Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Demand Competition and Policy Compromise in Legislative Bargaining

  • Massimo Morelli (a1)

I propose a new majoritarian bargaining model in which more than one implicit proposal can be on the table at the same time. Institutional differences from system to system affect the order of play, the equilibrium majorities, and the policy outcome. The ex post distribution of payoffs within a winning coalition is, however, invariant to fundamental institutional differences, and it is always proportional to the distribution of relative ex ante bargaining power. The bargaining process is modeled as a sequential demand game, in which players are called to propose a policy and to specify their desired share of the private benefits related to being in office. The order of play is endogenous, and the distribution of payoffs within an equilibrium majority usually does not depend on who is the proposal maker. The role of the head of state and the advantages to center parties are also studied.

Hide All
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82 (June): 405–22.
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1990. “Stable Governments and the Allocation of Policy Portfolios.” American Political Science Review 84 (September): 891906.
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago, IL: Markham.
Baron, David P. 1991. “A Spatial Bargaining Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems.” American Political Science Review 85 (March): 137–64.
Baron, David P. 1993. “Government Formation and Endogenous Parties.” American Political Science Review 87 (March): 3447.
Baron, David P. 1998. “Comparative Dynamics of Parliamentary Governments.” American Political Science Review 92 (September): 593609.
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 1181–206.
Bennett, Elaine, and Van Damme, Eric. 1991. “Demand Commitment Bargaining, the Case of Apex Games.” In Game Equilibrium Models III, Strategic Bargaining, ed. Selten, Reinhard. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 118–40.
Browne, Eric C., and Franklin, Mark. 1973. “Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 67 (June): 453–69.
Browne, Eric C., and Frendreis, John P. 1980. “Allocating Coalition Payoffs by Conventional Norm: Assessment of the Evidence for Cabinet Coalition Situations.” American Journal of Political Science 24 (November): 753–68.
Crombez, Christophe. 1996. “Minority Governments, Minimal Winning Coalitions and Surplus Majorities in Parliamentary Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 29 (January): 129.
Davis, Morton, and Maschler, Michael. 1965. “The Kernel of a Cooperative Game.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 12 (September): 223–59.
de Swaan, Abram. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 1998. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies.” New York University. Typescript.
Gamson, William A. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26 (June): 373–82.
Harrington, Joseph E. 1990. “The Power of the Proposal Maker in a Model of Endogenous Agenda Formation.” Public Choice 64 (1): 120.
Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1990. “Coalition and Cabinet Government.” American Political Science Review 84 (September): 873–90.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1986. Comparative Deomcracy: Policy Making and Government Coalitions in Western Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 648–65.
Norman, Peter. 1997. “Legislative Bargaining and Coalition Formation.” University of Wisconsin, Madison. Typescript.
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50 (January): 97109.
Schofield, Norman. 1986. “Existence of a Structurally Stable Equilibrium for a Non-Collegial Voting Rule.” Public Choice 51 (3): 267–84.
Schofield, Norman. 1993. “Political Competition and Multiparty Coalition Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 23 (January): 133.
Schofield, Norman, and Laver, Michael. 1985. “Bargaining Theory and Portfolio Payoffs in European Coalition Governments 1945 to 1983.” British Journal of Political Science 15 (April): 143–64.
Selten, Reinhard. 1992. “A Demand Commitment Model of Coalitional Bargaining.” In Rational Interaction Essays in Honor of John Harsanyi, ed. Selten, Reinhard. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Pp. 245–82.
Sened, Itai. 1996. “A Model of Coalition Formation: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Politics 58 (May): 350–72.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winter, Eyal. 1994a. “The Demand Commitment Bargaining: a Snowball in Cooperation.” Economic Theory 4 (March): 255–73.
Winter, Eyal. 1994b. “Non-Cooperative Bargaining in Natural Monopolies.” Journal of Economic Theory 64 (October): 202–20.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed