empire.” Unpublished manuscript.
Mitra, Anirban, and Ray, Debraj. 2014. “Implications of an Economic Theory of Conflict: Hindu-Muslim Violence in India.” Journal of Political Economy 122 (4): 719–65.
Montalvo, Josè G., and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2003. “Religious Polarization and Economic Development.” Economics Letters 80: 201–10.
Montalvo, Josè G., and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2005. “Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 796816.
Moon, David. 1999. The Russian Peasantry 1600–1930: The World the Peasants Made. London: Longman.
Moon, David. 2001. The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, 1762–1907. London: Longman.
Nafziger, Steven. 2011. “Did Ivan’s Vote Matter? The Political Economy of Local Democracy in Tsarist Russia.” European Review of Economic History 15 (3): 393441.
Nafziger, Steven. 2012. “The Political Economy of Rural Primary Education in Tsarist Russia.” Working paper, Department of Economics, Williams College.
Obchinnikov, V. M., ed. 1872. Zakony o zemskikh vyborakh. Viatka, Russia.
Okun’, Semen, ed. 1962. Krest’ianskoe Dvizhenie v Rossii v 1850–1856 gg.: Sbornik Dokumentov. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury.
Okun’, Semen, and Sivkov, Konstantin, eds. 1963. Krest’ianskoe Dvizhenie v Rossii v 1857–mae 1861 gg.: Sbornik Dokumentov. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi literatury.
Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2007. “Lecture Notes on Measurement Error.” Unpublished manuscript.
Przeworski, Adam. 2009. “Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 291321.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas. 1959. Nicholas I and Official Nationality in Russia, 1825–1855. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Semykina, Anastasia, and Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.. 2010. “Estimating Panel Data Models in the Presence of Endogeneity and Selection.” Journal of Econometrics 157 (2): 375–80.
Seregny, Scott. 1999. “Power and Discourse in Russian Elementary Education: The School Inspectorate, 1869–1917.” Jahrbucher fur Geschichte Osteuropas. 47 (2): 161–86.
Starr, S. Frederick. 1972. Decentralization and Self-Government in Russia, 1830–1870. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stock, James, and Yogo, Motohiro. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” Identification and Inference for Econometric Models, eds. Andrews, Donald W.K. and Stock, James H.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 80108.
Ticchi, Davide, and Vindigni, Andrea. 2008. “War and Endogenous Democracy.” Unpublished manuscript.
Troinitskii, Aleksandr. 1861. Krepostnoe naselenie v Rossii, po 10-i narodnoii perepisi: Statisticheskoe issledovanie. Saint Petersburg: Karl Vul’f.
Tsentral’nyi Statisticheskii Komitet, Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh del. 1866. Statisticheskii vremennik” Rossiiskoi Imperii. Vol. 1 (Series I). St. Petersburg.
Tsentral’nyi Statisticheskii Komitet, Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh del. 1870. Statisticheskii vremennik” Rossiiskoi Imperii. Vol. 10 (Series II). St. Petersburg.
Tsentral’nyi Statisticheskii Komitet, Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh del. 1884. Sel’skiia uchilishcha v Evropeiskoi Rossii i Privislianskikh guberniiakh. Vol. 1 (Series III). Statisticheskii vremennik Rossiiskoi imperii. St. Petersburg.
Tsentral’nyi Statisticheskii Komitet, Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh del. 1886. Sbornik svedenii po Rossii za 1883 god. Vol. 8 (Series III). Statisticheskii vremennik Rossiiskoi imperii. St. Petersburg.
Weidmann, Nils B. 2016. “A Closer Look at Reporting Bias in Event Data.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 206–18.
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–63.
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Hunziker, Philipp, and Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2016. “Who Inherits the State? Colonial Rule and Postcolonial Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 882–98.
Zaionchkovskii, Petr. 1968. Otmena Krepostnogo Prava v Rossii. 3rd ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Zaionchkovskii, Petr, and Paina, Esfir’, eds. 1968. Krest’ianskoe Dvizhenie v Rossii v 1870–1880 gg.: Sbornik Dokumentov. Moscow: Nauka.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Dower et al supplementary material
Dower et al supplementary material 1

 PDF (579 KB)
579 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 104
Total number of PDF views: 446 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2100 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th November 2017 - 25th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.