Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 134
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Laumond, Bénédicte 2017. Rassismuskritik und Widerstandsformen.


    Arikan Akdağ, Gül 2016. Rational political parties and electoral games: the AKP's strategic move for the Kurdish vote in Turkey. Turkish Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 126.


    Arter, David 2016. Neglected and Unloved: Does the Hinge Party Deserve That?. Scandinavian Political Studies,


    BAKKER, BERT N. ROODUIJN, MATTHIJS and SCHUMACHER, GIJS 2016. The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 302.


    Basile, Linda 2016. Measuring party strategies on the territorial dimension: a method based on content analysis. Regional & Federal Studies, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Bouteca, Nicolas and Devos, Carl 2016. Party policy change. Exploring the limits of ideological flexibility in Belgium. Acta Politica, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 298.


    Bräuninger, Thomas Müller, Jochen and Stecker, Christian 2016. Modeling Preferences Using Roll Call Votes in Parliamentary Systems. Political Analysis, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 189.


    Crines, Andrew and Heppell, Tim 2016. Rhetorical style and issue emphasis within the conference speeches of UKIP’s Nigel Farage 2010–2014. British Politics,


    Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz 2016. Do parties matter in delegation? Partisan preferences and the creation of regulatory agencies in Europe. Regulation & Governance, p. n/a.


    Gomez, Raul Morales, Laura and Ramiro, Luis 2016. Varieties of Radicalism: Examining the Diversity of Radical Left Parties and Voters in Western Europe. West European Politics, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 351.


    Hobolt, Sara B. and Tilley, James 2016. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 971.


    Janušauskienė, Diana 2016. Ethnicity as political cleavage: the political agenda of the Polish national minority in Lithuania. Nationalities Papers, Vol. 44, Issue. 4, p. 578.


    Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira and Taggart, Paul 2016. Dealing with populists in government: a framework for analysis. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 201.


    Meyer, Chase B. and Odom, Brett N. 2016. Raising a big tent: Internal party composition and leadership selectorate expansion. Electoral Studies, Vol. 43, p. 1.


    Otjes, Simon 2016. The Hobbyhorse of the Party for the Animals. Society & Animals,


    Zons, Gregor 2016. How programmatic profiles of niche parties affect their electoral performance. West European Politics, p. 1.


    Art, David 2015. The containment of the radical right in Western Europe: a response to Carvalho. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 38, Issue. 8, p. 1347.


    Budge, Ian 2015. Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis. West European Politics, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 761.


    Burscher, Bjorn van Spanje, Joost and de Vreese, Claes H. 2015. Owning the issues of crime and immigration: The relation between immigration and crime news and anti-immigrant voting in 11 countries. Electoral Studies, Vol. 38, p. 59.


    Curini, Luigi 2015. An Italian Leitmotiv? Corruption and Competence in the Debates of the Italian Chamber of Deputies (1946–2014). South European Society and Politics, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 509.


    ×

Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success

  • BONNIE M. MEGUID (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701
  • Published online: 01 August 2005
Abstract

What accounts for variation in the electoral success of niche parties? Although institutional and sociological explanations of single-issue party strength have been dominant, they tend to remove parties from the analysis. In this article, I argue that the behavior of mainstream parties influences the electoral fortunes of the new, niche party actors. In contrast to standard spatial theories, my theory recognizes that party tactics work by altering the salience and ownership of issues for political competition, not just party issue positions. It follows that niche party support can be shaped by both proximal and non-proximal competitors. Analysis of green and radical right party vote in 17 Western European countries from 1970 to 2000 confirms that mainstream party strategies matter; the modified spatial theory accounts for the failure and success of niche parties across countries and over time better than institutional, sociological, and even standard spatial explanations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Bonnie M. Meguid is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627. (bonnie.meguid@rochester.edu).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×