Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Collective Threat Framing and Mobilization in Civil War


Research on civil war mobilization emphasizes armed group recruitment tactics and individual motivations to fight, but does not explore how individuals come to perceive the threat involved in civil war. Drawing on eight months of fieldwork with participants and nonparticipants in the Georgian-Abkhaz war of 1992–93, this article argues that social structures, within which individuals are embedded, provide access to information critical for mobilization decisions by collectively framing threat. Threat framing filters from national through local leadership, to be consolidated and acted on within quotidian networks. Depending on how the threat is perceived—whether toward the self or the collectivity at its different levels—individuals adopt self- to other-regarding roles, from fleeing to fighting on behalf of the collectivity, even if it is a weaker actor in the war. This analysis sheds light on how the social framing of threat shapes mobilization trajectories and how normative and instrumental motivations interact in civil war.

Corresponding author
Anastasia Shesterinina, Yale University, MacMillan Center, 34 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520-8206 (
Hide All

I am deeply grateful to my interlocutors in the field. Consuelo Amat Matus, Erin Baines, Jeffrey T. Checkel, Brian Job, Stathis N. Kalyvas, Peter Krause, William Reno, Pilar Riaño-Alcalá, Lee Seymour, Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, Elisabeth Jean Wood, four anonymous reviewers, the editors of the American Political Science Review, and participants in the Program on Order, Conflict, and Violence at Yale University and the Harvard-MIT-Yale Political Violence Conference provided insightful comments and advice. Support for research and writing is acknowledged from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University, and the Security and Defense Forum, the Faculty of Graduate Studies, the Department of Political Science, and the Liu Institute for Global Issues at University of British Columbia. The fieldwork reported in this article was covered by Ethics Certificate number H11-02222 of September 21, 2011. Any errors or omissions are my own.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Mark R. Beissinger 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mark R. Beissinger 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine's Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 574–92.

Robert D. Benford , and David A. Snow . 2000. “ Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment .” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–39.

Christopher Blattman , and Edward Miguel . 2010. “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature 48 (1): 357.

Erica Chenoweth , and Adria Lawrence , eds. 2010. Rethinking Violence: States and Non-State Actors in Conflict. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nissim Cohen , and Tamar Arieli . 2011. “Field Research in Conflict Environments: Methodological Challenges and Snowball Sampling.” Journal of Peace Research 48 (4): 423–35.

Raymond Cohen . 1978. “Threat Perception in International Crisis.” Political Science Quarterly 93 (1): 93107.

James S. Coleman 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 95120.

Paul Collier , and Anke Hoeffler . 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4): 563–95.

Christian Davenport , and Patrick Ball . 2002. “Views to a Kill: Exploring the Implications of Source Selection in the Case of Guatemalan State Terror, 1977–1995.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (3): 427–50.

Jesse R. Driscoll 2015. Warlords and Coalition Politics in Post-Soviet States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

James D. Fearon , and David D. Laitin . 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.

James Fearon , and Alexander Wendt . 2002. “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View.” In Handbook of International Relations, eds. Walter Carlsnaes , Thomas Risse , and Beth Simmons . London: Sage, 5272.

Lee Ann Fujii . 2008. “The Power of Local Ties: Popular Participation in the Rwandan Genocide.” Security Studies 17 (3): 568–97.

Lee Ann Fujii . 2010. “Shades of Truth and Lies: Interpreting Testimonies of War and Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 231–41.

Scott Gates . 2002. “Recruitment and Allegiance: The Microfoundations of Rebellion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 111–30.

Mark S. Granovetter 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.

Mark S. Granovetter 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481510.

George B. Hewitt 2013. Discordant Neighbours: A Reassessment of the Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-South Ossetian Conflicts. Boston: BRILL.

Macartan Humphreys , and Jeremy M. Weinstein . 2008. “Who Fights? The Determinants of Participation in Civil War.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 436–55.

Stathis N. Kalyvas 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stathis N. Kalyvas , and Matthew A. Kocher . 2007. “How ‘Free’ is Free Riding in Civil Wars? Violence, Insurgency, and the Collective Action Problem.” World Politics 59 (2): 177216.

Chaim Kaufmann . 1996. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars.” International Security 20 (4): 136–75.

Bethany Lacina . 2006. “Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 276–89.

Dov Lynch . 2000. Russian Peacekeeping Strategies in the CIS: The Cases of Moldova, Georgia and Tajikistan. New York: Macmillan Press.

David Malet . 2013. Foreign Fighters: Transnational Identity in Civil Conflicts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Doug McAdam . 1986. “Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 6490.

Omar S. McDoom 2012. “The Psychology of Threat in Intergroup Conflict: Emotions, Rationality, and Opportunity in the Rwandan Genocide.” International Security 37 (2): 119–55.

Sarah E. Parkinson 2013. “Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High-Risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War.” American Political Science Review 107 (3): 418–32.

Roger D. Petersen 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Francesca Polletta , and James M. Jasper . 2001. “Collective Identity and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 283305.

Barry R. Posen 1993. “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict.” Survival 35 (1): 2747.

Sidney Tarrow . 2007. “Inside Insurgencies: Politics and Violence in an Age of Civil War.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 587600.

Jocelyn S. Viterna 2013. Women in War: The Micro-Processes of Mobilization in El Salvador. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lisa Wedeen . 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13 (1): 255–72.

Elisabeth J. Wood 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elisabeth J. Wood 2007. “Field Research during War: Ethical Dilemmas.” In New Perspectives in Political Ethnography, eds. Lauren Joseph , Matthew Mahler , and Javier Auyero . New York: Springer Science, 205–23.

Elisabeth J. Wood 2008. “The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 539–61.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Shesterinina supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (219 KB)
219 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 61
Total number of PDF views: 807 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3034 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th October 2016 - 18th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.