Leone, Luigi and Presaghi, Fabio 2018. Tea Party Support, Racial Resentment and Evaluations of Obama: A Moderation Analysis. Race and Social Problems,
Harteveld, Eelco Schaper, Joep De Lange, Sarah L. and Van Der Brug, Wouter 2018. Blaming Brussels? The Impact of (News about) the Refugee Crisis on Attitudes towards the EU and National Politics. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 157.
Stockmann, Daniela Esarey, Ashley and Zhang, Jie 2018. Who Is Afraid of the Chinese State? Evidence Calling into Question Political Fear as an Explanation for Overreporting of Political Trust. Political Psychology,
Collingwood, Loren Lajevardi, Nazita and Oskooii, Kassra A. R. 2018. A Change of Heart? Why Individual-Level Public Opinion Shifted Against Trump’s “Muslim Ban”. Political Behavior,
Baerg, Nicole Rae Hotchkiss, Julie L. and Quispe-Agnoli, Myriam 2018. Documenting the unauthorized: Political responses to unauthorized immigration. Economics & Politics, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Berry, Venise and White-Langhorn, Karletta 2017. Do You Know? Edutainment, HIV/AIDS, and African Americans. Howard Journal of Communications, p. 1.
Matthes, Jörg and Schmuck, Desirée 2017. The Effects of Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Ads on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: A Moderated Mediation Model. Communication Research, Vol. 44, Issue. 4, p. 556.
Caverley, Jonathan D. and Krupnikov, Yanna 2017. Aiming at Doves. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 61, Issue. 7, p. 1482.
Schmuck, Desirée and Matthes, Jörg 2017. Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals. Political Communication, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 607.
Zilis, Michael A. 2017. Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness. Political Research Quarterly, p. 106591291773517.
Jones, Bradford and Martin, Danielle Joesten 2017. Path-to-Citizenship or Deportation? How Elite Cues Shaped Opinion on Immigration in the 2010 U.S. House Elections. Political Behavior, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 177.
Herrmann, Michael and Tepe, Markus 2017. Does Exposure to Stereotype-Disconfirming Politicians Reduce the Effect of Stereotypes on Voting? Evidence From Seven Plagiarism Scandals in Germany. Political Psychology,
Diament, Sean M. Howat, Adam J. and Lacombe, Matthew J. 2017. What is the Canon in American Politics? Analyses of Core Graduate Syllabi. Journal of Political Science Education, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 256.
Kinder, Donald R. and Ryan, Timothy J. 2017. Prejudice and Politics Re-Examined The Political Significance of Implicit Racial Bias. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 5, Issue. 02, p. 241.
Mayerl, Jochen and Faas, Thorsten 2017. Campaign dynamics of cognitive accessibility of political judgments: measuring the impact of campaigns and campaign events using response latencies in two German rolling cross section studies. Quality & Quantity,
Öhberg, Patrik and Medeiros, Mike 2017. A sensitive question? The effect of an ethnic background question in surveys. Ethnicities, p. 146879681774037.
Beach, Derek Hansen, Kasper M. and Larsen, Martin V. 2017. How Campaigns Enhance European Issues Voting During European Parliament Elections. Political Science Research and Methods, p. 1.
Facchini, Giovanni Mayda, Anna Maria and Puglisi, Riccardo 2017. Illegal immigration and media exposure: evidence on individual attitudes. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, Vol. 7, Issue. 1,
Benjamin, Andrea 2017. Coethnic Endorsements, Out-Group Candidate Preferences, and Perceptions in Local Elections. Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 53, Issue. 4, p. 631.
Recent evidence suggests that elites can capitalize on preexisting linkages between issues and social groups to alter the criteria citizens use to make political decisions. In particular, studies have shown that subtle racial cues in campaign communications may activate racial attitudes, thereby altering the foundations of mass political decision making. However, the precise psychological mechanism by which such attitudes are activated has not been empirically demonstrated, and the range of implicit cues powerful enough to produce this effect is still unknown. In an experiment, we tested whether subtle racial cues embedded in political advertisements prime racial attitudes as predictors of candidate preference by making them more accessible in memory. Results show that a wide range of implicit race cues can prime racial attitudes and that cognitive accessibility mediates the effect. Furthermore, counter-stereotypic cues—especially those implying blacks are deserving of government resources—dampen racial priming, suggesting that the meaning drawn from the visual/narrative pairing in an advertisement, and not simply the presence of black images, triggers the effect.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.