Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 367
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Alcantara, Christopher Broschek, Jörg and Nelles, Jen 2016. Rethinking Multilevel Governance as an Instance of Multilevel Politics: A Conceptual Strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 33.


    Bäck, Maria and Christensen, Henrik Serup 2016. When trust matters—a multilevel analysis of the effect of generalized trust on political participation in 25 European democracies. Journal of Civil Society, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 178.


    Benson, David Lorenzoni, Irene and Cook, Hadrian 2016. Evaluating social learning in England flood risk management: An ‘individual-community interaction’ perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 55, p. 326.


    Blessing, Anita 2016. Repackaging the poor? Conceptualising neoliberal reforms of social rental housing. Housing Studies, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, p. 149.


    Bruschi, Alessandro 2016. Measurement in social research: some misunderstandings. Quality & Quantity,


    Centellas, Miguel 2016. The Santa CruzAutonomíaMovement in Bolivia: A Case of Non-indigenous Ethnic Popular Mobilization?. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 245.


    Chou, Meng-Hsuan and Ravinet, Pauline 2016. The emergent terrains of ‘higher education regionalism’: how and why higher education is an interesting case for comparative regionalism. European Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 271.


    Fagerholm, Andreas 2016. What is left for the radical left? A comparative examination of the policies of radical left parties in western Europe before and after 1989. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, p. 1.


    Huber, Robert A. and Schimpf, Christian H. 2016. A drunken guest in Europe?. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft,


    Jahn, Detlef 2016. Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 47.


    Jones, Michael D. Peterson, Holly L. Pierce, Jonathan J. Herweg, Nicole Bernal, Amiel Lamberta Raney, Holly and Zahariadis, Nikolaos 2016. A River Runs Through It: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    Kanol, Direnç 2016. The impact of democracy on interest group system institutionalization. Journal of Public Affairs, p. n/a.


    Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl 2016. Quantitative differences in think tank dissemination activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK. Policy Sciences,


    Lacey, Joseph 2016. Conceptually Mapping the European Union: A Demoi-cratic Analysis. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 61.


    Morgan, Kimberly J. 2016. Process tracing and the causal identification revolution. New Political Economy, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 489.


    Motyl, Alexander J. 2016. Putin's Russia as a fascist political system. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 25.


    Pusterla, Elia R. G. 2016. The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept.


    Pusterla, Elia R. G. 2016. The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept.


    Pusterla, Elia R. G. 2016. The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept.


    Pusterla, Elia R. G. 2016. The Credibility of Sovereignty – The Political Fiction of a Concept.


    ×

Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics*

  • Giovanni Sartori (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1958356
  • Published online: 01 August 2014
Abstract

“To have mastered ‘theory’ and ‘method’ is to have become a conscious thinker, a man at work and aware of the assumptions and implications of whatever he is about. To be mastered by ‘method’ or ‘theory’ is simply to be kept from working.” The sentence applies nicely to the present plight of political science. The profession as a whole oscillates between two unsound extremes. At the one end a large majority of political scientists qualify as pure and simple unconscious thinkers. At the other end a sophisticated minority qualify as overconscious thinkers, in the sense that their standards of method and theory are drawn from the physical, “paradigmatic” sciences.

The wide gap between the unconscious and the overconscious thinker is concealed by the growing sophistication of statistical and research techniques. Most of the literature introduced by the title “Methods” (in the social, behavioral or political sciences) actually deals with survey techniques and social statistics, and has little if anything to share with the crucial concern of “methodology,” which is a concern with the logical structure and procedure of scientific enquiry. In a very crucial sense there is no methodology without logos, without thinking about thinking. And if a firm distinction is drawn—as it should be—between methodology and technique, the latter is no substitute for the former. One may be a wonderful researcher and manipulator of data, and yet remain an unconscious thinker.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

An earlier draft, “Theory and Method in Comparative Politics,” was submitted as a working paper to the IPSA Torino Round Table of September, 1969. I wish to thank, in this connection, the Agnelli Foundation which provided the grant for the Torino panel. I am particularly indebted to David Apter, Harry Eckstein, Carl J. Friedrich, Joseph LaPalombara, Felix Oppenheim and Fred W. Riggs for their critical comments. I am also very much obliged to the Concilium on International and Area Studies at Yale University, of which I was a fellow in 1966–67. This article is part of the work done under the auspices of the Concilium.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Ralph Braibanti , “Comparative Political Analytics Reconsidered,” The Journal of Politics, 30 (021968), 4449

Edward R. Tufte , “Improving Data Analysis in Political Science,” World Politics, 21 (071969), esp. p. 645.)

Reinhard Bendix , “Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies,” American Sociological Review, 28 (1963), p. 533

R. E. Dowse , “A Functionalist's Logic,” World Politics, (071966), 607622

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×