Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 113
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Banks, Antoine J. 2016. Are Group Cues Necessary? How Anger Makes Ethnocentrism Among Whites a Stronger Predictor of Racial and Immigration Policy Opinions. Political Behavior,

    Brewer, Paul R. Wilson, David C. and Habegger, Michael 2016. Wedding Imagery and Public Support for Gay Marriage. Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 63, Issue. 8, p. 1041.

    Clemons, Randy S. Peterson, Rolfe D. and Palmer, Carl L. 2016. Priming Assad: An Experiment of Ethnic Priming and Attitudes Toward Military Action in Syria. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw012.

    Jones, Bradford and Martin, Danielle Joesten 2016. Path-to-Citizenship or Deportation? How Elite Cues Shaped Opinion on Immigration in the 2010 U.S. House Elections. Political Behavior,

    Luttig, Matthew D. and Callaghan, Timothy H. 2016. Is President Obama’s Race Chronically Accessible? Racial Priming in the 2012 Presidential Election. Political Communication, p. 1.

    Messing, Solomon Jabon, Maria and Plaut, Ethan 2016. Bias in the Flesh. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Issue. 1, p. 44.

    Moehler, Devra and Conroy-Krutz, Jeffrey 2016. Eyes on the ballot: Priming effects and ethnic voting in the developing world. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 99.

    Nteta, Tatishe M. Lisi, Rebecca and Tarsi, Melinda R. 2016. Rendering the implicit explicit: political advertisements, partisan cues, race, and white public opinion in the 2012 presidential election. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Rogowski, Jon C. and Sutherland, Joseph L. 2016. How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 485.

    Sen, Maya and Wasow, Omar 2016. Race as a Bundle of Sticks: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 499.

    Shin, Gi-Wook Izatt, Hilary and Moon, Rennie J. 2016. Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics: the US–Republic of Korea case. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 70, Issue. 3, p. 235.

    Tai, Qiuqing 2016. Western Media Exposure and Chinese Immigrants’ Political Perceptions. Political Communication, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 78.

    Wilson, David C. and Brewer, Paul R. 2016. Do Frames Emphasizing Harm to Age and Racial-Ethnic Groups Reduce Support for Voter ID Laws?*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 2, p. 391.

    Albertson, Bethany L. 2015. Dog-Whistle Politics: Multivocal Communication and Religious Appeals. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Arendt, Florian Marquart, Franziska and Matthes, Jörg 2015. Effects of Right-Wing Populist Political Advertising on Implicit and Explicit Stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 178.

    Bell, Melissa A. and Kaufmann, Karen M. 2015. The Electoral Consequences of Marriage and Motherhood: How Gender Traits Influence Voter Evaluations of Female Candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Cranmer, Mirjam 2015. The Effects of Populist Emotive Appeals Within Direct-Democratic Campaigning. Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 284.

    Creighton, Mathew J. and Jamal, Amaney 2015. Does Islam play a role in anti-immigrant sentiment? An experimental approach. Social Science Research, Vol. 53, p. 89.

    Edy, Jill A. Bisel, Ryan S. and Overton, Jerry E. 2015. Hail to the Chief: Using Honorifics to Refer to the President in Cable News. Howard Journal of Communications, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Harrison, Brian F. and Michelson, Melissa R. 2015. God and Marriage: The Impact of Religious Identity Priming on Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 96, Issue. 5, p. 1411.


Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes During Campaigns

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2002

Recent evidence suggests that elites can capitalize on preexisting linkages between issues and social groups to alter the criteria citizens use to make political decisions. In particular, studies have shown that subtle racial cues in campaign communications may activate racial attitudes, thereby altering the foundations of mass political decision making. However, the precise psychological mechanism by which such attitudes are activated has not been empirically demonstrated, and the range of implicit cues powerful enough to produce this effect is still unknown. In an experiment, we tested whether subtle racial cues embedded in political advertisements prime racial attitudes as predictors of candidate preference by making them more accessible in memory. Results show that a wide range of implicit race cues can prime racial attitudes and that cognitive accessibility mediates the effect. Furthermore, counter-stereotypic cues—especially those implying blacks are deserving of government resources—dampen racial priming, suggesting that the meaning drawn from the visual/narrative pairing in an advertisement, and not simply the presence of black images, triggers the effect.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *